← Risk register SOC 27-2022 · reviewed 2026-08-11

Coaches and Scouts

248,950 US workers · median $47,320/yr · Media

SAFE

The modal worker here is a high school or youth-level coach, not a pro scout: the job is standing on a field or court demonstrating technique, correcting a 14-year-old's footwork in real time, managing a locker room, and deciding who plays. None of that digitizes — but the scouting half of this title is genuinely exposed, since video-tracking and predictive models already do much of the talent-identification and opponent-tendency work that scouts once produced by hand. Sign-off liability is thin (CPR/concussion certs, state coaching credentials, not professional licensure), so the moats are physical presence, athlete trust, and ownership of playing-time and safety calls.

10-year outlook: In-person coaching demand holds steady with youth sports participation, while pure scouting and film-breakdown roles shrink as clubs replace headcount with tracking data and video models.

US employment, 2019–2025+3.1%
241,390248,950 workers

Roughly flat across the period, with year-to-year wobble.

Median pay $34,840 → $47,320 +8.7% in real terms (nominal +35.8%, less ~25% US inflation over the period)

The job count is not the verdict

This line is counted by the Bureau of Labor Statistics — the one figure on this page that isn't a judgement of ours. Headcount moves on demand, offshoring, demographics and the business cycle, and automation is one term among several, often not the loudest.

So a falling line is not evidence that AI did it, and a rising one is not evidence that it won't. Both happen in this register: some occupations resist automation and shrink anyway, others are highly automatable and keep growing. The marked year is 2020.

BLS projection, 2024–2034

+6.4%

Percentage only. The projection counts a different population from the 248,950 above — it includes self-employed workers, which for this occupation is most of them, so the two headcounts are not comparable.

Hard to automate, and growing

The work resists current AI and the BLS projects +6.4% more of these jobs by 2034. Note that safe does not mean well paid — several of the fastest-growing resistant occupations are among the lowest paid on the register.

Different clocks. The score is what current AI could do to this work today. The projection is how many of these jobs will exist in 2034. Everything between the two — how fast employers actually adopt, whether demand grows in the meantime — is why they can point opposite ways without either being wrong.

~41,800 openings a year on average, including replacing people who leave.

One email if this score changes. Watch as many occupations as you like from the same address — no account, and nothing is sent on a schedule, only when a verdict actually moves.

Also known as — 24 job titles this covers

Titles reported by people doing this work, from the US Department of Labor's O*NET survey. If your job title is here, this page is about your work even though the name doesn't match.

CoachSki CoachGolf CoachSwim CoachTrack CoachBoxing CoachGolf TeacherHockey ScoutJudo TeacherRiding CoachSoccer CoachTennis CoachCollege CoachFitness CoachAthletic CoachAthletic ScoutBaseball CoachBaseball ScoutBoxing TrainerFootball CoachKarate TeacherLacrosse CoachRiding TeacherSki Instructor

Score — 68/100 resistance

Holding it up: embodiment (17/20). Weakest point: liability shield (5/20).

Five dimensions, 0–20 each, summed. Higher means more protected. The arithmetic is shown so you can check it: 15 + 17 + 5 + 17 + 14 = 68. · Scored 2026-08-11, and re-examined when evidence accumulates rather than on a schedule.

Task resistance 15/20

Tasks largely resist digitisation Running a two-hour practice — cueing a swimmer's turn mid-set, breaking up a locker-room conflict, adjusting a game plan at halftime after seeing the other team's press — has no digitizable substitute, and the 15 rather than 19 reflects that film breakdown, opponent tendency reports, practice-plan drafting, and stat-based lineup analysis are already routinely offloaded to software and scouting platforms.

Embodiment 17/20

Hands-on in uncontrolled environments You are outdoors in heat and rain, throwing batting practice, holding blocking pads, spotting a gymnast on beam, and physically pulling a kid out of a drill before he gets hurt — the 17 rather than 20 only because meetings, film sessions, recruiting calls, and travel logistics take real hours off the field.

Liability shield 5/20

Certification preferred, not legally required CPR/AED, concussion protocol training, and a state coaching credential or NFHS certificate are the ceiling here; no board can revoke your right to coach, and when an injury lawsuit lands it names the district and the athletic director alongside you, which is why this sits at 5 and not in licensed-professional territory.

Trust premium 17/20

The human relationship is the product Parents hand over their kid, a senior decides whether to keep playing, and a recruit chooses a program largely because of who is going to coach them — that relationship is the retention mechanism and the reason coaching jobs follow individuals between programs, held just under the top band because wins and losses can override it fast.

Judgment & accountability 14/20

Exists to be accountable for ambiguous calls You decide who starts, who gets cut, whether a concussed or cramping athlete returns to play, and how much load a growing 15-year-old can take — calls made in seconds with incomplete information and real physical consequences, scoring 14 because playing-time and safety decisions are yours to own even though return-to-play protocols and eligibility rules constrain the edges.

Confidence: high · reviewed 2026-08-11 · how scoring works

What this job involves — and which parts are yours

The verdict above describes this occupation as a whole. Almost nobody does the typical version of a job — tick what's actually in your week and see how your own mix sits.

AI already does these at usable quality

These still need a person

Active moats on the surviving side: embodiment, trust, judgment

How to future-proof this job

Where to go deeper on what this job runs on: Coursera — teaching and instructional design, audit free free to audit · Toastmasters — public speaking practice at local clubs worldwide low · Learning How to Learn — the most-taken course on Coursera, and free free to audit · edX — performance measurement and evaluation free to audit · Khan Academy — reading and vocabulary, all levels, free free · Coursera — active listening and communication skills free to audit

All 35 skills ranked by how many jobs they open →

What would move this back up — beyond any one person

The moves above are yours to make. This is the other half: what would have to change in the world for the occupation itself to score higher. None of it is in any one person's gift, but it is where the floor actually comes from. Scores here are not a one-way ratchet. Only two of the five dimensions — task resistance and embodiment — track what machines can do. The other three track law, what buyers will pay for, and who is answerable, and those move in both directions, often in response to the same pressure AI creates. If every lever below landed, this occupation would score around 83/100, still SAFE.

5 specific changes that would raise this score
  • already happening liability shield +3

    Youth-sports liability insurers and national governing bodies (USA Football, US Club Soccer, USA Swimming post-SafeSport) conditioning coverage on a background-checked, certified named coach physically present per team — insurer riders excluding coverage for unsupervised app-directed training. Already partially in motion through SafeSport Act compliance requirements.

  • already happening task resistance +2

    Genuine two-tier structure: if video-tracking and predictive models absorb the routine scouting tier (opponent tendency charts, first-pass talent screens — already standard via Hudl, Synergy, TrackMan), the surviving scout work is in-person character/makeup assessment, family and coach interviews, and signing-risk arbitration, which is the judgment tier. Composition shift raises resistance even with no new capability barrier.

  • plausible liability shield +5

    State-level coach credentialing moving from a certificate to true licensure with a named, personally accountable 'coach of record' — the pattern already visible in state concussion return-to-play statutes (all 50 states have Lystedt-style laws) and in newer heat-illness and cardiac-emergency-action-plan mandates (e.g., Korey Stringer Institute-backed state rules) that require a named certified adult to authorize removal and clearance. If a state board adds registry-based discipline plus a requirement that the licensed coach countersign any AI-generated load/return-to-play recommendation, the shield goes from thin to real.

  • plausible judgment accountability +3

    Litigation and settlements naming individual coaches (not just districts) for playing-time-after-symptom and heat-exposure decisions, making the documented judgment call personally attributable rather than institutional. Where districts adopt policies requiring the coach to sign the removal/clearance log, the role formally owns the ambiguous safety call.

  • plausible trust premium +2

    Continued growth of paid private instruction and NIL/recruiting advisory where families pay specifically for a named human with placement track record — visible in the private skills-trainer and recruiting-consultant market. Any state regulation of paid recruiting advisors (bills of this type have been floated around NIL agent registration) would harden the human-specific premium.

The limit. Already 68 with near-max embodiment and trust; the only real headroom is liability_shield, and even full state licensure of coaches would leave the modal high-school coach cheap, part-time, and volunteer-adjacent — which caps how much any credential regime is actually enforced. The scouting half can keep eroding regardless of anything listed here.

These are conditions, not forecasts — what would have to happen, not what will. Specific rules, cases and bills are named so you can go and check whether they exist and where they stand; verify before relying on any of them. Nothing here is legal or financial advice.

Where this work is, and what it pays there

BLS metro figures for 346 areas. The verdict above does not change by city — the rubric judges what the work involves, not where it happens — but pay and headcount do, and the national median hides a very wide range.

Most of these jobs

New York-Newark-Jersey City, NY-NJ 10,930 $66,110 +40%
Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim, CA 10,850 $47,450 +0%
Chicago-Naperville-Elgin, IL-IN 6,780 $50,350 +6%
Seattle-Tacoma-Bellevue, WA 5,630 $49,640 +5%
San Francisco-Oakland-Fremont, CA 5,380 $54,770 +16%
Boston-Cambridge-Newton, MA-NH 4,840 $56,220 +19%
Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington, TX 4,560 $37,320 -21%
Miami-Fort Lauderdale-West Palm Beach, FL 4,560 $46,710 -1%

Best paid

Corvallis, OR 120 $81,290 +72%
Trenton-Princeton, NJ 350 $74,620 +58%
Atlantic City-Hammonton, NJ 90 $74,000 +56%

Percentages are against this occupation's national median of $47,320. Counts are jobs in that metro, not vacancies. Metros where the BLS suppressed the cell are absent rather than shown as zero.

Who is actually doing this — nobody, on the record

We have no reported case of a named organisation automating this occupation. Not one deployment, not one announcement.

That is worth saying out loud next to a score of 68. The verdict above is about what the work exposes — what current AI could do to these tasks. It is not a claim that anyone has done it. For this occupation those two things have come apart completely: the capability argument is on this page, and the evidence column is empty.

Read that as a gap in the reporting we can see, not proof of absence — the dispatch runs on English-language feeds and misses plenty. If you know of a case, tell us, or add a field report from inside the job.

Quick take — do you do this job?

Has AI actually changed your work? One tap, anonymous, and the running tally is public. Nothing else is asked of you.

Self-reported and unverified — a sentiment signal, not a survey. One response per person per occupation; you can change your answer.

Field reports — what people say has changed

No field reports yet. A written account takes a paragraph rather than a tap, goes to an editor before it appears, and is the one thing on this page the rubric cannot produce on its own.

File a field report

Concrete beats general: a tool that arrived, a task that moved, a headcount decision you watched happen. Don't include anything that identifies you or your employer if that would put you at risk.

Watch this verdict
Kept current

Rather than check back: get the digest and we'll tell you what changed — or watch a single occupation from its own page.