← Risk register SOC 29-1141 · reviewed 2026-08-11

Registered Nurses

3,379,720 US workers · median $97,550/yr · Healthcare

SAFE

The bulk of an RN's shift is physical and interpersonal: starting IVs, assessing wounds, repositioning patients, administering meds, catching the subtle change in color or breathing that precedes a crash. AI is already eating the documentation layer — charting, discharge summaries, care-plan drafts, triage protocols, insurance paperwork — which is real time savings but not the job. State licensure, personal accountability for medication errors, and the fact that patients and families want a human at the bedside keep this occupation firmly intact; the near-term risk is not replacement but higher patient ratios justified by 'AI efficiency'.

10-year outlook: Demand keeps rising with an aging population; AI will strip out documentation hours, and the fight over the next decade is whether that time returns to patients or becomes justification for heavier assignments.

Score — 80/100 resistance

Five dimensions, 0–20 each, summed. Higher means more protected. The arithmetic is shown so you can check it: 14 + 19 + 16 + 17 + 14 = 80.

Task resistance 14/20

Tasks largely resist digitisation. At 14 the score credits that hanging a piggyback, titrating pressors to a MAP target, doing a neuro check q1h, and de-escalating a confused post-op patient at 3am cannot be done through a screen — but it stops short of 18 because charting, care-plan generation, SBAR handoff drafts, discharge instructions, and acuity/triage scoring are genuinely automatable and can eat 20-30% of a shift.

Embodiment 19/20

Hands-on in uncontrolled environments. 19 reflects that the work happens in rooms with vomit, code carts, combative patients, and bariatric transfers — you cannot start a 20-gauge in a dehydrated 88-year-old, palpate a rigid abdomen, or feel a thready radial pulse remotely, and the physical unpredictability of a med-surg floor is why this sits at the ceiling rather than in the 13-15 range of clinic-based roles.

Liability shield 16/20

Licensed human required and personally liable. State board licensure with a personal NPI, a named signature on every MAR entry, and the reality that a wrong-patient insulin dose goes to the Board of Nursing under your license — not the hospital's — puts this at 16, held below 19 only because RNs practice under physician orders and protocols rather than holding independent prescriptive authority.

Trust premium 17/20

The human relationship is the product. 17 because the patient's willingness to admit they haven't taken their metformin in three weeks, or the family's decision to accept comfort care, turns on the nurse who has been in the room for twelve hours — though unlike a primary care panel the relationship is usually shift-length, not years-long, which is what separates this from 20.

Judgment & accountability 14/20

Exists to be accountable for ambiguous calls. Deciding whether the drop in urine output warrants waking the intensivist, whether to hold a beta blocker at a borderline pressure, or whether this patient is septic before the lactate returns are ambiguous calls with defined consequences — 14 rather than 18 because much of that discretion runs through standing orders, rapid-response criteria, and escalation to a physician who owns the final diagnostic decision.

Confidence: high · reviewed 2026-08-11 · how scoring works · 1 deployment report on file

Tasks already automatable

What survives

Active moats: embodiment, licensure, trust, judgment

How to future-proof this job

Who is actually doing this

The score above is about what the work exposes. This is reporting about real deployments in this occupation — the difference between "could be automated" and "somebody automated it."

Mercy

Field report — do you do this job?

Has AI actually changed your work?

Self-reported and unverified — a sentiment signal, not a survey. One response per person per occupation; you can change your answer.

From people who do this job

Nobody has filed one yet. If you do this work, you know things the rubric can't see.

What has actually changed in your work?

Concrete beats general: a tool that arrived, a task that moved, a headcount decision you watched happen. Don't include anything that identifies you or your employer if that would put you at risk.