← Risk register SOC 49-9011 · reviewed 2026-08-11

Mechanical Door Repairers

27,120 US workers · median $55,720/yr · Trades

SAFE

The work is diagnosing and fixing overhead, automatic, and revolving doors in situ — replacing torsion springs, aligning tracks, adjusting sensors and closers, rewiring operators, and cutting and hanging hardware in buildings that are never built the same way twice. None of that is text or screen work, and today's robotics cannot get a 200-pound sectional door off a bent track in a cramped commercial vestibule. AI compresses the paperwork around the job — quoting, scheduling, parts lookup, service write-ups — not the job itself.

10-year outlook: Demand holds or grows with commercial building stock and ADA enforcement; the change over ten years is that quoting, scheduling, and diagnostics prompts get software-driven while the wrench work and the inspection signature stay human.

Score — 67/100 resistance

Five dimensions, 0–20 each, summed. Higher means more protected. The arithmetic is shown so you can check it: 17 + 19 + 7 + 12 + 12 = 67.

Task resistance 17/20

Tasks largely resist digitisation. Winding a torsion spring to the right turns on a door whose original hardware nobody documented, then shimming a jamb that settled three inches out of plumb, is trial-and-adjust physical judgment with no digitizable intermediate — the only tasks a model touches are the parts lookup and the invoice, which is why this lands at 17 and not a full 20.

Embodiment 19/20

Hands-on in uncontrolled environments. Ladders, cramped vestibules, live 120V operators, overhead loads under lethal spring tension, freezing loading docks and active traffic doorways in occupied buildings — 19 reflects that every billable minute happens at the door itself, in a space configured by someone else decades ago.

Liability shield 7/20

Certification preferred, not legally required. There is no door-technician licence in most states; you may hold an electrical or low-voltage card, IDA/AAADM certification for automatic pedestrian doors, and you sign the annual AAADM inspection label — real paperwork, but the building owner and GC carry the exposure, which caps this at 7 rather than the 12+ an electrician's licence would earn.

Trust premium 12/20

Some relationship component. Property managers and facility directors call the tech who already knows which of their forty dock doors has the bad photo-eye and who will come at 6am before the store opens — the repeat service contract is sticky, but the door still gets fixed if a different van shows up, so 12 not 16.

Judgment & accountability 12/20

Meaningful discretion. Deciding whether a fire-rated rolling door needs a drop test or full replacement, whether a cracked cable and worn drum means shut the bay down now, and calling a sensor a life-safety failure on a door thousands of people walk through daily is genuine discretion — but ANSI/DASMA and AAADM procedures and manufacturer specs frame most of those calls, holding this at 12.

Scored twice. An independent second run returned 67/100 — SAFE, agreeing with the verdict above.

This score sits on a verdict boundary. At 67/100 it is one point from EXPOSED. Re-scoring moves results by a point or two, so here the score is more informative than the label.

Confidence: high · reviewed 2026-08-11 · how scoring works

Tasks already automatable

What survives

Active moats: embodiment, physical-presence, trust

How to future-proof this job

Field report — do you do this job?

Has AI actually changed your work?

Self-reported and unverified — a sentiment signal, not a survey. One response per person per occupation; you can change your answer.

From people who do this job

Nobody has filed one yet. If you do this work, you know things the rubric can't see.

What has actually changed in your work?

Concrete beats general: a tool that arrived, a task that moved, a headcount decision you watched happen. Don't include anything that identifies you or your employer if that would put you at risk.