SAFE
The core of this job — reading load charts against actual ground conditions, judging wind and swing, coordinating with a rigger and signal person on a changing job site, and lifting a multi-ton load over people and live structures — is embodied judgment that language AI cannot touch and current robotics cannot reliably replicate outside fixed paths. The real automation pressure is narrow but genuine: automated stacking and gantry cranes have already displaced operators at container terminals and some steel mills, where the travel path is repeatable and the environment is fenced. OSHA-mandated operator certification (NCCCO or equivalent) plus personal exposure when a lift goes wrong keeps a licensed human in the seat on construction and mobile work.
This fall is concentrated in 2020 and has not recovered since.
Median pay $56,690 → $68,080 -3.9% in real terms
This line is counted by the Bureau of Labor Statistics — the one figure on this page that isn't a judgement of ours. Headcount moves on demand, offshoring, demographics and the business cycle, and automation is one term among several, often not the loudest.
So a falling line is not evidence that AI did it, and a rising one is not evidence that it won't. Both happen in this register: some occupations resist automation and shrink anyway, others are highly automatable and keep growing. The marked year is 2020.
BLS projection, 2024–2034
+3% 42,300 → 43,500 on the projections basis
Hard to automate, and growing
The work resists current AI and the BLS projects +3% more of these jobs by 2034. Note that safe does not mean well paid — several of the fastest-growing resistant occupations are among the lowest paid on the register.
Different clocks. The score is what current AI could do to this work today. The projection is how many of these jobs will exist in 2034. Everything between the two — how fast employers actually adopt, whether demand grows in the meantime — is why they can point opposite ways without either being wrong.
~3,800 openings a year on average, including replacing people who leave.
StripperWinchmanDerrickmanMold ShakerMold WasherCrane DriverMold ShifterDross SkimmerCrane OperatorIngot StripperPicker OperatorCathead OperatorDerrick OperatorMachine OperatorTower TechnicianWhirley OperatorBoom Cat OperatorMonorail OperatorBoomswing OperatorClamshell OperatorCrane Ladle PersonEquipment OperatorPit Crane OperatorAcid Crane Operator
Holding it up: embodiment . Weakest point: trust premium .
Tasks largely resist digitisation Setting outriggers on unknown soil, re-checking a load chart when the boom angle changes mid-lift, and taking hand signals from a rigger you cannot see are tasks that stay at 16 rather than 20 only because container gantries and automated stacking cranes have already proven that a fixed rail and a fenced yard can run without a cab operator.
Hands-on in uncontrolled environments An 18 reflects that you climb a tower ladder in the weather, feel the swing through the sticks, watch for power lines and pedestrians below, and work from a seat that moves with the machine — none of which happens on a screen; it is not 20 because the actual control input is levers and pedals, which is the one part a machine can copy.
Licensed human required and personally liable OSHA 1926.1427 requires certification by an accredited body (NCCCO or equivalent) plus employer evaluation for the specific equipment and configuration, and after a dropped load your card and your name are in the citation — the 12 rather than 16 reflects that this is a federal certification tied to crane type and capacity, not a state professional licence with an independent board that can strip your livelihood.
Exists to be accountable for ambiguous calls The call to stop a lift on wind, refuse a configuration the chart will not support, or override a signal person you think is wrong is yours alone and unreviewable in the moment, which puts it at 14; it stops short of higher because lift plans, capacity charts, and manufacturer limits define the envelope before you ever pick up the load.
The verdict above describes this occupation as a whole. Almost nobody does the typical version of a job — tick what's actually in your week and see how your own mix sits.
Your task mix speaks to task resistance (16/20 here) — how much of the day's work current AI already does. That is the dimension the boxes above are about.
It cannot move the other three. Liability shield (12/20) is whether the law requires a licensed human to sign. Trust premium (7/20) is whether buyers specifically pay for a person. Judgment and accountability (14/20) is whether the role exists to own consequential calls. Those are facts about the occupation's standing, not about which tasks are in your week — a paralegal who does only trial exhibits still holds no licence. Together they are 33 of this occupation's 67 points (49%).
Embodiment (18/20) is also a property of the work rather than the worker, but we don't tag individual tasks as physical or not, so the picker can't tell you anything about it. That's a limit of this tool, not a claim.
Did we get the list right? Tell us what's missing — the tasks are written from the outside, and you're reading this from the inside.
The moves above are yours to make. This is the other half: what would have to change in the world for the occupation itself to score higher. None of it is in any one person's gift, but it is where the floor actually comes from. Scores here are not a one-way ratchet. Only two of the five dimensions — task resistance and embodiment — track what machines can do. The other three track law, what buyers will pay for, and who is answerable, and those move in both directions, often in response to the same pressure AI creates. If every lever below landed, this occupation would score around 76/100, still SAFE.
Formal expansion of the 'critical lift' regime — multi-crane picks, lifts over occupied structures, personnel platform lifts — where a named certified operator signs off on load chart derates, ground bearing pressure, and wind hold decisions alongside the lift director. ASME B30.5 revisions and owner-side (refinery, utility, nuclear) contractor prequalification already push this documentation; more of it makes the operator the accountable decision-holder rather than a control-mover.
If automated stacking cranes continue absorbing the repeatable, fenced, fixed-path work at container terminals and mills, the residual occupation is disproportionately mobile/crawler/tower work on non-repeating sites — blind picks, tandem lifts, wind-limit judgment, rigger coordination. Task-mix shift raises the average judgment content of what remains even as headcount falls. Watch terminal automation announcements (e.g. Long Beach, Virginia) against BLS mobile-crane employment separately.
OSHA's crane rule (29 CFR 1926.1427) already requires a certified operator by crane type/capacity; a revision — or a state adoption like California Cal/OSHA's separate crane certificate — that explicitly bars remote or semi-autonomous operation on construction sites without a certified operator physically at the controls, and names that operator as the responsible party on the lift plan, would harden the seat. Similarly, a crane insurer (e.g. NBIS, the dominant crane/rigging underwriter) writing policy language voiding coverage for lifts executed under automated path control without a certified operator signing the critical-lift plan.
The limit. Trust premium has no realistic route: the buyer is a GC or terminal operator purchasing tonnage moved safely, not a named human, and no client pays extra to know a person was in the cab. Note also that task_resistance/embodiment gains here come with shrinking headcount — the job gets harder to automate while there are fewer of them.
| Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands, TX | 2,100 | $75,500 +11% |
| Chicago-Naperville-Elgin, IL-IN | 1,880 | $55,890 -18% |
| New York-Newark-Jersey City, NY-NJ | 1,500 | $100,640 +48% |
| Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington, TX | 1,310 | $68,640 +1% |
| Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington, PA-NJ-DE-MD | 790 | $72,010 +6% |
| Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Roswell, GA | 660 | $62,910 -8% |
| Detroit-Warren-Dearborn, MI | 650 | $59,740 -12% |
| Phoenix-Mesa-Chandler, AZ | 630 | $72,580 +7% |
| Worcester, MA | 110 | $122,260 +80% |
| Urban Honolulu, HI | 170 | $120,560 +77% |
| Kennewick-Richland, WA | 40 | $120,310 +77% |
North Sea Terminal Bremerhaven · Husky Terminal, Port of Tacoma
German outlet buten un binnen reports that planned automation at the North Sea Terminal Bremerhaven is expected to halve the terminal's workforce.
Port of Tacoma dockworkers publicly objected to an automation plan at Husky Terminal, saying it could reduce longshore jobs, as reported by the Tacoma News Tribune.
Has AI actually changed your work? One tap, anonymous, and the running tally is public. Nothing else is asked of you.
Rather than check back: get the digest and we'll tell you what changed — or watch a single occupation from its own page.