← Risk register SOC 17-1012 · reviewed 2026-08-11

Landscape Architects

19,600 US workers · median $79,870/yr · Engineering

EXPOSED

The production core of this job — CAD site plans, planting schedules, grading and drainage layouts, rendering, spec writing, zoning and code research — is exactly the text-and-screen work generative design tools are eating fastest, and junior drafting hours are the first to go. What holds is licensure: most states require a licensed landscape architect to seal construction documents, and that seal carries personal liability for stormwater, ADA circulation, and slope stability failures. Site walks, construction observation, contractor coordination, and public-meeting advocacy in front of hostile neighbors are also not automating; the modal worker survives by moving up into that tier rather than out of the profession.

10-year outlook: Firms will produce the same volume of plans with fewer drafting hours, so employment stays flat or dips while the licensed, stamp-and-site-visit tier keeps its billing power.

Score — 53/100 resistance

Five dimensions, 0–20 each, summed. Higher means more protected. The arithmetic is shown so you can check it: 9 + 9 + 13 + 10 + 12 = 53.

Task resistance 9/20

Mixed — a routine tier and a judgment tier. Generative layout tools already produce credible planting palettes, grading iterations, and stormwater volume checks from a site survey, and the hours you actually bill — CAD sheet sets, plant schedules, irrigation details, LEED/SITES documentation, municipal code cross-checks — are the most tokenizable parts of the practice, which is why this sits at 9 rather than mid-teens: what resists is not the drawing but the walking, the punch list, and the planning-commission hearing.

Embodiment 9/20

Some physical or field component. You are on site for topographic verification, soil percolation checks, tree protection zones, and construction observation walks where the contractor set the swale two feet off — real boots-in-mud work, but it is intermittent visits to a site someone else is building, not the daily uncontrolled-environment exposure of the crews you inspect, which is what separates a 9 from a 15.

Liability shield 13/20

Licensed human required and personally liable. Roughly 49 states license landscape architects under practice or title acts, and your seal on grading and drainage sheets makes you personally answerable when a retention basin fails or an accessible route exceeds 5% running slope — the 13 rather than 18 reflects that much of the profession's work (master planning, design concepts, planting design) is legally sealable by architects and civil engineers too, so the statutory monopoly is narrower than a PE's or surveyor's.

Trust premium 10/20

Some relationship component. Repeat institutional clients — a university facilities office, a municipal parks department, a developer who liked how you handled the last neighborhood meeting — hire you by name and reputation, but the deliverable is a stamped set of documents that a successor firm could produce, and most public work still comes through RFQ scoring rather than relationship, which puts this at 10 and not 15.

Judgment & accountability 12/20

Meaningful discretion. You make calls no code answers: whether a mature oak can survive the proposed cut, how much slope to accept before it becomes a maintenance liability, which stormwater approach will actually pass the reviewing engineer — genuine discretion with consequences years out, held at 12 because the governing constraints (zoning setbacks, ADA, local stormwater ordinances, plant hardiness) are written down and reviewed by others before anything is built.

Confidence: medium · reviewed 2026-08-11 · how scoring works

Tasks already automatable

What survives

Active moats: licensure, liability, judgment

How to future-proof this job

Training paths for your skill gaps: Systems analysis & design partner link

Escape hatches — adjacent fields with better verdicts

Computed from U.S. Dept. of Labor O*NET skill profiles: high overlap with what you already do, materially higher resistance score.

Chief Executives SAFE · 69/100 · you already have ~72% of the skill profile

Skills to close: Systems Evaluation, Systems Analysis, Persuasion, Monitoring

Field report — do you do this job?

Has AI actually changed your work?

Self-reported and unverified — a sentiment signal, not a survey. One response per person per occupation; you can change your answer.

From people who do this job

Nobody has filed one yet. If you do this work, you know things the rubric can't see.

What has actually changed in your work?

Concrete beats general: a tool that arrived, a task that moved, a headcount decision you watched happen. Don't include anything that identifies you or your employer if that would put you at risk.