EXPOSED
The screen-side half of this job — playout scheduling, ingest, log verification, loudness and signal monitoring, switching pre-recorded segments — has been getting automated for two decades by playout systems and centralcasting hubs that run dozens of stations from one room, and AI monitoring closes the remaining gap. What persists is hands-on: climbing to transmitter and STL sites, swapping failed amplifiers and cards, rigging cameras, audio, and IP encoders for live remotes, and fixing a live signal chain in the 90 seconds you have. Employment is already shrinking through consolidation rather than through robots, and the surviving jobs are the RF/IT engineering tier, not the master-control chair.
Part 2020 shock, part continued decline in the years since.
Median pay $40,570 → $59,570 +17.5% in real terms
This line is counted by the Bureau of Labor Statistics — the one figure on this page that isn't a judgement of ours. Headcount moves on demand, offshoring, demographics and the business cycle, and automation is one term among several, often not the loudest.
So a falling line is not evidence that AI did it, and a rising one is not evidence that it won't. Both happen in this register: some occupations resist automation and shrink anyway, others are highly automatable and keep growing. The marked year is 2020.
BLS projection, 2024–2034
-2.8%
Percentage only. The projection counts a different population from the 21,110 above — it includes self-employed workers, which for this occupation is most of them, so the two headcounts are not comparable.
Exposed, and shrinking
Both signals point the same way: the tasks are largely automatable and the BLS projects -2.8% by 2034. This is the case where the score and the forecast agree, and it is the one worth taking seriously.
Different clocks. The score is what current AI could do to this work today. The projection is how many of these jobs will exist in 2034. Everything between the two — how fast employers actually adopt, whether demand grows in the meantime — is why they can point opposite ways without either being wrong.
~1,800 openings a year on average, including replacing people who leave.
TV TechnicianAudio EngineerAudio OperatorBoard OperatorMixer OperatorRadio EngineerVideo OperatorSignal EngineerStudio EngineerColor TechnicianControl EngineerControl OperatorMedia TechnicianRadio TechnicianSound ControllerStation EngineerProgram SchedulerStudio TechnicianTelecine OperatorBroadcast EngineerFacsimile OperatorOperating EngineerStudio CoordinatorVideotape Operator
Holding it up: embodiment . Weakest point: liability shield .
Mixed — a routine tier and a judgment tier Automated playout, file-based ingest, template-driven graphics and remote loudness/PPM monitoring already cover most of a master-control shift, and centralcasting means one hub operator handles the log for dozens of stations — the 8 reflects that only the unscripted half (chasing an intermittent SDI fault, rebuilding a signal chain mid-newscast, tuning a transmitter after a lightning hit) still needs a person in the building.
Hands-on in uncontrolled environments A 13 is earned by the tower and remote-truck side: climbing or at least working at the base of transmitter and STL sites, pulling and terminating SDI/fiber/XLR, swapping PA modules and blown power supplies in a hot rack room, and rigging cameras and IP encoders at a stadium in the rain — not a 17, because a growing share of hours are still spent seated at a monitoring wall in a climate-controlled MCR.
No licence, no signature requirement The FCC dropped the operator-licence requirement decades ago; SBE certification (CBT, CBRE) is a hiring preference and a pay bump, not a legal gate, and when a station blows its power limit or misses EAS the fine lands on the licensee, not on the technician who was on shift.
Meaningful discretion Most of the shift follows the log, the maintenance schedule, and EAS procedure, but the 7 covers the live calls nobody documents: deciding to cut to backup transmitter versus riding out a VSWR alarm, choosing which path to drop when bandwidth collapses on a remote, and triaging a failure on air with the clock running — high-stakes in seconds, but bounded by engineering fact rather than open ambiguity.
The verdict above describes this occupation as a whole. Almost nobody does the typical version of a job — tick what's actually in your week and see how your own mix sits.
Your task mix speaks to task resistance (8/20 here) — how much of the day's work current AI already does. That is the dimension the boxes above are about.
It cannot move the other three. Liability shield (3/20) is whether the law requires a licensed human to sign. Trust premium (4/20) is whether buyers specifically pay for a person. Judgment and accountability (7/20) is whether the role exists to own consequential calls. Those are facts about the occupation's standing, not about which tasks are in your week — a paralegal who does only trial exhibits still holds no licence. Together they are 14 of this occupation's 35 points (40%).
Embodiment (13/20) is also a property of the work rather than the worker, but we don't tag individual tasks as physical or not, so the picker can't tell you anything about it. That's a limit of this tool, not a claim.
Did we get the list right? Tell us what's missing — the tasks are written from the outside, and you're reading this from the inside.
Audio and Video Technicians EXPOSED
The moves above are yours to make. This is the other half: what would have to change in the world for the occupation itself to score higher. None of it is in any one person's gift, but it is where the floor actually comes from. Scores here are not a one-way ratchet. Only two of the five dimensions — task resistance and embodiment — track what machines can do. The other three track law, what buyers will pay for, and who is answerable, and those move in both directions, often in response to the same pressure AI creates. If every lever below landed, this occupation would score around 50/100, still EXPOSED.
Task-mix shift is the real lever and it is already underway: as master-control playout, log verification and loudness monitoring are fully hubbed out, the surviving headcount is the RF/IP engineering tier — transmitter maintenance, STL and ATSC 3.0 gateway configuration, SMPTE 2110 network troubleshooting, live remote encoder setup — none of which current models can do end-to-end. If the routine chair disappears entirely and the remaining title is functionally 'broadcast engineer', measured resistance rises even as total employment falls.
If centralcasting hubs push one engineer's on-call radius to cover dozens of stations, the person deciding whether to take a transmitter off air, run reduced power, or ride out a fault during a hurricane or wildfire alert owns a call with real regulatory and public-safety consequences under time pressure — accountability concentrates as headcount thins.
ATSC 3.0 buildouts, C-band spectrum repack follow-on work, and datacasting add tower-climb, antenna and transmitter-site work in unpredictable outdoor conditions; combined with FCC-mandated EAS equipment checks and post-storm site restoration, the physical share of the day grows as the desk share vanishes.
Two concrete hooks exist: FCC EAS rules (47 CFR Part 11) requiring station personnel to verify alert transmission and file ETRS Form One/Two, and OSHA/FCC tower-climbing rules plus NATE safety standards that effectively require a qualified named human on RF-hazard and climb work. A rule change requiring a named, certified station engineer of record — analogous to the old first-class radiotelephone operator license the FCC eliminated in 1981, or SBE certification being written into station licenses or insurer requirements for tower work — would be the identifiable event.
The limit. No plausible route to a trust premium: audiences and advertisers never see or pay for this role, and the buyer is a consolidating station group whose explicit strategy is fewer engineers per signal. Even with every lever, employment keeps shrinking — resistance here describes the survivors, not the size of the field.
| New York-Newark-Jersey City, NY-NJ | 2,010 | $96,820 +63% |
| Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim, CA | 960 | — |
| Washington-Arlington-Alexandria, DC-VA-MD-WV | 710 | $75,010 +26% |
| Denver-Aurora-Centennial, CO | 700 | $78,050 +31% |
| San Francisco-Oakland-Fremont, CA | 540 | $77,790 +31% |
| Chicago-Naperville-Elgin, IL-IN | 520 | $96,060 +61% |
| Miami-Fort Lauderdale-West Palm Beach, FL | 510 | $74,490 +25% |
| Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington, TX | 490 | $63,500 +7% |
| Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington, PA-NJ-DE-MD | 460 | $103,180 +73% |
| New York-Newark-Jersey City, NY-NJ | 2,010 | $96,820 +63% |
| Chicago-Naperville-Elgin, IL-IN | 520 | $96,060 +61% |
Deadline reports E.W. Scripps' CEO told investors about major layoffs while promoting AI adoption in its local TV news operations.
Scripps cut jobs at a Texas television newsroom as the company shifts toward an AI-based production model, according to the San Antonio Express-News.
Has AI actually changed your work? One tap, anonymous, and the running tally is public. Nothing else is asked of you.
Rather than check back: get the digest and we'll tell you what changed — or watch a single occupation from its own page.