← Risk register SOC 43-4031 · reviewed 2026-08-11

Court, Municipal, and License Clerks

179,750 US workers · median $48,700/yr · Office

COOKED

The bulk of this work — reviewing license applications for completeness, entering case data, preparing dockets and calendars, calculating and receipting fees, issuing routine certificates and permits — is exactly the structured form-and-record processing that online portals plus AI intake now handle end to end. What holds is the in-person counter and courtroom presence: swearing witnesses, handling paper filings and evidence, calming distressed litigants, and certifying records under statutory authority. The modal worker is a records-and-counter clerk in a municipal office, not a deputy clerk of court running a courtroom; the latter tier is meaningfully more protected.

10-year outlook: Expect steady headcount decline over ten years as e-filing, self-service licensing portals, and automated docketing absorb the processing work, with surviving jobs concentrated in courtroom deputy clerk roles and certified records custodianship.

US employment, 2019–2025+16.7%
154,020179,750 workers

Headcount grew steadily across the period.

Median pay $39,380 → $48,700 -1.1% in real terms (nominal +23.7%, less ~25% US inflation over the period)

The job count is not the verdict

This line is counted by the Bureau of Labor Statistics — the one figure on this page that isn't a judgement of ours. Headcount moves on demand, offshoring, demographics and the business cycle, and automation is one term among several, often not the loudest.

So a falling line is not evidence that AI did it, and a rising one is not evidence that it won't. Both happen in this register: some occupations resist automation and shrink anyway, others are highly automatable and keep growing. The marked year is 2020.

BLS projection, 2024–2034

+3% 180,400 → 185,900 on the projections basis

Exposed, but growing

AI can already do a lot of these tasks, and the BLS still expects +3% more of these jobs by 2034. Demand for the output is growing faster than the work is being automated away — the mechanism BLS gives for software developers, and the combination people most often misread as an error.

Different clocks. The score is what current AI could do to this work today. The projection is how many of these jobs will exist in 2034. Everything between the two — how fast employers actually adopt, whether demand grows in the meantime — is why they can point opposite ways without either being wrong.

~18,500 openings a year on average, including replacing people who leave.

One email if this score changes. Watch as many occupations as you like from the same address — no account, and nothing is sent on a schedule, only when a verdict actually moves.

Also known as — 24 job titles this covers

Titles reported by people doing this work, from the US Department of Labor's O*NET survey. If your job title is here, this page is about your work even though the name doesn't match.

CrierRecorderRegisterLaw ClerkRegistrarTag ClerkTax ClerkCase ClerkCity ClerkTown ClerkCivil ClerkCourt ClerkCourt CrierCounty ClerkDocket ClerkDog LicenserFelony ClerkMinute ClerkAppeals ClerkCircuit ClerkCity RecorderLicense ClerkTraffic ClerkUtility Clerk

Score — 32/100 resistance

Holding it up: liability shield (8/20). Weakest point: task resistance (5/20).

Five dimensions, 0–20 each, summed. Higher means more protected. The arithmetic is shown so you can check it: 5 + 7 + 8 + 6 + 6 = 32. · Scored 2026-08-11, and re-examined when evidence accumulates rather than on a schedule.

Task resistance 5/20

Core tasks are already automatable Checking a marriage-license application against a statutory checklist, keying case captions and dispositions into Odyssey or Tyler, generating the next-term docket from filing dates, and receipting a fine to the right fund code are all rule-bound steps that e-filing portals and self-service license kiosks already execute without a clerk in the loop, which is why this sits at 5 rather than mid-range.

Embodiment 7/20

Some physical or field component A 7 reflects the real physical residue: stamping and date-filing paper pleadings, pulling and refiling case jackets, taking custody of exhibits, notarizing in person, and standing at a public counter — all inside a climate-controlled courthouse or city hall, not in the field, so nothing here approaches the uncontrolled-environment band.

Liability shield 8/20

Certification preferred, not legally required Deputy clerks are typically sworn or bonded and certify records under state statute, and some states require a certified municipal clerk credential, but the seal derives from the office rather than a personal professional licence — a judge or city attorney absorbs consequences for a bad ruling or ordinance, and 8 marks that oath-and-bond middle ground rather than 12-plus personal exposure.

Trust premium 6/20

Some relationship component At 6, the counter interaction matters — regulars filing recurring permits, a pro se litigant who needs the same instruction three times — but the public is transacting with the clerk's office, not choosing you, and nobody drives to the next county because they prefer a particular clerk.

Judgment & accountability 6/20

Executes defined procedures on defined inputs The recurring calls — is this filing timely, does this application lack a required document, what fee schedule applies, is this record sealed — resolve against court rules, ordinances, and retention schedules, and the standing instruction on genuine ambiguity is to refer it to the judge or clerk of court, which caps discretion at 6.

Scored twice. An independent second run returned 32/100 — COOKED, agreeing with the verdict above.

This score sits on a verdict boundary. At 32/100 it is one point from EXPOSED. Re-scoring moves results by a point or two, so here the score is more informative than the label.

Confidence: high · reviewed 2026-08-11 · how scoring works

What this job involves — and which parts are yours

The verdict above describes this occupation as a whole. Almost nobody does the typical version of a job — tick what's actually in your week and see how your own mix sits.

AI already does these at usable quality

These still need a person

Active moats on the surviving side: licensure, physical-presence

How to future-proof this job

Training paths for your skill gaps: MIT OpenCourseWare — problem-solving and analytical method courses free · MIT OpenCourseWare — full course materials across every department, free free · Coursera — negotiation courses, audit free free to audit · Coursera — critical thinking and logic, audit free free to audit

All 35 skills ranked by how many jobs they open →

Where this experience transfers — occupations you could move toward

Computed from U.S. Dept. of Labor O*NET skill and knowledge profiles: high overlap with what you already do, a materially higher resistance score, no large jump in required training, and no licence you would have to start a new pipeline to get. Targets that pay meaningfully less, that are themselves COOKED, or whose own headcount is falling are excluded — a move into a shrinking trade is not an escape.

Private Detectives and Investigators EXPOSED · 56/100 · you already have ~62% of the skill profile

Skills to close: Complex Problem Solving, Active Learning, Negotiation, Critical Thinking

What would move this back up — beyond any one person

The moves above are yours to make. This is the other half: what would have to change in the world for the occupation itself to score higher. None of it is in any one person's gift, but it is where the floor actually comes from. Scores here are not a one-way ratchet. Only two of the five dimensions — task resistance and embodiment — track what machines can do. The other three track law, what buyers will pay for, and who is answerable, and those move in both directions, often in response to the same pressure AI creates. If every lever below landed, this occupation would score around 45/100 — EXPOSED.

4 specific changes that would raise this score
  • already happening task resistance +3

    Genuine two-tier occupation: the routine tier (data entry, fee receipting, form completeness) automates first, leaving courtroom deputy work — swearing witnesses, real-time minute entries during hearings, exhibit custody, chain-of-custody logging, handling self-represented and distressed litigants at the counter. If a jurisdiction consolidates staffing so remaining clerks are courtroom/records-custodian deputies rather than intake processors, measured resistance of the remaining job rises even with no new law.

  • plausible liability shield +4

    State statutes and court rules that name a specific human deputy clerk as the officer who attests, certifies, and affixes the seal to filings and records — e.g. rules requiring a sworn clerk's signature for certified copies, writs, and judgment entries, and state e-filing rules (as in several state judicial council orders) that make the clerk personally responsible for accepting or rejecting a filing. If a state expands this to require a named clerk to countersign any AI-assisted docket entry or case-initiation decision, and to be answerable for defects, the shield rises. Also notary-commission and oath-administration statutes reserving these acts to a commissioned human.

  • plausible judgment accountability +4

    Task-mix shift plus explicit rule assignment: as portals absorb intake, the residual work is the clerk's quasi-judicial calls — rejecting a non-conforming filing, sealing or redacting under privacy rules, setting or rescheduling calendar conflicts, determining indigency/fee-waiver eligibility, issuing bench warrants or marriage licenses where statute gives the clerk discretion. If a court adopts a written policy that AI output on these is advisory only and the clerk owns the call (mirroring how some courts already forbid automated rejection of pro se filings), accountability concentrates in the surviving role.

  • plausible embodiment +2

    Physical evidence and paper-original custody rules: statutes and evidence rules requiring wet-ink originals for wills, land records, bonds, and sealed exhibits, plus in-person identity verification for marriage licenses and some vital records. If states resist remote/electronic marriage licensing and keep original-document custody duties with the clerk's office, the physical component holds.

The limit. Even with every lever, this stays in the low-to-mid range: the modal worker is a municipal counter clerk, and the protections attach to the smaller deputy-clerk-of-court tier. Trust premium has no realistic route — no member of the public chooses a courthouse or DMV for its human staff, and budget pressure runs the other way. Headcount decline can coexist with rising scores for those who remain.

These are conditions, not forecasts — what would have to happen, not what will. Specific rules, cases and bills are named so you can go and check whether they exist and where they stand; verify before relying on any of them. Nothing here is legal or financial advice.

Where this work is, and what it pays there

BLS metro figures for 362 areas. The verdict above does not change by city — the rubric judges what the work involves, not where it happens — but pay and headcount do, and the national median hides a very wide range.

Most of these jobs

New York-Newark-Jersey City, NY-NJ 9,340 $59,320 +22%
Chicago-Naperville-Elgin, IL-IN 4,590 $48,560 +0%
Denver-Aurora-Centennial, CO 3,600 $51,110 +5%
Miami-Fort Lauderdale-West Palm Beach, FL 3,350 $48,940 +0%
Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington, MN-WI 3,100 $57,180 +17%
Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands, TX 3,030 $48,930 +0%
Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington, TX 2,840 $49,030 +1%
Boston-Cambridge-Newton, MA-NH 2,580 $62,850 +29%

Best paid

San Jose-Sunnyvale-Santa Clara, CA 550 $83,490 +71%
Seattle-Tacoma-Bellevue, WA 1,240 $77,860 +60%
San Francisco-Oakland-Fremont, CA 1,820 $77,750 +60%

Percentages are against this occupation's national median of $48,700. Counts are jobs in that metro, not vacancies. Metros where the BLS suppressed the cell are absent rather than shown as zero.

Who is actually doing this

The score above is about what the work exposes. This is reporting about real deployments in this occupation — the difference between "could be automated" and "somebody automated it."

Heber City

1 of 1 reported case, with sources

Quick take — do you do this job?

Has AI actually changed your work? One tap, anonymous, and the running tally is public. Nothing else is asked of you.

Self-reported and unverified — a sentiment signal, not a survey. One response per person per occupation; you can change your answer.

Field reports — what people say has changed

No field reports yet. A written account takes a paragraph rather than a tap, goes to an editor before it appears, and is the one thing on this page the rubric cannot produce on its own.

File a field report

Concrete beats general: a tool that arrived, a task that moved, a headcount decision you watched happen. Don't include anything that identifies you or your employer if that would put you at risk.

Watch this verdict
Kept current

Rather than check back: get the digest and we'll tell you what changed — or watch a single occupation from its own page.