Email hello@cookedindex.com with Verdict dispute in the subject. The strongest disputes argue a specific dimension score rather than the verdict label, because the label is only the sum of the five — say which dimension, what number it should be, and why.
Arguing with the score is easier if you have what produced it. The exact scoring prompt is at /method/scoring-prompt.txt and the complete dataset behind every page is at /reports.json. Between them you can reproduce any verdict here, or demonstrate that we cannot.
Accepted corrections are published in the changelog with the argument that produced them and credit to whoever made it. Disputes arrive privately now and are answered in public, which is the part that actually matters.
General: hello@cookedindex.com
Sponsorship: sponsors@cookedindex.com — slots
are labelled as sponsored on every card; we don't sell coverage,
placement in the register, or a verdict.
Press: press@cookedindex.com — the
methodology, the reliability figures and the raw per-occupation
output are public, so you can check anything before you print it.
Occupations come from the published BLS classification, so we can't remove one — it would leave a hole in a register that claims to cover every occupation. We will correct a score, a rationale, or a piece of evidence that's wrong.
If you're named as an employer in the dispatch and the reporting is inaccurate, email hello@cookedindex.com with the article and what's wrong. We summarise and link published reporting rather than investigating, so in most cases the correction belongs with the publisher — but we'll drop or amend an entry that misrepresents what was reported.