{
  "source": "Cooked Index — occupational AI risk register",
  "page": "https://cookedindex.com/jobs/business-operations-specialists-all-other/",
  "methodology": "https://cookedindex.com/methodology",
  "notice": "Verdicts are re-examined as evidence accumulates. Re-fetch before relying on this; the page above always carries the current score.",
  "scored_at": "2026-08-11",
  "model": "claude-opus-5",
  "occupation": {
    "title": "Business Operations Specialists, All Other",
    "soc_code": "13-1199",
    "category": "Business",
    "us_employment": 1087090,
    "median_annual_wage": 83050
  },
  "verdict": "EXPOSED",
  "risk_resistance": 34,
  "contested": false,
  "near_boundary": true,
  "dimensions": {
    "task_resistance": 9,
    "embodiment": 4,
    "liability_shield": 2,
    "trust_premium": 8,
    "judgment_accountability": 11
  },
  "reasoning": {
    "task_resistance": "Building the weekly KPI rollup, reconciling vendor invoices against PO lines, drafting the SOP after the process change, and turning meeting notes into a RAID log are all now generated at first-draft quality; what holds the score at 9 rather than 4 is the standing-in-a-doorway work — chasing the finance lead who missed the data cutoff, renegotiating a scope line with a supplier who is already behind, and sequencing a rollout across three teams with conflicting calendars.",
    "embodiment": "Occasional site walkthroughs for a process mapping exercise or a physical inventory count keep this off zero, but the desk, the laptop, and the conference room are the whole workplace, and nothing you touch has a torque spec.",
    "liability_shield": "There is no licence to hold — PMP, Lean Six Sigma, or CBAP are resume signals, not statutory gatekeepers — and when a contract term or a compliance filing goes wrong the signature on it belongs to a procurement officer, controller, or general counsel, not to you.",
    "trust_premium": "You accumulate real institutional capital — knowing which director actually approves things versus who is cc'd, and which system of record is quietly wrong — but that is knowledge about the organization rather than a client relationship, and it transfers to your successor within a quarter or two of handover.",
    "judgment_accountability": "You decide what gets escalated, which of three imperfect vendor options to recommend, and whether a milestone is genuinely at risk or just late-looking, but the go/no-go, the spend authority, and the headcount consequences sit one or two levels above you, which is what caps this at 11 rather than putting it in the ownership band."
  },
  "rationale": "This is a catch-all bucket — program coordinators, process improvement analysts, vendor and contract administrators, business continuity and compliance support staff — and the modal worker spends most of the day in spreadsheets, decks, trackers, dashboards, and status write-ups, which is exactly what current models do at usable quality. What survives is not the artifact but the cross-functional wrangling: getting a reluctant department to actually change a process, deciding which of three bad tradeoffs to escalate, and owning the outcome when a rollout stalls. No license, no signature requirement, so there is no regulatory floor under the role — the protection is purely organizational trust and accountability.",
  "outlook": "Reporting-and-coordination headcount in this bucket shrinks meaningfully over ten years while a smaller tier of program owners and negotiators who carry accountability grows more valuable.",
  "what_would_raise_it": {
    "levers": [
      {
        "dimension": "judgment_accountability",
        "change": "Formal internal ownership of AI-generated operational outputs: e.g. a named 'human owner of record' for each automated workflow, of the kind the EU AI Act Art. 26 human-oversight duty and NIST AI RMF 'accountable role' guidance are pushing large firms to designate. If ops specialists become the designated reviewers/escalation owners for automated vendor, continuity and compliance processes, the role's consequential-call share rises rather than falls.",
        "plausibility": "already happening",
        "would_add": 4
      },
      {
        "dimension": "task_resistance",
        "change": "Genuine two-tier structure: deck-building, tracker maintenance and status write-ups automate first, leaving cross-functional change management — persuading a reluctant department, negotiating scope with a vendor, deciding what to escalate. If headcount contracts onto the wrangling tier, measured resistance of the remaining job rises even with no new capability barrier.",
        "plausibility": "plausible",
        "would_add": 3
      },
      {
        "dimension": "liability_shield",
        "change": "Sarbanes-Oxley-style attestation extended downward: SOX 404 already forces named process owners to certify internal controls, and SEC cyber/incident disclosure rules (2023) push continuity and third-party risk into certified territory. A rule or auditor practice requiring a named individual to attest that a vendor-risk or continuity control was human-reviewed would create a signature floor where none exists.",
        "plausibility": "plausible",
        "would_add": 3
      },
      {
        "dimension": "liability_shield",
        "change": "Certification bodies (PMI, ASQ, DRI International, ISO 22301 lead-implementer regimes) becoming procurement prerequisites for government or regulated-industry contracts — a credential gate, not personal liability, so worth less than a true licence.",
        "plausibility": "plausible",
        "would_add": 2
      }
    ],
    "ceiling_note": "Even with all of these, this SOC bucket is heterogeneous and mostly unlicensed; the trust premium is organizational, not market-facing, so buyers cannot pay for a named human. Realistic ceiling is mid-40s, and the gains land unevenly — compliance and continuity subroles capture nearly all of them while program coordinators and process analysts capture none."
  },
  "adjudication": {
    "method": "two independent runs agreed on the verdict",
    "outcome": "corroborated",
    "run_totals": [
      34,
      34
    ],
    "run_verdicts": [
      "EXPOSED",
      "EXPOSED"
    ]
  },
  "employment_history": {
    "points": [
      {
        "y": 2017,
        "emp": 1001420,
        "wage": 70010
      },
      {
        "y": 2018,
        "emp": 1060580,
        "wage": 70530
      },
      {
        "y": 2021,
        "emp": 1030330,
        "wage": 74670
      },
      {
        "y": 2022,
        "emp": 1081230,
        "wage": 75990
      },
      {
        "y": 2023,
        "emp": 1103440,
        "wage": 79590
      },
      {
        "y": 2024,
        "emp": 1128200,
        "wage": 81270
      },
      {
        "y": 2025,
        "emp": 1087090,
        "wage": 83050
      }
    ],
    "from": 2017,
    "to": 2025,
    "change_pct": 8.6,
    "comparable_from": 2019,
    "spans_soc_revision": true
  },
  "pivots": [
    {
      "slug": "chief-executives",
      "title": "Chief Executives",
      "verdict": "SAFE",
      "risk_resistance": 69,
      "median_wage": 213990,
      "overlap": 80,
      "skills_to_close": [
        "Management of Financial Resources",
        "Management of Personnel Resources",
        "Social Perceptiveness",
        "Management of Material Resources"
      ]
    },
    {
      "slug": "managers-all-other",
      "title": "Managers, All Other",
      "verdict": "EXPOSED",
      "risk_resistance": 46,
      "median_wage": 141900,
      "overlap": 76,
      "skills_to_close": [
        "Science",
        "Operation and Control"
      ]
    },
    {
      "slug": "emergency-management-directors",
      "title": "Emergency Management Directors",
      "verdict": "EXPOSED",
      "risk_resistance": 59,
      "median_wage": 93330,
      "overlap": 74,
      "skills_to_close": [
        "Service Orientation",
        "Learning Strategies",
        "Instructing",
        "Social Perceptiveness"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "license": "https://cookedindex.com/terms"
}