{
  "source": "Cooked Index — occupational AI risk register",
  "page": "https://cookedindex.com/jobs/radiation-therapists/",
  "methodology": "https://cookedindex.com/methodology",
  "notice": "Verdicts are re-examined as evidence accumulates. Re-fetch before relying on this; the page above always carries the current score.",
  "scored_at": "2026-08-11",
  "model": "claude-opus-5",
  "occupation": {
    "title": "Radiation Therapists",
    "soc_code": "29-1124",
    "category": "Healthcare",
    "us_employment": 17070,
    "median_annual_wage": 105310
  },
  "verdict": "SAFE",
  "risk_resistance": 67,
  "contested": false,
  "near_boundary": true,
  "dimensions": {
    "task_resistance": 13,
    "embodiment": 17,
    "liability_shield": 13,
    "trust_premium": 14,
    "judgment_accountability": 10
  },
  "reasoning": {
    "task_resistance": "At 13 the manual setup — immobilization masks, tattoo/surface-mark alignment, couch shifts from CBCT match, and daily side-effect checks — stays human, but a real share of the shift (record-and-verify checks, IGRT auto-registration, chart QA, ARIA/Mosaiq documentation, appointment sequencing) is already being handed to software, which is what keeps it out of the 14+ band.",
    "embodiment": "17 reflects that the work happens with hands on a semi-clothed, sometimes nauseated or intubated patient in a vault, lifting and rolling them onto an index bar, seating a thermoplastic mask, and clearing a 6 MV gantry's collision path — variable bodies and variable rooms, though the machine and the vault itself are fixed and controlled, which is why it isn't 19.",
    "liability_shield": "13 fits ARRT(T) certification plus state licensure in most states, with the therapist personally signing the daily treatment record and the wrong-site/wrong-dose misadministration reportable under state radiation control regs — but the prescription, dose, and plan approval belong to the radiation oncologist and medical physicist, so the deepest liability sits above you.",
    "trust_premium": "14 is earned by 25-40 consecutive weekday appointments where you are the one who notices the skin breakdown, the weight loss loosening the mask fit, and the patient who stopped talking — continuity no one else on the care team has — while the referral and the trust in the treatment itself still route through the oncologist.",
    "judgment_accountability": "10 is right because the prescription, fractionation, and tolerances are written for you and out-of-tolerance shifts get escalated to physics or the physician, but you decide in real time whether today's match is good enough to treat, whether a shift needs a re-sim, and whether to stop the beam — genuine calls made alone in the console, inside a defined envelope."
  },
  "rationale": "The job is physically positioning frightened, often frail patients to sub-millimeter tolerance on a linear accelerator, verifying setup against imaging, and running the beam — none of which current robotics can do in an uncontrolled clinical room. AI is already absorbing the adjacent screen work (treatment plan checks, auto-contouring, image registration, dose record documentation, scheduling), so the informatics side of the role thins while the daily hands-on delivery persists. Patients see the same therapist every weekday for six weeks, which makes the relationship, not the button-press, the durable part.",
  "outlook": "Headcount stays roughly flat to slightly up with cancer incidence; AI takes the planning and documentation hours, so the surviving job is more patient-side and more precision-setup than it is today.",
  "what_would_raise_it": {
    "levers": [
      {
        "dimension": "liability_shield",
        "change": "State radiologic technologist licensure laws (e.g. the long-pending federal CARE Act, plus states like Idaho/Missouri that still lack RT licensure) extending mandatory licensure to all radiation therapists, combined with ARRT/ASRT-backed rules requiring a licensed therapist to personally attest to daily setup verification and any AI-suggested shift before beam-on — making the attestation individually, not institutionally, liable",
        "plausibility": "plausible",
        "would_add": 3
      },
      {
        "dimension": "liability_shield",
        "change": "NRC/state radiation-control 'medical event' reporting rules or a Joint Commission element of performance naming a credentialed therapist as the required human check on AI-generated online adaptive replans (as on Varian Ethos / Elekta Unity workflows), so an autonomous adaptive plan cannot be delivered unsigned",
        "plausibility": "already happening",
        "would_add": 2
      },
      {
        "dimension": "task_resistance",
        "change": "Task-mix shift as auto-contouring, plan QA and dose documentation are absorbed: the residual day becomes adaptive-therapy decision support, immobilization problem-solving on frail/pediatric/claustrophobic patients, and toxicity triage — the tier machines can't reach. Genuine two-tier occupation, and the routine tier is the one already going",
        "plausibility": "already happening",
        "would_add": 2
      },
      {
        "dimension": "judgment_accountability",
        "change": "Formal adoption of online adaptive radiotherapy at scale, where the therapist at console owns the accept/reject call on a daily AI-recontoured plan under time pressure with the patient on the table — ASTRO/AAPM guidance (e.g. AAPM TG-report work on adaptive QA) codifying that authority rather than routing it to a physicist",
        "plausibility": "plausible",
        "would_add": 4
      },
      {
        "dimension": "trust_premium",
        "change": "Limited route. Patients do not select their therapist and payment is bundled per-fraction under Medicare's radiation oncology payment structures, so there is no consumer-side price signal for a human. The only realistic lift is proton/pediatric/SBRT centers marketing named continuity-of-care teams, which is marginal",
        "plausibility": "unlikely",
        "would_add": 1
      }
    ],
    "ceiling_note": "Embodiment is near its practical maximum at 17 and cannot rise much; the honest risk is not displacement but headcount compression per linac as adaptive automation lets one therapist cover more fractions, which the register's dimensions don't capture."
  },
  "adjudication": {
    "method": "two independent runs agreed on the verdict",
    "outcome": "corroborated",
    "run_totals": [
      67,
      70
    ],
    "run_verdicts": [
      "SAFE",
      "SAFE"
    ]
  },
  "employment_history": {
    "points": [
      {
        "y": 2017,
        "emp": 17250,
        "wage": 80570
      },
      {
        "y": 2018,
        "emp": 18260,
        "wage": 82330
      },
      {
        "y": 2019,
        "emp": 17860,
        "wage": 85560
      },
      {
        "y": 2020,
        "emp": 17390,
        "wage": 86850
      },
      {
        "y": 2021,
        "emp": 16050,
        "wage": 82790
      },
      {
        "y": 2022,
        "emp": 15510,
        "wage": 89530
      },
      {
        "y": 2023,
        "emp": 16640,
        "wage": 98300
      },
      {
        "y": 2024,
        "emp": 18700,
        "wage": 101990
      },
      {
        "y": 2025,
        "emp": 17070,
        "wage": 105310
      }
    ],
    "from": 2017,
    "to": 2025,
    "change_pct": -1,
    "comparable_from": 2019,
    "spans_soc_revision": true
  },
  "pivots": [],
  "license": "https://cookedindex.com/terms"
}