← Risk register SOC 25-2011 · reviewed 2026-08-11

Preschool Teachers, Except Special Education

478,780 US workers · median $38,140/yr · Education

SAFE

The core of this job is physically supervising, calming, feeding, toileting, and redirecting a room of three- and four-year-olds — none of which is screen work and none of which current robotics touches. AI can draft lesson plans, generate activity ideas, write parent newsletters, and organize developmental observation notes, which trims paperwork hours but not staffing. State child-care licensing sets adult-to-child ratios and minimum credentials (CDA or associate/bachelor's depending on state), so a warm body with a background check is legally mandatory regardless of software.

10-year outlook: Employment holds or grows with public pre-K expansion; AI removes paperwork hours and never removes the adult required in the room, though pay stays the field's real problem rather than automation.

US employment, 2019–2025+11.0%
431,350478,780 workers

Dipped in 2020, then grew past where it started.

Median pay $30,520 → $38,140 -0.0% in real terms (nominal +25.0%, less ~25% US inflation over the period)

The job count is not the verdict

This line is counted by the Bureau of Labor Statistics — the one figure on this page that isn't a judgement of ours. Headcount moves on demand, offshoring, demographics and the business cycle, and automation is one term among several, often not the loudest.

So a falling line is not evidence that AI did it, and a rising one is not evidence that it won't. Both happen in this register: some occupations resist automation and shrink anyway, others are highly automatable and keep growing. The marked year is 2020.

BLS projection, 2024–2034

+4.1%

Percentage only. The projection counts a different population from the 478,780 above — it includes self-employed workers, which for this occupation is most of them, so the two headcounts are not comparable.

Hard to automate, and growing

The work resists current AI and the BLS projects +4.1% more of these jobs by 2034. Note that safe does not mean well paid — several of the fastest-growing resistant occupations are among the lowest paid on the register.

Different clocks. The score is what current AI could do to this work today. The projection is how many of these jobs will exist in 2034. Everything between the two — how fast employers actually adopt, whether demand grows in the meantime — is why they can point opposite ways without either being wrong.

~65,500 openings a year on average, including replacing people who leave.

One email if this score changes. Watch as many occupations as you like from the same address — no account, and nothing is sent on a schedule, only when a verdict actually moves.

Also known as — 24 job titles this covers

Titles reported by people doing this work, from the US Department of Labor's O*NET survey. If your job title is here, this page is about your work even though the name doesn't match.

TeacherGroup TeacherStart TeacherInfant TeacherDaycare TeacherNursery TeacherToddler TeacherDay Care TeacherChildcare TeacherPreschool TeacherMontessori TeacherPre-School TeacherAfter School TeacherNursery School TeacherEarly Childhood TeacherPrekindergarten TeacherEarly Childhood EducatorChild Development TeacherMontessori ParaprofessionalChild Care Assistant TeacherHome-Based Preschool TeacherMontessori Preschool TeacherSubstitute Preschool TeacherChildhood Development Teacher

Score — 73/100 resistance

Holding it up: embodiment (19/20). Weakest point: liability shield (9/20).

Five dimensions, 0–20 each, summed. Higher means more protected. The arithmetic is shown so you can check it: 16 + 19 + 9 + 17 + 12 = 73. · Scored 2026-08-11, and re-examined when evidence accumulates rather than on a schedule.

Task resistance 16/20

Tasks largely resist digitisation Zipping coats, wiping noses, breaking up a block-tower dispute, and reading a picture book to twelve kids who are all touching each other are the actual hours of the day; what AI can take is the lesson-plan template, the weekly parent email, and the typing-up of anecdotal records — maybe 4-6 hours a week out of a 40-hour job, which is why this sits at 16 and not 20.

Embodiment 19/20

Hands-on in uncontrolled environments Diapering and toilet-accident cleanup, lifting a thrashing 35-pound child away from a hazard, outdoor playground supervision in weather, floor-level circle time, and knowing by touch that a forehead is too warm — all in a room where the environment is defined by unpredictable small humans, which is as uncontrolled as workplaces get short of disaster response.

Liability shield 9/20

Certification preferred, not legally required State child-care licensing requires a credential (CDA, associate, or in some states bachelor's), a background check, and mandated-reporter training, and you can be personally named in a licensing violation — but it is a facility license and a director's license on the line, not an individually revocable practice license like an RN or attorney, which caps this at 9.

Trust premium 17/20

The human relationship is the product Parents choose and stay at a center because of the specific teacher who knows their kid falls apart before nap and greets them by name at drop-off; attachment research and the fact that a beloved teacher's departure triggers withdrawals make the individual relationship the enrollment, not a nicety around it.

Judgment & accountability 12/20

Meaningful discretion You decide in real time whether a bruise pattern triggers a CPS call, whether a bite is developmental or a pattern to document, and whether to flag a speech delay to parents who don't want to hear it — genuinely consequential calls, but framed by state licensing rules, curriculum frameworks, and a director you can escalate to, which keeps it at 12 rather than the high teens.

Scored twice. An independent second run returned 70/100 — SAFE, agreeing with the verdict above.

Confidence: high · reviewed 2026-08-11 · how scoring works

What this job involves — and which parts are yours

The verdict above describes this occupation as a whole. Almost nobody does the typical version of a job — tick what's actually in your week and see how your own mix sits.

AI already does these at usable quality

These still need a person

Active moats on the surviving side: embodiment, trust, licensure

How to future-proof this job

Where to go deeper on what this job runs on: Toastmasters — public speaking practice at local clubs worldwide low · Coursera — teaching and instructional design, audit free free to audit · Coursera — active listening and communication skills free to audit · Learning How to Learn — the most-taken course on Coursera, and free free to audit · Khan Academy — reading and vocabulary, all levels, free free · Coursera — critical thinking and logic, audit free free to audit

All 35 skills ranked by how many jobs they open →

What would move this back up — beyond any one person

The moves above are yours to make. This is the other half: what would have to change in the world for the occupation itself to score higher. None of it is in any one person's gift, but it is where the floor actually comes from. Scores here are not a one-way ratchet. Only two of the five dimensions — task resistance and embodiment — track what machines can do. The other three track law, what buyers will pay for, and who is answerable, and those move in both directions, often in response to the same pressure AI creates. If every lever below landed, this occupation would score around 85/100, still SAFE.

4 specific changes that would raise this score
  • already happening liability shield +4

    State licensing rules that tighten ratio and credential floors — e.g. states adopting NAEYC-aligned 1:8 ratios for four-year-olds, or moving from CDA-acceptable to mandatory associate degree for lead teachers (as DC's 2016 rule did) — plus universal pre-K statutes (NY, CA TK, NM) that write certified-lead-teacher-per-classroom into funded program rules. Also mandatory-reporter status for suspected abuse, which attaches personal duty to a named adult.

  • already happening task resistance +2

    Task-mix shift as AI absorbs the paperwork tier (lesson plans, observation write-ups, portfolio assembly, parent communications, state QRIS documentation), leaving a day that is almost entirely in-body supervision, conflict mediation, and family relationship work. The residual job is the tier machines do not touch.

  • plausible judgment accountability +4

    Formal assignment of developmental screening and referral duty to the lead teacher under IDEA Part B/C Child Find — where the classroom teacher signs the screening instrument (ASQ-3, DIAL-4) that triggers evaluation, and owns suspension/expulsion decisions under state early-childhood expulsion-ban laws that require documented behavioral intervention before removal.

  • plausible trust premium +2

    Parent demand shifting further toward low-screen, high-adult-contact models — Waldorf/Montessori/forest-school enrollment growth and state rules capping screen time in licensed care (several states limit screen media for under-2s and cap it for preschoolers) make human presence the explicit product being purchased.

The limit. Already 73 with embodiment at 19 and trust at 17; those are near max. The binding constraint on this occupation is wages and turnover, not displacement — the register does not score that, so a high score here should not be read as a good job.

These are conditions, not forecasts — what would have to happen, not what will. Specific rules, cases and bills are named so you can go and check whether they exist and where they stand; verify before relying on any of them. Nothing here is legal or financial advice.

Where this work is, and what it pays there

BLS metro figures for 381 areas. The verdict above does not change by city — the rubric judges what the work involves, not where it happens — but pay and headcount do, and the national median hides a very wide range.

Most of these jobs

New York-Newark-Jersey City, NY-NJ 28,140 $50,230 +32%
Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim, CA 18,430 $46,600 +22%
Chicago-Naperville-Elgin, IL-IN 17,180 $43,050 +13%
Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington, PA-NJ-DE-MD 15,260 $36,750 -4%
Boston-Cambridge-Newton, MA-NH 14,500 $46,030 +21%
Washington-Arlington-Alexandria, DC-VA-MD-WV 11,910 $44,660 +17%
Miami-Fort Lauderdale-West Palm Beach, FL 11,650 $36,380 -5%
Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington, TX 11,100 $35,190 -8%

Best paid

Vineland, NJ 330 $63,340 +66%
Albany, GA 400 $62,680 +64%
Atlantic City-Hammonton, NJ 460 $59,320 +56%

Percentages are against this occupation's national median of $38,140. Counts are jobs in that metro, not vacancies. Metros where the BLS suppressed the cell are absent rather than shown as zero.

Who is actually doing this — nobody, on the record

We have no reported case of a named organisation automating this occupation. Not one deployment, not one announcement.

That is worth saying out loud next to a score of 73. The verdict above is about what the work exposes — what current AI could do to these tasks. It is not a claim that anyone has done it. For this occupation those two things have come apart completely: the capability argument is on this page, and the evidence column is empty.

Read that as a gap in the reporting we can see, not proof of absence — the dispatch runs on English-language feeds and misses plenty. If you know of a case, tell us, or add a field report from inside the job.

Quick take — do you do this job?

Has AI actually changed your work? One tap, anonymous, and the running tally is public. Nothing else is asked of you.

Self-reported and unverified — a sentiment signal, not a survey. One response per person per occupation; you can change your answer.

Field reports — what people say has changed

No field reports yet. A written account takes a paragraph rather than a tap, goes to an editor before it appears, and is the one thing on this page the rubric cannot produce on its own.

File a field report

Concrete beats general: a tool that arrived, a task that moved, a headcount decision you watched happen. Don't include anything that identifies you or your employer if that would put you at risk.

Watch this verdict
Kept current

Rather than check back: get the digest and we'll tell you what changed — or watch a single occupation from its own page.