← Risk register SOC 11-9033 · reviewed 2026-08-11

Education Administrators, Postsecondary

180,470 US workers · median $104,590/yr · Management

EXPOSED

The modal worker here is a dean, registrar, admissions director, or student-affairs director, and a large slice of the day is document and data work AI now handles competently: drafting accreditation self-studies, summarizing enrollment and retention dashboards, screening applications, writing policy language, and generating catalog and scheduling text. What does not automate is the accountability layer — chairing a tenure or discipline case, negotiating budget cuts with faculty senate, handling a Title IX or crisis incident, and standing in front of parents, trustees, and regulators to own the call. No personal license is required, so the protection is institutional politics and human accountability rather than regulation, and administrative bloat is a standing budget target.

10-year outlook: Enrollment pressure plus AI-handled reporting will thin the mid-level administrative ranks noticeably by 2035, while roles that adjudicate people problems and defend the institution externally hold or grow.

US employment, 2019–2025+24.6%
144,880180,470 workers

Headcount grew steadily across the period.

Median pay $95,410 → $104,590 -12.3% in real terms (nominal +9.6%, less ~25% US inflation over the period)

The job count is not the verdict

This line is counted by the Bureau of Labor Statistics — the one figure on this page that isn't a judgement of ours. Headcount moves on demand, offshoring, demographics and the business cycle, and automation is one term among several, often not the loudest.

So a falling line is not evidence that AI did it, and a rising one is not evidence that it won't. Both happen in this register: some occupations resist automation and shrink anyway, others are highly automatable and keep growing. The marked year is 2020.

BLS projection, 2024–2034

+1.7%

Percentage only. The projection counts a different population from the 180,470 above — it includes self-employed workers, which for this occupation is most of them, so the two headcounts are not comparable.

Growing, and only partly exposed

The BLS expects +1.7% more of these jobs by 2034, and at 50/100 the work is only partly exposed — some tasks are automatable, the core of the job is not. Nothing here is in tension.

Different clocks. The score is what current AI could do to this work today. The projection is how many of these jobs will exist in 2034. Everything between the two — how fast employers actually adopt, whether demand grows in the meantime — is why they can point opposite ways without either being wrong.

~15,100 openings a year on average, including replacing people who leave.

One email if this score changes. Watch as many occupations as you like from the same address — no account, and nothing is sent on a schedule, only when a verdict actually moves.

Also known as — 24 job titles this covers

Titles reported by people doing this work, from the US Department of Labor's O*NET survey. If your job title is here, this page is about your work even though the name doesn't match.

DeanProvostRegistrarChancellorCommandantCampus DeanCollege DeanFaculty DeanStudent DeanAcademic DeanBusiness DeanEducation DeanAdmissions DeanCampus DirectorUniversity DeanInstruction DeanTesting DirectorCollege PresidentCollege RegistrarDivision DirectorResearch DirectorStudent Life DeanCampus CoordinatorEducation Director

Score — 50/100 resistance

Holding it up: judgment & accountability (15/20). Weakest point: liability shield (5/20).

Five dimensions, 0–20 each, summed. Higher means more protected. The arithmetic is shown so you can check it: 11 + 6 + 5 + 13 + 15 = 50. · Scored 2026-08-11, and re-examined when evidence accumulates rather than on a schedule.

Task resistance 11/20

Mixed — a routine tier and a judgment tier An 11 reflects the split inside a single week: the enrollment funnel reports, transfer-credit equivalency checks, catalog copy, degree-audit exception logs, and the first draft of an accreditation self-study narrative are all machine-drafted now, while the faculty senate negotiation, the tenure dossier meeting, and the 11pm call about a student in crisis are not — that is a genuine half-and-half, not a role whose core survives.

Embodiment 6/20

Some physical or field component A 6 covers the fact that most of the job runs from an office and a Zoom window, but commencement, orientation, campus tours, residence-hall walkthroughs after an incident, board retreats, and recruitment travel to high schools and college fairs put you physically in rooms where your presence is the point.

Liability shield 5/20

Certification preferred, not legally required A 5 rather than a 0 is because the role carries named institutional obligations — Clery Act reporting, Title IX coordinator or deputy designation, FERPA custodianship, SEVIS signatures for a DSO — and credentials like AACRAO or NASPA training are common, but none of that is a personal license a state board can revoke, so the institution absorbs the exposure and you can be replaced without a licensure gap.

Trust premium 13/20

The human relationship is the product A 13 sits at the floor of the top band because faculty compliance with a budget cut, a donor's gift, an accreditor's confidence in your self-study, and a parent's willingness to accept a suspension outcome all depend on knowing who you are — but those relationships attach substantially to the office and the institution's name, and successors inherit them, unlike a therapist's or an agent's book.

Judgment & accountability 15/20

Exists to be accountable for ambiguous calls A 15 is earned by calls with no procedure to hide behind: whether a Title IX finding warrants expulsion, whether to close campus during a threat, which program to eliminate and which faculty lines go with it, whether to grant a medical withdrawal that costs the institution tuition — and your name is on the memo when the trustees or a plaintiff's attorney reads it back.

Confidence: medium · reviewed 2026-08-11 · how scoring works

What this job involves — and which parts are yours

The verdict above describes this occupation as a whole. Almost nobody does the typical version of a job — tick what's actually in your week and see how your own mix sits.

AI already does these at usable quality

These still need a person

Active moats on the surviving side: judgment, trust

How to future-proof this job

Training paths for your skill gaps: Coursera — quality control and inspection courses, auditable free free to audit · MIT OpenCourseWare — operations management free · Toastmasters — public speaking practice at local clubs worldwide low · Learning How to Learn — the most-taken course on Coursera, and free free to audit · Khan Academy — physics, chemistry and biology from the ground up free · Khan Academy — reading and vocabulary, all levels, free free · Coursera — communication and interpersonal skills free to audit

All 35 skills ranked by how many jobs they open →

Where this experience transfers — occupations you could move toward

Computed from U.S. Dept. of Labor O*NET skill and knowledge profiles: high overlap with what you already do, a materially higher resistance score, no large jump in required training, and no licence you would have to start a new pipeline to get. Targets that pay meaningfully less, that are themselves COOKED, or whose own headcount is falling are excluded — a move into a shrinking trade is not an escape.

Education Administrators, Kindergarten through Secondary SAFE · 69/100 · you already have ~82% of the skill profile

Skills to close: Quality Control Analysis, Operations Analysis, Speaking, Learning Strategies

Clinical and Counseling Psychologists SAFE · 71/100 · you already have ~68% of the skill profile

Skills to close: Science, Reading Comprehension, Social Perceptiveness

What would move this back up — beyond any one person

The moves above are yours to make. This is the other half: what would have to change in the world for the occupation itself to score higher. None of it is in any one person's gift, but it is where the floor actually comes from. Scores here are not a one-way ratchet. Only two of the five dimensions — task resistance and embodiment — track what machines can do. The other three track law, what buyers will pay for, and who is answerable, and those move in both directions, often in response to the same pressure AI creates. If every lever below landed, this occupation would score around 62/100, still EXPOSED.

4 specific changes that would raise this score
  • already happening judgment accountability +3

    Post-2024 campus-protest and Title VI enforcement wave plus congressional testimony precedent has made discipline, speech, and safety calls career-ending and individually attributable; if state open-records or consent-decree settlements require the deciding administrator to be named in written findings, ownership of ambiguous calls hardens further.

  • already happening task resistance +3

    Genuine two-tier job: if AI absorbs the catalog, dashboard, scheduling, and self-study drafting tier, the surviving role is hearing-chairing, faculty-senate and union negotiation, and crisis command — but note this shrinks headcount rather than protecting it, and shows up as fewer positions with higher scores.

  • plausible liability shield +4

    Federal or state rules naming a specific institutional officer as personally accountable for compliance determinations — e.g. the Clery Act 'Campus Safety Survey Administrator' and Title IX Coordinator roles being extended by ED rulemaking or state law to require a named, signed human certification that AI-generated findings were independently reviewed; similarly a designated certifying officer for Title IV/FAFSA and SEVIS/DSO attestations (DSO signature already legally personal for I-20s). Accreditor standards (SACSCOC, WSCUC) requiring a named officer to attest self-studies were not machine-generated would push the same way.

  • plausible trust premium +2

    Narrow route only: enrollment-management and admissions where families and boards demand a human read of holistic files — visible in institutions publicly pledging no AI-only admissions decisions and in state bills (e.g. proposals restricting automated decision systems in education) requiring human review of adverse decisions.

The limit. No personal license exists or is likely for deans and registrars, so liability_shield is capped around 9-10 via role-designation rules rather than licensure. Budget pressure works the other direction: administrative headcount is the standing cut target, so scores can rise while jobs disappear.

These are conditions, not forecasts — what would have to happen, not what will. Specific rules, cases and bills are named so you can go and check whether they exist and where they stand; verify before relying on any of them. Nothing here is legal or financial advice.

Where this work is, and what it pays there

BLS metro figures for 228 areas. The verdict above does not change by city — the rubric judges what the work involves, not where it happens — but pay and headcount do, and the national median hides a very wide range.

Most of these jobs

New York-Newark-Jersey City, NY-NJ 7,550 $137,800 +32%
Boston-Cambridge-Newton, MA-NH 6,770 $131,130 +25%
Chicago-Naperville-Elgin, IL-IN 6,270 $101,070 -3%
Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim, CA 6,050 $125,230 +20%
Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington, PA-NJ-DE-MD 4,330 $117,980 +13%
Washington-Arlington-Alexandria, DC-VA-MD-WV 4,200 $125,460 +20%
Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington, TX 3,390 $102,990 -2%
Austin-Round Rock-San Marcos, TX 3,270 $125,190 +20%

Best paid

Augusta-Richmond County, GA-SC 190 $177,150 +69%
Santa Cruz-Watsonville, CA 50 $172,410 +65%
Binghamton, NY 60 $166,660 +59%

Percentages are against this occupation's national median of $104,590. Counts are jobs in that metro, not vacancies. Metros where the BLS suppressed the cell are absent rather than shown as zero.

Who is actually doing this

The score above is about what the work exposes. This is reporting about real deployments in this occupation — the difference between "could be automated" and "somebody automated it."

University of Washington

1 of 1 reported case, with sources

Quick take — do you do this job?

Has AI actually changed your work? One tap, anonymous, and the running tally is public. Nothing else is asked of you.

Self-reported and unverified — a sentiment signal, not a survey. One response per person per occupation; you can change your answer.

Field reports — what people say has changed

No field reports yet. A written account takes a paragraph rather than a tap, goes to an editor before it appears, and is the one thing on this page the rubric cannot produce on its own.

File a field report

Concrete beats general: a tool that arrived, a task that moved, a headcount decision you watched happen. Don't include anything that identifies you or your employer if that would put you at risk.

Watch this verdict
Kept current

Rather than check back: get the digest and we'll tell you what changed — or watch a single occupation from its own page.