{
  "source": "Cooked Index — occupational AI risk register",
  "page": "https://cookedindex.com/jobs/occupational-health-and-safety-technicians/",
  "methodology": "https://cookedindex.com/methodology",
  "notice": "Verdicts are re-examined as evidence accumulates. Re-fetch before relying on this; the page above always carries the current score.",
  "scored_at": "2026-08-11",
  "model": "claude-opus-5",
  "occupation": {
    "title": "Occupational Health and Safety Technicians",
    "soc_code": "19-5012",
    "category": "Science",
    "us_employment": 30590,
    "median_annual_wage": 61560
  },
  "verdict": "EXPOSED",
  "risk_resistance": 43,
  "contested": false,
  "near_boundary": false,
  "dimensions": {
    "task_resistance": 10,
    "embodiment": 13,
    "liability_shield": 5,
    "trust_premium": 7,
    "judgment_accountability": 8
  },
  "reasoning": {
    "task_resistance": "Half your day — pulling a personal air sampling pump onto a worker's collar, calibrating a dosimeter, running quantitative respirator fit-tests, checking lockout/tagout tags and guard interlocks on a press line — cannot be done from a screen, but the other half (drafting the inspection writeup, coding injuries onto the OSHA 300 log, matching a finding to the right 1910 subpart, building the annual hazcom training deck, trending DART rates) is exactly what a model drafts in a first pass, which is what puts this at 10 rather than in the resistant band.",
    "embodiment": "You are on production floors, in confined-space entries, on scaffolds and roof edges, in noise above 85 dBA and around chemicals you're sampling for, wearing the PPE you enforce — 13 rather than 17 because the environments are industrial sites someone else already controls and hazard-mapped, not disaster scenes or open field work with no site owner.",
    "liability_shield": "OHST, CHST or CSP-track credentials get you hired and get you taken seriously in an OSHA walkaround, but no statute requires a licensed technician's signature on an air sampling result or a JHA — the CIH stamps the exposure assessment and the safety manager signs the abatement plan, which is why this sits at 5 and not at 2.",
    "trust_premium": "Plant supervisors and union safety reps let you into their areas, and shutting down a line goes smoother when the crew knows you, but the deliverable is a sample result, a log entry, or an inspection finding that stands on its own numbers — a different technician with the same pump gets the same reading, so the relationship smooths access rather than being the product.",
    "judgment_accountability": "You decide whether to sample this worker or that one, whether a guard gap is a recordable finding or a coaching moment, and whether to pull someone off a task on the spot — real calls made alone on the floor — but sampling strategy, exposure interpretation against PELs, and the citation-level decisions route to the CIH or safety manager, which caps this at 8."
  },
  "rationale": "The technician tier is built around going to the site: walking production floors, running noise dosimeters and air sampling pumps, checking machine guarding, fit-testing respirators — none of which a model does. But the paperwork half of the job (writing inspection reports, coding OSHA 300 logs, cross-referencing standards, building safety training decks, trending incident data) is already largely drafted by AI, and the technician role is defined as data collection under a safety manager's or CIH's direction, so the consequential calls and the liability sit above you. Certification (OHST, CSP-track) is employer-preferred, not legally mandated, so there's no signature moat.",
  "outlook": "Headcount holds up in manufacturing, construction, and energy because someone must physically be in the plant, but the report-writing and recordkeeping share of the day shrinks hard, pushing the job toward field instrumentation and the certified assessor tier.",
  "what_would_raise_it": {
    "levers": [
      {
        "dimension": "liability_shield",
        "change": "OSHA's proposed/perennially-discussed rule tightening who may perform and certify exposure monitoring: several substance-specific standards (lead, silica, beryllium) already require sampling be done under a 'competent person' or that respirator fit-testing follow 1910.134 appendix protocols. A rulemaking or state-plan amendment (Cal/OSHA has moved this way on heat and silica) requiring that quantitative fit tests and personal air sampling be conducted and signed by a person holding a named credential (OHST/CIH-supervised with documented individual attestation) would create a real signature line the technician personally owns.",
        "plausibility": "plausible",
        "would_add": 4
      },
      {
        "dimension": "liability_shield",
        "change": "Workers' comp carrier and insurer requirements: some carriers already condition premium credits on documented walkthroughs by a credentialed safety professional. If large carriers (Travelers, Zurich construction books) begin requiring a named certified technician's signed field verification — not an AI-generated report — for loss-control credits, the credential becomes contractually mandatory even without statute.",
        "plausibility": "already happening",
        "would_add": 3
      },
      {
        "dimension": "task_resistance",
        "change": "Task-mix shift: this role genuinely has two tiers. If report drafting, 300-log coding and standards cross-referencing are fully absorbed, the residual day is instrument calibration, sampling-strategy design under NIOSH/AIHA methods, judging whether a guard is defeated in practice, and interviewing workers about actual practice vs. written procedure — all resistant. Score rises as a share-of-day effect, with headcount pressure alongside it.",
        "plausibility": "already happening",
        "would_add": 4
      },
      {
        "dimension": "judgment_accountability",
        "change": "Imminent-danger stop-work authority written into the role rather than escalated. Several building-trades union agreements and owner-controlled insurance programs on large construction projects already grant designated safety personnel unilateral stop-work authority; if that authority is formally delegated to the technician tier in contract language (rather than reserved to the safety manager), the technician owns a consequential ambiguous call in real time.",
        "plausibility": "plausible",
        "would_add": 4
      },
      {
        "dimension": "embodiment",
        "change": "Expansion of scope into confined-space entry attendant/entrant duties, respirator fit-testing on rotating shifts, and post-incident scene preservation — unpredictable-environment work that cannot be scheduled or remotely instrumented. Sensor networks pull the opposite way for fixed-plant monitoring, so this is a scope change, not a trend.",
        "plausibility": "plausible",
        "would_add": 2
      }
    ],
    "ceiling_note": "Trust premium has no realistic route: the buyer is an employer purchasing compliance documentation at lowest defensible cost, not a client who prefers a human. Fixed continuous-monitoring sensor networks also actively erode the embodiment score in stable industrial settings, so the embodiment lever only holds where environments change daily (construction, emergency response). Even with the liability levers, the ceiling sits near the low-60s because the credential is credential-preferred by employers and insurers rather than statutorily exclusive."
  },
  "adjudication": null,
  "employment_history": {
    "points": [
      {
        "y": 2019,
        "emp": 20580,
        "wage": 51550
      },
      {
        "y": 2020,
        "emp": 20950,
        "wage": 53340
      },
      {
        "y": 2021,
        "emp": 21750,
        "wage": 51120
      },
      {
        "y": 2022,
        "emp": 23670,
        "wage": 57970
      },
      {
        "y": 2023,
        "emp": 27270,
        "wage": 57920
      },
      {
        "y": 2024,
        "emp": 31450,
        "wage": 58440
      },
      {
        "y": 2025,
        "emp": 30590,
        "wage": 61560
      }
    ],
    "from": 2019,
    "to": 2025,
    "change_pct": 48.6,
    "comparable_from": 2019,
    "spans_soc_revision": false
  },
  "pivots": [
    {
      "slug": "construction-and-building-inspectors",
      "title": "Construction and Building Inspectors",
      "verdict": "EXPOSED",
      "risk_resistance": 64,
      "median_wage": 74690,
      "overlap": 75,
      "skills_to_close": [
        "Equipment Selection",
        "Mathematics"
      ]
    },
    {
      "slug": "fire-inspectors-and-investigators",
      "title": "Fire Inspectors and Investigators",
      "verdict": "SAFE",
      "risk_resistance": 68,
      "median_wage": 75920,
      "overlap": 69,
      "skills_to_close": []
    },
    {
      "slug": "conservation-scientists",
      "title": "Conservation Scientists",
      "verdict": "EXPOSED",
      "risk_resistance": 56,
      "median_wage": 73010,
      "overlap": 69,
      "skills_to_close": [
        "Operations Analysis"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "license": "https://cookedindex.com/terms"
}