← Risk register SOC 31-1131 · reviewed 2026-08-11

Nursing Assistants

1,448,910 US workers · median $42,260/yr · Healthcare Support

SAFE

Nearly all of the job is physical contact work in unpredictable bodies and rooms: bathing, toileting, repositioning, transferring with a gait belt or Hoyer lift, feeding residents who choke, changing linens, walking someone who may fall. No robot does this at price, and the paperwork slice AI could take — charting vitals, intake/output logs, shift notes — is a small fraction of the hours. The real threat to this occupation is wage suppression and understaffing, not replacement.

10-year outlook: Demand grows hard with the aging population and this work stays human for the next decade; the fight is over wages, staffing ratios, and injury rates, not over whether the job exists.

US employment, 2019–2025+2.0%
1,419,9201,448,910 workers

Roughly flat across the period, with year-to-year wobble.

Median pay $29,660 → $42,260 +14.0% in real terms (nominal +42.5%, less ~25% US inflation over the period)

The job count is not the verdict

This line is counted by the Bureau of Labor Statistics — the one figure on this page that isn't a judgement of ours. Headcount moves on demand, offshoring, demographics and the business cycle, and automation is one term among several, often not the loudest.

So a falling line is not evidence that AI did it, and a rising one is not evidence that it won't. Both happen in this register: some occupations resist automation and shrink anyway, others are highly automatable and keep growing. The marked year is 2020.

BLS projection, 2024–2034

+2.3% 1,441,500 → 1,474,000 on the projections basis

Hard to automate, and growing

The work resists current AI and the BLS projects +2.3% more of these jobs by 2034. Note that safe does not mean well paid — several of the fastest-growing resistant occupations are among the lowest paid on the register.

Different clocks. The score is what current AI could do to this work today. The projection is how many of these jobs will exist in 2034. Everything between the two — how fast employers actually adopt, whether demand grows in the meantime — is why they can point opposite ways without either being wrong.

~204,100 openings a year on average, including replacing people who leave.

One email if this score changes. Watch as many occupations as you like from the same address — no account, and nothing is sent on a schedule, only when a verdict actually moves.

Also known as — 24 job titles this covers

Titles reported by people doing this work, from the US Department of Labor's O*NET survey. If your job title is here, this page is about your work even though the name doesn't match.

Ward AideNurse AideHealth AideWard HelperHospice AideNurse SitterNursing AideGericare AideHospital AidePatient SitterWard AttendantBirth AttendantMedication AideNurse AssistantHealth Care AideNurse TechnicianHospital CorpsmanNurse's AssistantNursing AssistantNursing AttendantNursing Home AideClinical AssistantHospital AttendantInstitutional Aide

Score — 68/100 resistance

Holding it up: embodiment (20/20). Weakest point: judgment & accountability (8/20).

Five dimensions, 0–20 each, summed. Higher means more protected. The arithmetic is shown so you can check it: 16 + 20 + 9 + 15 + 8 = 68. · Scored 2026-08-11, and re-examined when evidence accumulates rather than on a schedule.

Task resistance 16/20

Tasks largely resist digitisation The automatable slice — vitals entry into the EHR, I&O totals, ADL flowsheets — is maybe 30-45 minutes of a 12-hour shift, while incontinence care, bed baths, two-person transfers, and hand-feeding a dysphagia resident spoonful by spoonful cannot be decomposed into steps a machine executes, which is why this sits at 16 rather than in the mixed band.

Embodiment 20/20

Hands-on in uncontrolled environments You work inside another person's body space in rooms you don't control: kneeling on a bathroom floor to clean a resident who has soiled themselves, catching someone whose knees buckle mid-transfer, turning a 250-pound contracted patient every two hours, absorbing scratches and bites from residents with dementia — there is no version of this performed at a screen, so 20 is the only score available.

Liability shield 9/20

Certification preferred, not legally required CNA certification is a real state credential with a registry, 75+ federally mandated training hours under OBRA '87, and a competency exam, and you can be listed for abuse or neglect — but you practice under delegated nursing authority, the RN owns the care plan and the assessment, and no malpractice claim names you as the responsible clinician, which caps this at 9 instead of the 14+ a licensed nurse gets.

Trust premium 15/20

The human relationship is the product Residents in long-term care see the same aide for months and will let only that person touch them during peri-care, and you are the one who notices the new bruise, the refused breakfast, or the change in mood that never made it into a chart — the score stops at 15 rather than 18 because facility staffing churn, agency shifts, and floating assignments mean the institution, not you, keeps the relationship on paper.

Judgment & accountability 8/20

Meaningful discretion Most of your shift runs on the assignment sheet and care plan — turn schedules, mechanical-lift-only orders, thickened liquids, fall precautions — and the consequential decisions get escalated to the charge nurse; the 8 reflects the discretion that genuinely is yours: deciding this transfer needs a second person today, judging that a resident's confusion is new enough to report now, calling it before a skin breakdown becomes a stage two.

Confidence: high · reviewed 2026-08-11 · how scoring works

What this job involves — and which parts are yours

The verdict above describes this occupation as a whole. Almost nobody does the typical version of a job — tick what's actually in your week and see how your own mix sits.

AI already does these at usable quality

These still need a person

Active moats on the surviving side: embodiment, trust, licensure

How to future-proof this job

Where to go deeper on what this job runs on: Coursera — customer service and client-facing skill courses free to audit · Coursera — active listening and communication skills free to audit · Coursera — communication and interpersonal skills free to audit · edX — performance measurement and evaluation free to audit · Khan Academy — reading and vocabulary, all levels, free free · Toastmasters — public speaking practice at local clubs worldwide low

All 35 skills ranked by how many jobs they open →

What would move this back up — beyond any one person

The moves above are yours to make. This is the other half: what would have to change in the world for the occupation itself to score higher. None of it is in any one person's gift, but it is where the floor actually comes from. Scores here are not a one-way ratchet. Only two of the five dimensions — task resistance and embodiment — track what machines can do. The other three track law, what buyers will pay for, and who is answerable, and those move in both directions, often in response to the same pressure AI creates. If every lever below landed, this occupation would score around 83/100, still SAFE.

6 specific changes that would raise this score
  • already happening liability shield +4

    Enforcement of the CMS 2024 minimum staffing final rule (2.45 nurse-aide hours per resident day, 24/7 RN) plus state ratio laws in the mold of California's AB 394 extended to certified aides, so a facility's Medicare certification and survey standing depend on a counted number of credentialed human aide hours that no software substitution can satisfy

  • already happening trust premium +2

    Growth of private-pay and consumer-directed home care (Medicaid self-direction, VA Veteran-Directed Care) where the family selects and retains a named aide and explicitly refuses monitoring-and-check-in substitution; union contracts such as SEIU 775's training-and-wage boards that market a credentialed named caregiver

  • already happening task resistance +2

    Ambient charting and sensor-based vitals absorbing the documentation slice, leaving a residual day that is almost entirely contact work and judgment under ambiguity — a genuine two-tier shift, though the routine tier is only a small share of hours here so the headroom is small

  • plausible judgment accountability +3

    Formal recognition of aide-initiated escalation in survey and payment protocols — INTERACT 'Stop and Watch' or sepsis change-of-condition tools written into facility policy so a documented aide report triggers mandatory nurse assessment, making the aide the accountable first detector rather than an informal reporter

  • plausible liability shield +2

    State nurse aide registry rules that make the individual CNA's credential the recordable unit for abuse/neglect findings and for countersigning AI-generated vitals and I&O entries in the EHR — i.e. the aide, not the sensor, owns the chart entry

  • plausible judgment accountability +2

    Fall-risk and transfer decisions (one-person vs two-person, mechanical lift vs gait belt) delegated in writing to the aide at point of care under safe-patient-handling laws, with the aide's assessment being the operative call when a sensor or care plan disagrees

The limit. Embodiment is already maxed and task_resistance is near ceiling, so realistic upside is a handful of points from staffing-mandate and escalation-role changes. Note that none of these address the actual live risk: understaffing and wage suppression can hollow out the job's conditions while every displacement score stays high.

These are conditions, not forecasts — what would have to happen, not what will. Specific rules, cases and bills are named so you can go and check whether they exist and where they stand; verify before relying on any of them. Nothing here is legal or financial advice.

Where this work is, and what it pays there

BLS metro figures for 383 areas. The verdict above does not change by city — the rubric judges what the work involves, not where it happens — but pay and headcount do, and the national median hides a very wide range.

Most of these jobs

New York-Newark-Jersey City, NY-NJ 79,480 $49,270 +17%
Chicago-Naperville-Elgin, IL-IN 45,850 $46,940 +11%
Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim, CA 43,090 $47,380 +12%
Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington, PA-NJ-DE-MD 30,680 $46,220 +9%
Boston-Cambridge-Newton, MA-NH 26,130 $47,590 +13%
Washington-Arlington-Alexandria, DC-VA-MD-WV 25,520 $45,730 +8%
Miami-Fort Lauderdale-West Palm Beach, FL 23,490 $38,010 -10%
Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington, TX 23,420 $38,530 -9%

Best paid

San Jose-Sunnyvale-Santa Clara, CA 5,350 $56,840 +35%
San Francisco-Oakland-Fremont, CA 11,790 $56,080 +33%
Seattle-Tacoma-Bellevue, WA 16,530 $51,990 +23%

Percentages are against this occupation's national median of $42,260. Counts are jobs in that metro, not vacancies. Metros where the BLS suppressed the cell are absent rather than shown as zero.

Who is actually doing this — nobody, on the record

We have no reported case of a named organisation automating this occupation. Not one deployment, not one announcement.

That is worth saying out loud next to a score of 68. The verdict above is about what the work exposes — what current AI could do to these tasks. It is not a claim that anyone has done it. For this occupation those two things have come apart completely: the capability argument is on this page, and the evidence column is empty.

Read that as a gap in the reporting we can see, not proof of absence — the dispatch runs on English-language feeds and misses plenty. If you know of a case, tell us, or add a field report from inside the job.

Quick take — do you do this job?

Has AI actually changed your work? One tap, anonymous, and the running tally is public. Nothing else is asked of you.

Self-reported and unverified — a sentiment signal, not a survey. One response per person per occupation; you can change your answer.

Field reports — what people say has changed

No field reports yet. A written account takes a paragraph rather than a tap, goes to an editor before it appears, and is the one thing on this page the rubric cannot produce on its own.

File a field report

Concrete beats general: a tool that arrived, a task that moved, a headcount decision you watched happen. Don't include anything that identifies you or your employer if that would put you at risk.

Watch this verdict
Kept current

Rather than check back: get the digest and we'll tell you what changed — or watch a single occupation from its own page.