← Risk register SOC 13-2011 · reviewed 2026-08-11

Accountants and Auditors

1,449,500 US workers · median $83,680/yr · Business

EXPOSED

The bulk of hours at the national median go to reconciliations, journal entries, transaction tie-outs, variance schedules, tax return prep and workpaper documentation — all structured text-and-number work that AI plus modern ledger software already does at usable quality. What survives is the part where a licensed human signs: the audit opinion, the tax position taken under ambiguous law, the materiality and going-concern call, and the conversation with a client or audit committee about what the numbers actually mean. This title bundles the staff accountant (highly exposed) with the CPA partner and controller (well protected); the modal worker sits closer to the exposed end.

10-year outlook: Headcount in preparation and testing roles shrinks materially over ten years while demand holds for licensed signers, controllers and specialty tax advisors — the pyramid narrows at the bottom, and the path from junior to signer gets steeper.

Score — 42/100 resistance

Five dimensions, 0–20 each, summed. Higher means more protected. The arithmetic is shown so you can check it: 7 + 2 + 11 + 10 + 12 = 42.

Task resistance 7/20

Mixed — a routine tier and a judgment tier. A 7 reflects that bank and intercompany reconciliations, three-way match testing, sampling selection, depreciation schedules, and Form 1120/1065 preparation from a trial balance are now largely tool-driven, while a residue of hours — walkthroughs of a client's controls, chasing an unexplained accrual through emails and contracts, drafting footnote disclosures for a new revenue arrangement — still requires someone assembling facts nobody has coded yet, which is why this sits at the top of the automatable band rather than at 3.

Embodiment 2/20

Fully desk- and screen-based. A 2 covers the thin physical tail: inventory observation counts on a warehouse floor at year-end, fixed-asset existence checks, and cash counts at a client site, which for the median accountant is a few days a year against a calendar of ERP screens, Excel, and workpaper software.

Liability shield 11/20

Licensed human required and personally liable. An 11 sits just inside the licensed band because the CPA licence is legally load-bearing only at the top of the workpaper — the engagement partner signs the opinion and faces PCAOB sanction, state board discipline, and Section 10A exposure, while the staff and senior accountants who do most of the tick-and-tie, and the entire uncredentialled corporate accounting population under a controller, hold no licence that anyone must have on file.

Trust premium 10/20

Some relationship component. A 10 reflects that clients rehire the partner and the controller keeps the CFO's confidence through years of knowing which estimates that company fudges, but the reconciliation and return-prep work below that is routinely offshored to shared service centres and rotated among staff without a client noticing — the relationship carries the engagement, not the deliverable.

Judgment & accountability 12/20

Meaningful discretion. A 12 marks the genuine discretion that exists — setting materiality thresholds, deciding whether a contingency is probable and estimable under ASC 450, taking a tax position on economic substance, judging whether management's going-concern plans are realistic — against the fact that most of these calls run through GAAP, IRS regulation, and firm methodology templates with a reviewer above the preparer, so the ambiguous call is escalated rather than owned by the person who found it.

Confidence: high · reviewed 2026-08-11 · how scoring works · 1 deployment report on file

Tasks already automatable

What survives

Active moats: licensure, liability, judgment

How to future-proof this job

Escape hatches — adjacent fields with better verdicts

Computed from U.S. Dept. of Labor O*NET skill profiles: high overlap with what you already do, materially higher resistance score.

Lawyers SAFE · 67/100 · you already have ~65% of the skill profile

Skills to close: Negotiation, Persuasion, Speaking, Operations Analysis

Who is actually doing this

The score above is about what the work exposes. This is reporting about real deployments in this occupation — the difference between "could be automated" and "somebody automated it."

Goldman Sachs

Field report — do you do this job?

Has AI actually changed your work?

Self-reported and unverified — a sentiment signal, not a survey. One response per person per occupation; you can change your answer.

From people who do this job

Nobody has filed one yet. If you do this work, you know things the rubric can't see.

What has actually changed in your work?

Concrete beats general: a tool that arrived, a task that moved, a headcount decision you watched happen. Don't include anything that identifies you or your employer if that would put you at risk.