{
  "source": "Cooked Index — occupational AI risk register",
  "page": "https://cookedindex.com/jobs/nuclear-technicians/",
  "methodology": "https://cookedindex.com/methodology",
  "notice": "Verdicts are re-examined as evidence accumulates. Re-fetch before relying on this; the page above always carries the current score.",
  "scored_at": "2026-08-11",
  "model": "claude-opus-5",
  "occupation": {
    "title": "Nuclear Technicians",
    "soc_code": "19-4051",
    "category": "Science",
    "us_employment": 6470,
    "median_annual_wage": 110240
  },
  "verdict": "EXPOSED",
  "risk_resistance": 50,
  "contested": false,
  "near_boundary": false,
  "dimensions": {
    "task_resistance": 11,
    "embodiment": 14,
    "liability_shield": 9,
    "trust_premium": 4,
    "judgment_accountability": 12
  },
  "reasoning": {
    "task_resistance": "Roughly half the shift is field work a machine can't yet do — smear surveys behind a valve gallery, whole-body counter setups, source checks on portal monitors, sampling primary coolant through a hot-lab hood — but the other half is dose trending, RWP writeups, log entries and effluent report generation that software already handles, which is what pulls this to 11 rather than the 15+ a purely hands-on trade would get.",
    "embodiment": "You work inside radiological control areas in anti-Cs, respirator or airline hood, in refuel outage heat and cramped containment penetrations where geometry, background and contamination change hour to hour — that's uncontrolled by any robotics standard — and it lands at 14 rather than higher because a meaningful share of hours are back in the count room, at the RP desk, or at a workstation.",
    "liability_shield": "You hold real quals — ANSI/ANS-3.1 health physics tech certification, site-specific requals, sometimes NRC-recognized RCT cards — and you sign surveys and RWPs, but the licence that legally matters belongs to the plant and the certified Radiation Protection Manager or licensed operator above you, so at 9 the credential gates who does the work without making you personally the licensed accountable party.",
    "trust_premium": "Nobody requests a technician by name; a survey record, a count sheet or a dose report is interchangeable between you and the tech on the opposite shift, and the 4 reflects only the working rapport with maintenance and outage crews who trust your briefings enough to enter an area without arguing.",
    "judgment_accountability": "Procedures and ALARA plans script most of the day, but you make live calls that matter — stop-work when a dose rate climbs mid-job, whether an alarm is real or a source-check artifact, whether a smear result means a contamination event or lab error, what stay-time to give a crew — and 12 rather than 15 because those calls escalate fast to RP supervision and the control room rather than ending with you."
  },
  "rationale": "Nuclear technicians spend real hours physically inside plants and labs — swiping contamination surveys, drawing coolant and effluent samples, calibrating and staging radiation detection instruments, escorting workers through controlled areas — and none of that is close to being roboticized in a hardened, high-consequence environment. What is exposed is the paperwork half of the job: trending dose data, filling radiological work permits, generating shift logs, writing routine survey and effluent reports, and flagging out-of-band readings, all of which software already does or will do. Certification (ANSI/ANS-3.1, NRR health physics tech quals, site-specific quals) plus a heavy NRC/utility procedural culture slows change more than the technology does; the shield is regulatory, not physical, and could be rewritten.",
  "outlook": "Employment stays small and roughly flat as reporting and dose-trending work collapses into software, while the field-survey, sampling, and outage-coverage tier holds and shifts toward decommissioning and new SMR sites.",
  "what_would_raise_it": {
    "levers": [
      {
        "dimension": "liability_shield",
        "change": "An NRC rule or license-condition change (e.g., in revision of Regulatory Guide 8.2/8.8 implementation or 10 CFR 20 recordkeeping requirements) that names a qualified/certified health physics technician as the individual who must review and sign radiological survey records, RWPs, and dose-assignment entries generated by software — making the certification the legal signature rather than a staffing convention. Watch also for ANSI/ANS-3.1 revision language on attestation for machine-generated radiological records.",
        "plausibility": "plausible",
        "would_add": 4
      },
      {
        "dimension": "liability_shield",
        "change": "SMR/advanced-reactor licensing (NuScale, X-energy, Kairos applications) settling minimum radiation-protection staffing per unit as an explicit license condition rather than leaving it to owner discretion — the same fight now running over minimum licensed operator staffing per 10 CFR 50.54(m) exemption requests. If techs get a floor written in, the shield hardens; if SMR staffing exemptions are granted broadly, it erodes instead.",
        "plausibility": "already happening",
        "would_add": 3
      },
      {
        "dimension": "judgment_accountability",
        "change": "Formal, individually held stop-work / suspend-entry authority for the RP technician written into the site radiological protection program and collective bargaining agreements (UWUA/IBEW utility locals), so the on-scene tech owns the containment-entry or dose-extension call rather than relaying a recommendation to an engineer.",
        "plausibility": "plausible",
        "would_add": 3
      },
      {
        "dimension": "task_resistance",
        "change": "Genuine two-tier job: if trending, log generation, effluent report drafting and out-of-band flagging are absorbed by software, the residual day is unplanned-work ALARA planning, hot-particle and smearable-contamination judgment, instrument response troubleshooting in high-field areas, and job coverage — work with no clean digital substitute. Task-mix shift alone raises this without any rule change.",
        "plausibility": "already happening",
        "would_add": 3
      },
      {
        "dimension": "embodiment",
        "change": "Decommissioning workload growth (Indian Point, Palisades restart work, Diablo Canyon lifetime extension surveys) shifting the national task mix toward MARSSIM final status surveys and characterization — dense, non-repeating, in-field measurement in degraded and unmapped geometries, which is the least roboticizable part of the occupation.",
        "plausibility": "already happening",
        "would_add": 2
      }
    ],
    "ceiling_note": "No realistic route to trust_premium: the buyer is a utility or national lab, not a person choosing a human, and procurement optimizes cost per survey. Also note the two liability levers point the same way as the SMR staffing-exemption fight — the same NRC process that could write a floor is currently being asked to waive one, so the shield is genuinely bidirectional here."
  },
  "adjudication": null,
  "employment_history": {
    "points": [
      {
        "y": 2017,
        "emp": 6850,
        "wage": 80370
      },
      {
        "y": 2018,
        "emp": 7230,
        "wage": 79140
      },
      {
        "y": 2019,
        "emp": 6420,
        "wage": 82080
      },
      {
        "y": 2020,
        "emp": 6160,
        "wage": 84190
      },
      {
        "y": 2021,
        "emp": 5360,
        "wage": 99340
      },
      {
        "y": 2022,
        "emp": 5880,
        "wage": 100420
      },
      {
        "y": 2023,
        "emp": 5400,
        "wage": 101740
      },
      {
        "y": 2024,
        "emp": 5990,
        "wage": 104240
      },
      {
        "y": 2025,
        "emp": 6470,
        "wage": 110240
      }
    ],
    "from": 2017,
    "to": 2025,
    "change_pct": -5.5,
    "comparable_from": 2019,
    "spans_soc_revision": true
  },
  "pivots": [
    {
      "slug": "nuclear-power-reactor-operators",
      "title": "Nuclear Power Reactor Operators",
      "verdict": "SAFE",
      "risk_resistance": 70,
      "median_wage": 122890,
      "overlap": 82,
      "skills_to_close": [
        "Operation and Control",
        "Complex Problem Solving",
        "Management of Personnel Resources"
      ]
    },
    {
      "slug": "electrical-and-electronics-repairers-powerhouse-substation-and-relay",
      "title": "Electrical and Electronics Repairers, Powerhouse, Substation, and Relay",
      "verdict": "SAFE",
      "risk_resistance": 68,
      "median_wage": 103020,
      "overlap": 69,
      "skills_to_close": [
        "Repairing",
        "Equipment Maintenance",
        "Equipment Selection",
        "Operations Analysis"
      ]
    },
    {
      "slug": "ship-engineers",
      "title": "Ship Engineers",
      "verdict": "SAFE",
      "risk_resistance": 73,
      "median_wage": 109530,
      "overlap": 66,
      "skills_to_close": [
        "Repairing",
        "Installation",
        "Equipment Maintenance",
        "Equipment Selection"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "license": "https://cookedindex.com/terms"
}