← Risk register SOC 43-3099 · reviewed 2026-08-11

Financial Clerks, All Other

36,260 US workers · median $53,830/yr · Office

COOKED

This residual clerk category is built out of exactly the work software eats first: keying transactions into financial systems, reconciling account records against statements, checking documents for completeness, chasing missing paperwork, and generating routine reports. There is no licensure, no signature liability, and the modal worker executes defined procedures on defined inputs rather than making judgment calls. The small surviving slice is exception handling — the odd transaction that doesn't reconcile, the customer or vendor who needs a phone call, the audit request that requires digging through history.

10-year outlook: Employment in this catch-all clerical category will keep contracting as ERP automation, bank feeds, and document-reading AI absorb the keying and reconciliation work; the residual jobs will be fewer, broader, and centered on exceptions, audits, and system administration.

US employment, 2019–2025+18.9%
30,50036,260 workers

Headcount grew steadily across the period.

Median pay $42,420 → $53,830 +1.5% in real terms (nominal +26.9%, less ~25% US inflation over the period)

The job count is not the verdict

This line is counted by the Bureau of Labor Statistics — the one figure on this page that isn't a judgement of ours. Headcount moves on demand, offshoring, demographics and the business cycle, and automation is one term among several, often not the loudest.

So a falling line is not evidence that AI did it, and a rising one is not evidence that it won't. Both happen in this register: some occupations resist automation and shrink anyway, others are highly automatable and keep growing. The marked year is 2020.

BLS projection, 2024–2034

+1.4% 38,900 → 39,400 on the projections basis

Exposed, but growing

AI can already do a lot of these tasks, and the BLS still expects +1.4% more of these jobs by 2034. Demand for the output is growing faster than the work is being automated away — the mechanism BLS gives for software developers, and the combination people most often misread as an error.

Different clocks. The score is what current AI could do to this work today. The projection is how many of these jobs will exist in 2034. Everything between the two — how fast employers actually adopt, whether demand grows in the meantime — is why they can point opposite ways without either being wrong.

~4,000 openings a year on average, including replacing people who leave.

One email if this score changes. Watch as many occupations as you like from the same address — no account, and nothing is sent on a schedule, only when a verdict actually moves.

Also known as — 8 job titles this covers

Titles reported by people doing this work, from the US Department of Labor's O*NET survey. If your job title is here, this page is about your work even though the name doesn't match.

Vault TellerBank Vault ClerkSafe Deposit ClerkBank Vault AttendantBank Vault CustodianSafety Deposit ClerkFinancial Reserve ClerkFinancial Operations Clerk

This is a catch-all code, not a single job

The BLS uses Financial Clerks, All Other for work that doesn't fit any named occupation, so it covers roles that have little in common with each other. Two consequences worth knowing before you read anything below:

If a more specific occupation on the register describes what you actually do, that page is the one to trust.

Score — 17/100 resistance

Holding it up: task resistance (5/20). Weakest point: liability shield (1/20).

Five dimensions, 0–20 each, summed. Higher means more protected. The arithmetic is shown so you can check it: 5 + 3 + 1 + 4 + 4 = 17. · Scored 2026-08-11, and re-examined when evidence accumulates rather than on a schedule.

Task resistance 5/20

Core tasks are already automatable Matching remittance advice to open invoices, keying batch deposits, flagging accounts that don't tie, and pulling a standing weekly report are all structured-input/structured-output tasks that ERP modules and RPA scripts already do end-to-end — the 5 rather than a 0 reflects the residual chasing of a vendor whose paperwork never arrived and the unreconciled item nobody documented.

Embodiment 3/20

Fully desk- and screen-based The physical component is walking to a printer, opening mail, pulling a folder from a file room, or scanning a stack for imaging — real but incidental, which is why it sits at 3 and not at 0.

Liability shield 1/20

No licence, no signature requirement No state licence, no bonding requirement, no CPA-style attestation: your reconciliation is reviewed and signed off by an accountant or controller, and the 1 exists only because some employers require a bond or background check for cash-handling roles.

Trust premium 4/20

Anonymous artifact production You have named counterparties — the AP contact at a recurring vendor, the branch that calls when a wire posts wrong — but the work product is a correct ledger entry that nobody attributes to you, so the relationship smooths the job rather than being the job.

Judgment & accountability 4/20

Executes defined procedures on defined inputs Discretion runs to deciding whether a $12 variance is worth escalating or whether a document is complete enough to process; the dollar thresholds, approval routes, and escalation rules come from a controller's written policy, which is why this is 4 and not the 8-plus you'd give someone setting those thresholds.

Confidence: medium · reviewed 2026-08-11 · how scoring works

What this job involves — and which parts are yours

The verdict above describes this occupation as a whole. Almost nobody does the typical version of a job — tick what's actually in your week and see how your own mix sits.

AI already does these at usable quality

These still need a person

How to future-proof this job

All 35 skills ranked by how many jobs they open →

What would move this back up — beyond any one person

The moves above are yours to make. This is the other half: what would have to change in the world for the occupation itself to score higher. None of it is in any one person's gift, but it is where the floor actually comes from. Scores here are not a one-way ratchet. Only two of the five dimensions — task resistance and embodiment — track what machines can do. The other three track law, what buyers will pay for, and who is answerable, and those move in both directions, often in response to the same pressure AI creates. If every lever below landed, this occupation would score around 33/100, still COOKED.

5 specific changes that would raise this score
  • already happening task resistance +4

    Task-mix shift: as RPA/AI absorbs keying, matching and report generation, the residual role collapses onto exception handling — unreconciled items, vendor disputes, audit trail reconstruction, and 'the system says X but the document says Y' cases. This is a genuine two-tier job and the surviving tier is the judgment tier; the count shrinks but the remaining job scores higher.

  • already happening liability shield +3

    BSA/AML sector specifically: FinCEN and FFIEC guidance already expects a human disposition decision on automated transaction-monitoring alerts, with the SAR filed under an accountable institution officer. If clerks in bank back offices are formally designated alert-dispositioning staff under the AML program, personal regulatory exposure attaches.

  • plausible liability shield +4

    Sarbanes-Oxley 404 / PCAOB AS 2201 pressure on ICFR for AI-generated journal entries: if external auditors and audit committees require a named human preparer-reviewer signoff on machine-proposed entries and reconciliations (segregation-of-duties and management-review-control evidence that an AI cannot satisfy), the reconciliation clerk becomes the documented control owner. Watch PCAOB inspection findings on automated controls and SEC comment letters on AI in the close process.

  • plausible judgment accountability +3

    Escalation authority formalized: if the residual role owns the write-off threshold, the decision to release a held payment, or whether an unmatched item is fraud versus error — with a dollar authority limit in the delegation-of-authority matrix — the role owns consequential calls rather than routing them.

  • plausible trust premium +2

    Narrow route only: counterparty-facing collections and vendor dispute work where the other party is a person who will not resolve with a bot. Not a general premium — buyers do not pay extra for human data entry, and no plausible mechanism makes them.

The limit. Even with every lever, this stays a low-scoring occupation. The levers raise the score of the surviving role, not the headcount — an exception-handling tier that is 15% the size of today's clerk pool scoring 35 is still 85% displacement. There is no licensure body for financial clerks and no realistic path to creating one.

These are conditions, not forecasts — what would have to happen, not what will. Specific rules, cases and bills are named so you can go and check whether they exist and where they stand; verify before relying on any of them. Nothing here is legal or financial advice.

Where this work is, and what it pays there

BLS metro figures for 95 areas. The verdict above does not change by city — the rubric judges what the work involves, not where it happens — but pay and headcount do, and the national median hides a very wide range.

Most of these jobs

Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington, TX 2,740 $54,080 +0%
New York-Newark-Jersey City, NY-NJ 2,710 $62,140 +15%
Chicago-Naperville-Elgin, IL-IN 1,820 $56,980 +6%
Denver-Aurora-Centennial, CO 1,340 $61,090 +13%
Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington, PA-NJ-DE-MD 1,020 $58,010 +8%
Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim, CA 920 $60,780 +13%
Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Roswell, GA 800 $56,130 +4%
Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands, TX 600 $54,680 +2%

Best paid

Washington-Arlington-Alexandria, DC-VA-MD-WV 300 $73,030 +36%
San Francisco-Oakland-Fremont, CA 330 $71,060 +32%
Trenton-Princeton, NJ 140 $64,740 +20%

Percentages are against this occupation's national median of $53,830. Counts are jobs in that metro, not vacancies. Metros where the BLS suppressed the cell are absent rather than shown as zero.

Who is actually doing this

The score above is about what the work exposes. This is reporting about real deployments in this occupation — the difference between "could be automated" and "somebody automated it."

Ibex 35 banks · MVB Bank

2 of 2 reported cases, with sources

Quick take — do you do this job?

Has AI actually changed your work? One tap, anonymous, and the running tally is public. Nothing else is asked of you.

Self-reported and unverified — a sentiment signal, not a survey. One response per person per occupation; you can change your answer.

Field reports — what people say has changed

No field reports yet. A written account takes a paragraph rather than a tap, goes to an editor before it appears, and is the one thing on this page the rubric cannot produce on its own.

File a field report

Concrete beats general: a tool that arrived, a task that moved, a headcount decision you watched happen. Don't include anything that identifies you or your employer if that would put you at risk.

Watch this verdict
Kept current

Rather than check back: get the digest and we'll tell you what changed — or watch a single occupation from its own page.