{
  "source": "Cooked Index — occupational AI risk register",
  "page": "https://cookedindex.com/jobs/editors/",
  "methodology": "https://cookedindex.com/methodology",
  "notice": "Verdicts are re-examined as evidence accumulates. Re-fetch before relying on this; the page above always carries the current score.",
  "scored_at": "2026-08-11",
  "model": "claude-opus-5",
  "occupation": {
    "title": "Editors",
    "soc_code": "27-3041",
    "category": "Media",
    "us_employment": 91690,
    "median_annual_wage": 77920
  },
  "verdict": "COOKED",
  "risk_resistance": 28,
  "contested": false,
  "near_boundary": false,
  "dimensions": {
    "task_resistance": 7,
    "embodiment": 2,
    "liability_shield": 1,
    "trust_premium": 7,
    "judgment_accountability": 11
  },
  "reasoning": {
    "task_resistance": "Line-level work — enforcing AP or Chicago style, cutting a 1,400-word feature to 900, generating six headline and dek variants, fixing subject-verb agreement, checking that a byline matches CMS metadata — is now a prompt away, and what pushes this to 7 rather than 4 is the residue that still needs a human in the room: pitching decisions in the morning meeting, calling a reporter to ask how they know a claim, and deciding a piece isn't ready to run.",
    "embodiment": "The job is a CMS, a style guide, and Slack; the only physical element left is print-era press checks and proofing physical galleys, which almost no one on this SOC code still does, hence 2 rather than 0.",
    "liability_shield": "There is no editorial licence, no board, no continuing-education requirement — anyone can hold the title tomorrow, and when a defamation claim lands it names the publisher and the corporate entity, not the editor who approved the copy.",
    "trust_premium": "Writers do choose to work with editors who improved their last piece, and freelancers follow trusted commissioning editors between outlets, but readers never learn who edited what — the relationship is with a few dozen contributors, not the audience paying for the product, which caps this at 7.",
    "judgment_accountability": "Deciding whether a single anonymous source is enough to publish, whether to hold a story for another day of reporting, or whether a correction needs to be a retraction are genuinely unscripted calls with real consequences — but they sit inside a masthead where an EIC, standards desk, or legal review signs off on the truly dangerous ones, keeping this at 11 instead of the high teens."
  },
  "rationale": "The bulk of editorial hours — copyediting, grammar and style enforcement, headline and SEO variants, trimming to length, rewriting weak drafts, formatting to house style — is exactly what language models do at usable quality and near-zero marginal cost. What survives is the commissioning and accountability tier: deciding what stories are worth running, judging whether a source claim holds up, managing writers, and owning the legal and reputational consequences of publication. The modal editor today spends far more time on the first list than the second, and there is no license or signature requirement anywhere to slow substitution.",
  "outlook": "Headcount keeps shrinking as copy and proofreading move to models; the editors who remain are fewer, more senior, and paid for taste, sourcing judgment, and being the person whose name is on the mistake.",
  "what_would_raise_it": {
    "levers": [
      {
        "dimension": "task_resistance",
        "change": "Task-mix shift is genuine here: if copyediting and headline generation are fully absorbed, the residual role is commissioning, source verification, and writer management — work that requires phone calls, relationships, and adjudicating contested claims. Watch for job postings retitled to 'standards editor' or 'verification editor' with no line-editing duties, as at Reuters and AP fact-check desks.",
        "plausibility": "already happening",
        "would_add": 4
      },
      {
        "dimension": "judgment_accountability",
        "change": "Publisher liability for AI-generated defamation landing on a named human: if courts hold (as plaintiffs are arguing in Walters v. OpenAI and similar suits) that Section 230 does not cover AI-generated output, outlets need a named editor who reviewed and approved each AI-assisted piece before publication. Watch for masthead 'editor of record' bylines on AI-assisted copy.",
        "plausibility": "plausible",
        "would_add": 4
      },
      {
        "dimension": "trust_premium",
        "change": "Certification schemes that require disclosed human editorial review as a condition of carriage or ad eligibility — e.g. NewsGuard criteria, the Content Authenticity Initiative / C2PA provenance labels, or a platform rule granting ranking preference to human-reviewed content. Also union contracts: the WGA 2023 MBA and several NewsGuild agreements already bar AI from replacing covered editorial work at specific shops.",
        "plausibility": "already happening",
        "would_add": 4
      },
      {
        "dimension": "liability_shield",
        "change": "No licensing route exists for editors and none is plausible — the First Amendment makes state licensure of editorial judgment effectively unavailable in the US. The nearest analogue is a contractual sign-off obligation (insurer requiring a named human approver for media liability coverage), which is a private requirement rather than a license and shifts this dimension only marginally.",
        "plausibility": "unlikely",
        "would_add": 1
      }
    ],
    "ceiling_note": "Even with every lever firing, the headcount question is separate from the score: a 'verification editor' role can be genuinely resistant while requiring one-fifth as many people as today's copydesk. Higher per-role resistance is compatible with steep occupational contraction."
  },
  "adjudication": null,
  "employment_history": {
    "points": [
      {
        "y": 2017,
        "emp": 96890,
        "wage": 58770
      },
      {
        "y": 2018,
        "emp": 95750,
        "wage": 59480
      },
      {
        "y": 2019,
        "emp": 95970,
        "wage": 61370
      },
      {
        "y": 2020,
        "emp": 93370,
        "wage": 63400
      },
      {
        "y": 2021,
        "emp": 88780,
        "wage": 63350
      },
      {
        "y": 2022,
        "emp": 101430,
        "wage": 73080
      },
      {
        "y": 2023,
        "emp": 95700,
        "wage": 75020
      },
      {
        "y": 2024,
        "emp": 95480,
        "wage": 75260
      },
      {
        "y": 2025,
        "emp": 91690,
        "wage": 77920
      }
    ],
    "from": 2017,
    "to": 2025,
    "change_pct": -5.4,
    "comparable_from": 2019,
    "spans_soc_revision": true
  },
  "pivots": [
    {
      "slug": "producers-and-directors",
      "title": "Producers and Directors",
      "verdict": "EXPOSED",
      "risk_resistance": 55,
      "median_wage": 90360,
      "overlap": 63,
      "skills_to_close": [
        "Management of Material Resources",
        "Management of Financial Resources",
        "Monitoring",
        "Coordination"
      ]
    },
    {
      "slug": "communications-teachers-postsecondary",
      "title": "Communications Teachers, Postsecondary",
      "verdict": "EXPOSED",
      "risk_resistance": 47,
      "median_wage": 78580,
      "overlap": 62,
      "skills_to_close": [
        "Instructing",
        "Learning Strategies",
        "Science",
        "Active Learning"
      ]
    },
    {
      "slug": "history-teachers-postsecondary",
      "title": "History Teachers, Postsecondary",
      "verdict": "EXPOSED",
      "risk_resistance": 47,
      "median_wage": 83820,
      "overlap": 61,
      "skills_to_close": [
        "Learning Strategies",
        "Instructing",
        "Science",
        "Active Learning"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "license": "https://cookedindex.com/terms"
}