← Risk register SOC 29-1215 · reviewed 2026-08-11

Family Medicine Physicians

107,510 US workers · median $244,180/yr · Healthcare

SAFE

The documentation half of family medicine — visit notes, prior-auth letters, referral summaries, coding, patient-portal message drafts, guideline lookup — is already being absorbed by ambient scribes and clinical decision support, and that is real relief rather than real displacement. What remains is the part that pays: laying hands on a patient, examining an ear or an abdomen, doing skin biopsies and joint injections, deciding which of six vague complaints in a 15-minute slot is the dangerous one, and signing the prescription under a license you personally answer for. Longitudinal relationships with families over decades are the product, not a wrapper around it.

10-year outlook: By 2035 the paperwork burden shrinks sharply and AI handles much of the low-acuity triage, but demand for licensed family physicians who examine, prescribe, and take responsibility outstrips supply.

US employment, 2019–2025-1.7%
109,370107,510 workers

Roughly flat across the period, with year-to-year wobble.

Median pay $205,590 → $244,180 -5.0% in real terms (nominal +18.8%, less ~25% US inflation over the period)

The job count is not the verdict

This line is counted by the Bureau of Labor Statistics — the one figure on this page that isn't a judgement of ours. Headcount moves on demand, offshoring, demographics and the business cycle, and automation is one term among several, often not the loudest.

So a falling line is not evidence that AI did it, and a rising one is not evidence that it won't. Both happen in this register: some occupations resist automation and shrink anyway, others are highly automatable and keep growing. The marked year is 2020.

BLS projection, 2024–2034

+2.7% 116,000 → 119,100 on the projections basis

Hard to automate, and growing

The work resists current AI and the BLS projects +2.7% more of these jobs by 2034. Note that safe does not mean well paid — several of the fastest-growing resistant occupations are among the lowest paid on the register.

Different clocks. The score is what current AI could do to this work today. The projection is how many of these jobs will exist in 2034. Everything between the two — how fast employers actually adopt, whether demand grows in the meantime — is why they can point opposite ways without either being wrong.

~3,300 openings a year on average, including replacing people who leave.

One email if this score changes. Watch as many occupations as you like from the same address — no account, and nothing is sent on a schedule, only when a verdict actually moves.

Also known as — 23 job titles this covers

Titles reported by people doing this work, from the US Department of Labor's O*NET survey. If your job title is here, this page is about your work even though the name doesn't match.

DoctorPhysicianGeriatricianFamily PhysicianGeneral PhysicianFamily PractitionerGeriatric PhysicianMedical Doctor (MD)General PractitionerOccupational PhysicianPrimary Care PhysicianMedical Staff PhysicianPublic Health PhysicianFamily Medicine PhysicianFamily Practice PractitionerBoard Certified Family PhysicianGeneral Practice Doctor (GP Doctor)Outpatient Family Medicine PhysicianFamily Practice Medical Doctor (FP MD)Family Practice Physician (FP Physician)Family Practice Physician Traditional PractitionerDO Physician (Doctor of Osteopathic Medicine Physician)Family Medicine PCP (Family Medicine Primary Care Physician)

Score — 84/100 resistance

Holding it up: liability shield (20/20). Weakest point: task resistance (13/20).

Five dimensions, 0–20 each, summed. Higher means more protected. The arithmetic is shown so you can check it: 13 + 15 + 20 + 18 + 18 = 84. · Scored 2026-08-11, and re-examined when evidence accumulates rather than on a schedule.

Task resistance 13/20

Mixed — a routine tier and a judgment tier Differential diagnosis from an undifferentiated complaint — the 15-minute slot that opens with 'I'm just tired' and has to end with a decision about whether this is anemia, depression, or occult malignancy — resists automation, but a genuinely large share of the workday is chart review, refill authorization, guideline-driven screening intervals, USPSTF-conformant health maintenance, and inbox triage that algorithms handle competently, which is what puts this at 13 rather than 17.

Embodiment 15/20

Hands-on in uncontrolled environments Otoscopy, abdominal palpation, pelvic and prostate exams, punch biopsies, cryotherapy, IUD insertion, joint injections and casting all require a physician's hands on a body in an exam room, but this is a controlled clinical environment with staff, equipment, and no roof to climb — hence 15 rather than the 19 of a wildland paramedic.

Liability shield 20/20

Licensed human required and personally liable State medical licensure, DEA registration for controlled substances, and board certification are hard legal gates; the prescription and the note carry your NPI, malpractice exposure attaches personally under state standard-of-care law, and no software can be the physician of record — this is the definitional 20.

Trust premium 18/20

The human relationship is the product Continuity is the clinical instrument: knowing that this patient's blood pressure is only high in your office, that this family does not vaccinate and why, that a stoic 60-year-old farmer describing 'indigestion' means something serious — panel loyalty over decades is why patients follow you when you change practices, and only the fact that urgent-care and locum family medicine is genuinely transactional keeps it off 20.

Judgment & accountability 18/20

Exists to be accountable for ambiguous calls You decide alone whether chest pain goes to the ED or home with a follow-up, whether to taper a long-term opioid patient, whether a child's fever justifies a lumbar puncture, and whether to file a mandated abuse report — high-stakes calls made on incomplete data with no specialist in the room, though referral to cardiology or surgery does distribute the hardest decisions, which is why 18 not 20.

Confidence: high · reviewed 2026-08-11 · how scoring works

What this job involves — and which parts are yours

The verdict above describes this occupation as a whole. Almost nobody does the typical version of a job — tick what's actually in your week and see how your own mix sits.

AI already does these at usable quality

These still need a person

Active moats on the surviving side: embodiment, licensure, trust, judgment

How to future-proof this job

Where to go deeper on what this job runs on: Coursera — critical thinking and logic, audit free free to audit · Khan Academy — reading and vocabulary, all levels, free free · Coursera — active listening and communication skills free to audit · Purdue OWL — the standard reference for professional writing free · Toastmasters — public speaking practice at local clubs worldwide low · MIT OpenCourseWare — full course materials across every department, free free

All 35 skills ranked by how many jobs they open →

What would move this back up — beyond any one person

The moves above are yours to make. This is the other half: what would have to change in the world for the occupation itself to score higher. None of it is in any one person's gift, but it is where the floor actually comes from. Scores here are not a one-way ratchet. Only two of the five dimensions — task resistance and embodiment — track what machines can do. The other three track law, what buyers will pay for, and who is answerable, and those move in both directions, often in response to the same pressure AI creates. If every lever below landed, this occupation would score around 91/100, still SAFE.

3 specific changes that would raise this score
  • already happening task resistance +3

    Task-mix shift: as ambient scribes (Abridge, Nuance DAX) and inbox drafting absorb documentation and portal replies, the residual day concentrates into physical exam, in-office procedures (skin biopsy, joint injection, IUD placement, laceration repair), and undifferentiated-complaint triage — the tiers AI cannot close. Watch for procedure-heavy visit mix and panel size rising per physician without note-writing time.

  • already happening trust premium +2

    Continued growth of direct primary care and concierge memberships (Atlas MD-style, ~$70-100/month) where the explicit product is a named physician's continuity — patients paying cash outside insurance for human relationship is the cleanest possible demonstration of a human-specific premium. Also watch payer recognition of longitudinal-relationship codes (G2211 add-on, live since 2024) which pays specifically for continuity.

  • plausible judgment accountability +2

    If scope rules or malpractice carriers formalize the family physician as the accountable supervisor of AI-triaged and NP/PA-delivered panels — i.e. signing off on decisions made by others and by software across a larger panel — the role becomes almost purely consequential-call ownership. Watch state collaborative-practice agreements and carrier underwriting questions about AI supervision.

The limit. Already at 84 with liability_shield maxed; realistic headroom is a few points from task-mix concentration and continuity pricing. The real risk to this score is not AI but scope-of-practice expansion for NPs/PAs paired with AI decision support, which erodes the liability shield's exclusivity from the human side, not the machine side.

These are conditions, not forecasts — what would have to happen, not what will. Specific rules, cases and bills are named so you can go and check whether they exist and where they stand; verify before relying on any of them. Nothing here is legal or financial advice.

Where this work is, and what it pays there

BLS metro figures for 253 areas. The verdict above does not change by city — the rubric judges what the work involves, not where it happens — but pay and headcount do, and the national median hides a very wide range.

Most of these jobs

New York-Newark-Jersey City, NY-NJ 4,870 $249,150 +2%
Boston-Cambridge-Newton, MA-NH 2,950 $284,010 +16%
Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington, TX 2,240 $259,310 +6%
San Francisco-Oakland-Fremont, CA 2,170 $304,560 +25%
Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Roswell, GA 2,060 $259,320 +6%
Phoenix-Mesa-Chandler, AZ 2,050 $341,680 +40%
Detroit-Warren-Dearborn, MI 1,940 $181,990 -25%
Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington, PA-NJ-DE-MD 1,790 $294,430 +21%

Best paid

Oklahoma City, OK 940 $481,870 +97%
Knoxville, TN 590 $460,080 +88%
Great Falls, MT 30 $449,840 +84%

Percentages are against this occupation's national median of $244,180. Counts are jobs in that metro, not vacancies. Metros where the BLS suppressed the cell are absent rather than shown as zero.

Who is actually doing this

The score above is about what the work exposes. This is reporting about real deployments in this occupation — the difference between "could be automated" and "somebody automated it."

1 of 1 reported case, with sources

Quick take — do you do this job?

Has AI actually changed your work? One tap, anonymous, and the running tally is public. Nothing else is asked of you.

Self-reported and unverified — a sentiment signal, not a survey. One response per person per occupation; you can change your answer.

Field reports — what people say has changed

No field reports yet. A written account takes a paragraph rather than a tap, goes to an editor before it appears, and is the one thing on this page the rubric cannot produce on its own.

File a field report

Concrete beats general: a tool that arrived, a task that moved, a headcount decision you watched happen. Don't include anything that identifies you or your employer if that would put you at risk.

Watch this verdict
Kept current

Rather than check back: get the digest and we'll tell you what changed — or watch a single occupation from its own page.