← Risk register SOC 11-9039 · reviewed 2026-08-11

Education Administrators, All Other

55,130 US workers · median $95,200/yr · Management

EXPOSED

This is a residual bucket — program directors, accreditation and compliance administrators, deans of specialized units, corporate and correctional education managers — so the modal worker splits time between paperwork (accreditation self-studies, enrollment reports, budget narratives, course schedules, grant compliance filings) and human work (supervising instructors, resolving student and parent disputes, negotiating with agencies and funders). The paperwork half is squarely in reach of current AI, which drafts policy language, reconciles data, and assembles compliance packets faster than a small admin office can. What holds is the person who owns the decision when a faculty member is failing, an accreditor raises a finding, or a program has to be cut — and who signs their name to it.

10-year outlook: The reporting and scheduling side of the job compresses hard, thinning administrative support layers, while the smaller tier that owns personnel, compliance findings, and program-level bets remains and gets busier.

Score — 49/100 resistance

Five dimensions, 0–20 each, summed. Higher means more protected. The arithmetic is shown so you can check it: 10 + 7 + 6 + 12 + 14 = 49.

Task resistance 10/20

Mixed — a routine tier and a judgment tier. Roughly half the week — enrollment dashboards, catalog and schedule updates, Title IV or Perkins compliance filings, accreditation self-study narratives assembled from data you already report elsewhere — is drafting and reconciliation that a model does in a first pass, while the other half (sitting with an instructor whose evaluations collapsed, walking an accreditor through a finding, telling a funder why cohort completion dropped) does not survive being handed to software, which is what puts this at 10 rather than the 5 a pure reporting role would get.

Embodiment 7/20

Some physical or field component. You are on campus — classroom observations, facility walk-throughs before a site visit, showing up in a correctional education wing or a hospital training unit where badge access and physical presence are the job — but none of it is skilled manual work, so the physical component is attendance and inspection rather than anything a machine would need hands to replicate.

Liability shield 6/20

Certification preferred, not legally required. Most positions in this bucket require a master's and administrative experience but no state-issued license that attaches personal liability the way a principal's or superintendent's certificate does; the institution's accreditation and its Clery/FERPA/Title IX exposure sit with the president or the general counsel, and a designated compliance officer's signature is institutional, not personal, which is why this lands at 6 rather than in licensed territory.

Trust premium 12/20

Some relationship component. Accreditors, agency program officers, employer partners in a corporate training contract, and the faculty you supervise deal with you by name over multi-year cycles, and a reviewer who trusts your self-study reads it differently — but the relationship is instrumental to getting programs approved and funded, not the deliverable itself, so it sits at 12 rather than at the 16-plus of a role where clients follow the individual out the door.

Judgment & accountability 14/20

Exists to be accountable for ambiguous calls. When an accreditor issues a finding, when a program's enrollment no longer supports its faculty line, when a student grievance against an instructor is credible but not provable, you make the call under incomplete facts and it becomes the institution's position — there is no procedure manual for cutting a program or non-renewing an instructor, and the consequences land on people's employment and students' credentials.

Confidence: medium · reviewed 2026-08-11 · how scoring works

Tasks already automatable

What survives

Active moats: judgment, trust

How to future-proof this job

Field report — do you do this job?

Has AI actually changed your work?

Self-reported and unverified — a sentiment signal, not a survey. One response per person per occupation; you can change your answer.

From people who do this job

Nobody has filed one yet. If you do this work, you know things the rubric can't see.

What has actually changed in your work?

Concrete beats general: a tool that arrived, a task that moved, a headcount decision you watched happen. Don't include anything that identifies you or your employer if that would put you at risk.