← Risk register SOC 41-3021 · reviewed 2026-08-11

Insurance Sales Agents

479,100 US workers · median $62,280/yr · Sales

EXPOSED

Most of the day — quoting, comparing carriers, filling applications, chasing renewals, answering coverage questions — is text and form work that comparison engines and direct-to-consumer carriers already do without an agent, and personal auto/home lines have been eroding for two decades. What holds is the state producer license, the E&O-backed recommendation on complex risk, and the fact that people buying life, disability, or a commercial package for a $4M business want a named human who picks up the phone at claim time. Scoring the modal agent (heavily personal-lines and captive); commercial and employee-benefits producers sit meaningfully safer than this number.

10-year outlook: Personal-lines commission volume keeps draining to direct and embedded channels, headcount thins, and the agents left are commercial, benefits, and complex-life specialists carrying larger books.

US employment, 2019–2025+16.8%
410,050479,100 workers

Headcount grew steadily across the period.

Median pay $50,940 → $62,280 -2.2% in real terms (nominal +22.3%, less ~25% US inflation over the period)

The job count is not the verdict

This line is counted by the Bureau of Labor Statistics — the one figure on this page that isn't a judgement of ours. Headcount moves on demand, offshoring, demographics and the business cycle, and automation is one term among several, often not the loudest.

So a falling line is not evidence that AI did it, and a rising one is not evidence that it won't. Both happen in this register: some occupations resist automation and shrink anyway, others are highly automatable and keep growing. The marked year is 2020.

BLS projection, 2024–2034

+3.7%

Percentage only. The projection counts a different population from the 479,100 above — it includes self-employed workers, which for this occupation is most of them, so the two headcounts are not comparable.

Exposed, but growing

AI can already do a lot of these tasks, and the BLS still expects +3.7% more of these jobs by 2034. Demand for the output is growing faster than the work is being automated away — the mechanism BLS gives for software developers, and the combination people most often misread as an error.

Different clocks. The score is what current AI could do to this work today. The projection is how many of these jobs will exist in 2034. Everything between the two — how fast employers actually adopt, whether demand grows in the meantime — is why they can point opposite ways without either being wrong.

~47,000 openings a year on average, including replacing people who leave.

One email if this score changes. Watch as many occupations as you like from the same address — no account, and nothing is sent on a schedule, only when a verdict actually moves.

Also known as — 24 job titles this covers

Titles reported by people doing this work, from the US Department of Labor's O*NET survey. If your job title is here, this page is about your work even though the name doesn't match.

SolicitorBond WriterDebit AgentSales AgentBurial AgentPension AgentDistrict AgentEstate PlannerInsurance AgentSales AssociateInsurance BrokerSales SpecialistAccount SpecialistCompensation AgentInsurance ProducerInsurance SalesmanNetwork ContractorInsurance SolicitorSales Special AgentField RepresentativeInsurance SpecialistLife Insurance AgentSales RepresentativeEnrollment Specialist

Score — 45/100 resistance

Holding it up: trust premium (13/20). Weakest point: embodiment (5/20).

Five dimensions, 0–20 each, summed. Higher means more protected. The arithmetic is shown so you can check it: 7 + 5 + 11 + 13 + 9 = 45. · Scored 2026-08-11, and re-examined when evidence accumulates rather than on a schedule.

Task resistance 7/20

Mixed — a routine tier and a judgment tier Rating quotes, running an ACORD 125, comparing three carriers' declarations pages, and re-soliciting a 6-month renewal are all structured data entry that Progressive's and Lemonade's own funnels complete unattended — the 7 rather than 4 reflects the discovery conversation that surfaces the teenage driver, the home office, the boat, and the umbrella gap a form never asks about.

Embodiment 5/20

Some physical or field component A 5 covers the physical minority of the job: property walk-throughs and photos on a homeowners inspection, driving to a small-business owner's shop to write the BOP, and the community-lunch prospecting that still generates referrals — everything else happens from a desk on an AMS and a phone.

Liability shield 11/20

Licensed human required and personally liable An 11 sits at the floor of the licensed band because the state producer license, appointment, CE hours, and E&O policy are real and revocable, but the carrier underwrites and issues, so a denied claim usually lands on the policy language rather than on you unless you failed to offer or document a coverage.

Trust premium 13/20

The human relationship is the product At 13 the relationship is genuinely the product for life, disability, and commercial book-of-business clients who call your cell after a fire and renew for fifteen years — it is not higher because a large share of personal-lines premium moves on price at renewal regardless of who wrote it.

Judgment & accountability 9/20

Meaningful discretion A 9 reflects discretion within carrier appetite guides and underwriting rules: you choose liability limits, deductibles, endorsements, and whether to place a risk in the standard or E&S market, but you do not set rates, approve binds, or adjudicate the claim.

Confidence: high · reviewed 2026-08-11 · how scoring works

What this job involves — and which parts are yours

The verdict above describes this occupation as a whole. Almost nobody does the typical version of a job — tick what's actually in your week and see how your own mix sits.

AI already does these at usable quality

These still need a person

Active moats on the surviving side: licensure, trust, judgment

How to future-proof this job

Training paths for your skill gaps: Coursera — quality control and inspection courses, auditable free free to audit · MIT OpenCourseWare — finance and accounting free · edX — supply chain and inventory management free to audit · MIT OpenCourseWare — full course materials across every department, free free

All 35 skills ranked by how many jobs they open →

Where this experience transfers — occupations you could move toward

Computed from U.S. Dept. of Labor O*NET skill and knowledge profiles: high overlap with what you already do, a materially higher resistance score, no large jump in required training, and no licence you would have to start a new pipeline to get. Targets that pay meaningfully less, that are themselves COOKED, or whose own headcount is falling are excluded — a move into a shrinking trade is not an escape.

Real Estate Brokers EXPOSED · 62/100 · you already have ~66% of the skill profile

Skills to close: Quality Control Analysis, Management of Financial Resources, Management of Material Resources, Active Learning

What would move this back up — beyond any one person

The moves above are yours to make. This is the other half: what would have to change in the world for the occupation itself to score higher. None of it is in any one person's gift, but it is where the floor actually comes from. Scores here are not a one-way ratchet. Only two of the five dimensions — task resistance and embodiment — track what machines can do. The other three track law, what buyers will pay for, and who is answerable, and those move in both directions, often in response to the same pressure AI creates. If every lever below landed, this occupation would score around 61/100, still EXPOSED.

5 specific changes that would raise this score
  • already happening liability shield +4

    State adoption/enforcement of the NAIC Suitability in Annuity Transactions Model Reg (best-interest standard, now in ~48 states) plus NAIC's AI Model Bulletin extended to producer-facing tools, requiring a named licensed producer to attest to and personally own suitability documentation for any AI-generated recommendation in life/annuity/LTC — making the signature non-delegable to a carrier's engine

  • already happening task resistance +4

    Task-mix shift: personal auto/home quoting fully absorbed by carrier direct channels and embedded distribution, leaving the surviving book as commercial package, benefits, and complex life — risk-capture interviews, loss-run interpretation, coverage-gap arguments with underwriters. This raises the score only for the remaining agents, and shrinks headcount while doing it

  • already happening judgment accountability +3

    Growth of the agent-as-claim-advocate role: when a denial lands, the producer who bound the policy is the person who fights the adjuster and eats the E&O exposure if a coverage gap was missed. Hard-market conditions in property (FL, CA, TX admitted-market withdrawals) and E&S placement push more decisions onto the producer's judgment about carrier solvency and non-admitted forms

  • plausible liability shield +3

    A DOL fiduciary-style rule or state equivalent extending best-interest duty to rollover and life-insurance-as-investment sales, with E&O carriers (Utica, Swiss Re producer programs) writing exclusions for recommendations issued without a licensed producer's documented review

  • plausible trust premium +2

    Commercial and benefits buyers formalizing willingness to pay for a named human — RFPs from mid-market employers specifying a dedicated licensed service team, and fee-based (not commission) advisory arrangements for benefits consulting under CAA 2021 broker compensation disclosure

The limit. Personal-lines captive agents have essentially no route up: the liability shield sits with the carrier, the product is commoditized, and no buyer pays extra for a human to sell them a $1,400 auto policy. The levers above mostly describe commercial/benefits producers, who are a different job wearing the same SOC code.

These are conditions, not forecasts — what would have to happen, not what will. Specific rules, cases and bills are named so you can go and check whether they exist and where they stand; verify before relying on any of them. Nothing here is legal or financial advice.

Where this work is, and what it pays there

BLS metro figures for 387 areas. The verdict above does not change by city — the rubric judges what the work involves, not where it happens — but pay and headcount do, and the national median hides a very wide range.

Most of these jobs

New York-Newark-Jersey City, NY-NJ 21,280 $80,620 +29%
Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington, TX 15,800 $59,510 -4%
Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim, CA 14,680 $76,870 +23%
Miami-Fort Lauderdale-West Palm Beach, FL 14,160 $60,260 -3%
Chicago-Naperville-Elgin, IL-IN 11,870 $69,240 +11%
Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Roswell, GA 9,660 $75,990 +22%
Phoenix-Mesa-Chandler, AZ 9,020 $61,570 -1%
Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL 8,750 $60,820 -2%

Best paid

San Francisco-Oakland-Fremont, CA 4,860 $95,640 +54%
Fond du Lac, WI 120 $95,110 +53%
Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington, MN-WI 6,750 $84,670 +36%

Percentages are against this occupation's national median of $62,280. Counts are jobs in that metro, not vacancies. Metros where the BLS suppressed the cell are absent rather than shown as zero.

Who is actually doing this

The score above is about what the work exposes. This is reporting about real deployments in this occupation — the difference between "could be automated" and "somebody automated it."

Hanwha Life

1 of 1 reported case, with sources

Quick take — do you do this job?

Has AI actually changed your work? One tap, anonymous, and the running tally is public. Nothing else is asked of you.

Self-reported and unverified — a sentiment signal, not a survey. One response per person per occupation; you can change your answer.

Field reports — what people say has changed

No field reports yet. A written account takes a paragraph rather than a tap, goes to an editor before it appears, and is the one thing on this page the rubric cannot produce on its own.

File a field report

Concrete beats general: a tool that arrived, a task that moved, a headcount decision you watched happen. Don't include anything that identifies you or your employer if that would put you at risk.

Watch this verdict
Kept current

Rather than check back: get the digest and we'll tell you what changed — or watch a single occupation from its own page.