← Risk register SOC 47-2081 · reviewed 2026-08-11

Drywall and Ceiling Tile Installers

83,080 US workers · median $58,930/yr · Construction

EXPOSED

Hanging 12-foot sheets on uneven studs, scribing around ducts and outlets, and finishing joints in occupied or half-built rooms is exactly the work robotics handles worst: variable dimensions, overhead lifting, dust, ladders, and constant improvisation. AI touches only the paperwork edges — takeoffs, sheet-count estimating, scheduling, bid letters. There is no license requirement in most states, so the moat is physical and reputational rather than regulatory; the wage pressure here comes from labor supply and crew subcontracting, not from software.

10-year outlook: Ten years out the tools change more than the job — lift assists, laser layout, and AI estimating — while the hanging and finishing itself still needs a person on a stilt.

US employment, 2019–2025-19.2%
102,85083,080 workers

Most of this decline happened after 2021 — it is not the pandemic dip.

Median pay $45,700 → $58,930 +3.2% in real terms (nominal +28.9%, less ~25% US inflation over the period)

The job count is not the verdict

This line is counted by the Bureau of Labor Statistics — the one figure on this page that isn't a judgement of ours. Headcount moves on demand, offshoring, demographics and the business cycle, and automation is one term among several, often not the loudest.

So a falling line is not evidence that AI did it, and a rising one is not evidence that it won't. Both happen in this register: some occupations resist automation and shrink anyway, others are highly automatable and keep growing. The marked year is 2020.

BLS projection, 2024–2034

+4.2%

Percentage only. The projection counts a different population from the 83,080 above — it includes self-employed workers, which for this occupation is most of them, so the two headcounts are not comparable.

Growing, and only partly exposed

The BLS expects +4.2% more of these jobs by 2034, and at 64/100 the work is only partly exposed — some tasks are automatable, the core of the job is not. Nothing here is in tension.

Different clocks. The score is what current AI could do to this work today. The projection is how many of these jobs will exist in 2034. Everything between the two — how fast employers actually adopt, whether demand grows in the meantime — is why they can point opposite ways without either being wrong.

~7,700 openings a year on average, including replacing people who leave.

One email if this score changes. Watch as many occupations as you like from the same address — no account, and nothing is sent on a schedule, only when a verdict actually moves.

Also known as — 24 job titles this covers

Titles reported by people doing this work, from the US Department of Labor's O*NET survey. If your job title is here, this page is about your work even though the name doesn't match.

FurrerLatherDrywallerLath HandRemodelerRock LatherWire LatherWood LatherMetal FramerMetal FurrerMetal LatherSheet RockerDrywall TaperDrywall HangerDrywall SanderDrywall WorkerPlaster LatherDrywall CarrierDrywall FinisherDrywall MechanicDrywall StripperRockboard LatherSheet Rock LayerCeiling Installer

Score — 64/100 resistance

Holding it up: embodiment (20/20). Weakest point: liability shield (4/20).

Five dimensions, 0–20 each, summed. Higher means more protected. The arithmetic is shown so you can check it: 18 + 20 + 4 + 8 + 14 = 64. · Scored 2026-08-11, and re-examined when evidence accumulates rather than on a schedule.

Task resistance 18/20

Tasks largely resist digitisation Cutting a sheet to fit a stairwell soffit where no two studs are 16 inches apart, back-blocking a butt joint, and feathering a three-coat finish that reads flat under raking window light are judged by hand and eye at arm's length — the only parts a machine reliably takes are panel-lift assist and laser layout, which crews already use without shrinking headcount.

Embodiment 20/20

Hands-on in uncontrolled environments You are on stilts or a Baker scaffold carrying 54-pound 5/8-inch Type X overhead, screwing off ceilings before walls, breathing joint-compound dust in unconditioned shells with temporary power and no finished floor — there is no version of this performed remotely.

Liability shield 4/20

No licence, no signature requirement No state licenses drywall hanging as a trade; the general contractor or the fire-stopping inspector signs off on the rated assembly, and your exposure is limited to OSHA fall-protection and silica rules on the crew, not a personal credential anyone can pull.

Trust premium 8/20

Some relationship component Repeat work comes from the GC or builder who knows your crew hits schedule and leaves finishes that don't need a re-skim, which is worth real money on the next bid — but homeowners rarely learn your name, and on production tract work the panel goes out to whoever is cheapest that month.

Judgment & accountability 14/20

Exists to be accountable for ambiguous calls Deciding whether framing is out-of-plumb enough to shim or demand the framer return, where to float a ceiling to hide a truss uplift, and how to break sheets so seams miss high-traffic sightlines are calls made on the spot with the schedule running.

This verdict was revised after a second scoring. Two independent runs of the same rubric returned 71/100 and 59/100. The score above is their average, and the change of label held whichever way the rounding went — so it reflects the two runs genuinely disagreeing with the first published number, not a rounding artefact.

Confidence: high · reviewed 2026-08-11 · how scoring works

What this job involves — and which parts are yours

The verdict above describes this occupation as a whole. Almost nobody does the typical version of a job — tick what's actually in your week and see how your own mix sits.

AI already does these at usable quality

These still need a person

Active moats on the surviving side: embodiment, physical-presence, judgment

How to future-proof this job

Training paths for your skill gaps: Apprenticeship.gov — electrical, HVAC, plumbing and fitting programs that pay while you learn paid to train · Apprenticeship.gov — paid, employer-sponsored trade apprenticeships, searchable by trade and ZIP paid to train · MIT OpenCourseWare — circuits, systems and diagnostic method, free and ungated free · Apprenticeship.gov — industrial maintenance and millwright programs paid to train

All 35 skills ranked by how many jobs they open →

Where this experience transfers — occupations you could move toward

Computed from U.S. Dept. of Labor O*NET skill and knowledge profiles: high overlap with what you already do, a materially higher resistance score, no large jump in required training, and no licence you would have to start a new pipeline to get. Targets that pay meaningfully less, that are themselves COOKED, or whose own headcount is falling are excluded — a move into a shrinking trade is not an escape.

Plumbers, Pipefitters, and Steamfitters SAFE · 86/100 · you already have ~56% of the skill profile

Skills to close: Installation, Repairing, Troubleshooting, Equipment Maintenance

What would move this back up — beyond any one person

The moves above are yours to make. This is the other half: what would have to change in the world for the occupation itself to score higher. None of it is in any one person's gift, but it is where the floor actually comes from. Scores here are not a one-way ratchet. Only two of the five dimensions — task resistance and embodiment — track what machines can do. The other three track law, what buyers will pay for, and who is answerable, and those move in both directions, often in response to the same pressure AI creates. If every lever below landed, this occupation would score around 79/100 — SAFE.

4 specific changes that would raise this score
  • already happening liability shield +3

    Silica and lift-related enforcement pushing crews toward licensed/registered contractor status: OSHA 1926.1153 Table 1 silica compliance plus state contractor-registration bills (e.g. residential specialty licensing in WA/OR/CA C-9 drywall license) create a named licensee who signs for compliance. Wider adoption of a C-9-style specialty license across states would add a real, if thin, credential moat.

  • plausible liability shield +5

    Fire-rated and smoke-barrier assembly work becoming a licensed/certified specialty: some jurisdictions already require third-party firestop special inspection (IBC 1705.17, ASTM E2174/E2393) and FM 4991-approved contractor status for penetration firestopping. If a state or model code extended a named, personally-accountable installer certification to rated wall and shaft-liner assemblies — signed installation records per opening — the shield rises from near-nil.

  • plausible trust premium +4

    Level 5 finish and historic/plaster restoration work priced as a named-craftsman line item: architects specifying GA-214 Level 5 with skim coat on high-light-angle walls, or SHPO-eligible plaster repair on tax-credit rehab projects, already buys a specific finisher's hand. Growth of that specification tier — versus commodity Level 4 tract work — raises the premium.

  • plausible judgment accountability +3

    Task-mix shift as panel-lifting and rough-hang assist tools (semi-autonomous board lifts, Canvas-style finishing robots on flat commercial planes) take the repetitive flat-field work, leaving scribing, rated-assembly detailing, deflection joints, and remediation calls. The remaining job is the diagnosis tier: judging whether a substrate is acceptable, when to refuse a framer's out-of-tolerance wall, how to detail a moving joint.

The limit. Embodiment and task_resistance are already at or near maximum; there is no headroom there and any movement is downward as jobsite robotics mature on flat commercial work. The realistic ceiling for this occupation is roughly 72-75, driven almost entirely by rated-assembly certification and the Level 5/restoration finish tier. Neither reaches the bulk of residential tract hangers, whose exposure is to labor supply and subcontracting economics, not software — no lever here touches that.

These are conditions, not forecasts — what would have to happen, not what will. Specific rules, cases and bills are named so you can go and check whether they exist and where they stand; verify before relying on any of them. Nothing here is legal or financial advice.

Revision history

Every change to this verdict since we started logging. Moves inside the measured noise band — three points or less — are not recorded, because re-scoring the same occupation drifts that much on its own and logging it would bury the real movements.

  1. 2026-08-12 SAFE → EXPOSED 71 → 64/100

    Adjudication: scored twice independently and the runs disagreed. The change held under every rounding method, so the average was published.

Where this work is, and what it pays there

BLS metro figures for 169 areas. The verdict above does not change by city — the rubric judges what the work involves, not where it happens — but pay and headcount do, and the national median hides a very wide range.

Most of these jobs

Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim, CA 7,710 $62,800 +7%
Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, CA 3,640 $61,420 +4%
San Diego-Chula Vista-Carlsbad, CA 3,220 $76,290 +29%
New York-Newark-Jersey City, NY-NJ 2,560 $71,320 +21%
San Francisco-Oakland-Fremont, CA 2,510 $82,160 +39%
Sacramento-Roseville-Folsom, CA 2,500 $63,540 +8%
Las Vegas-Henderson-North Las Vegas, NV 2,340 $52,280 -11%
Washington-Arlington-Alexandria, DC-VA-MD-WV 2,210 $59,070 +0%

Best paid

Urban Honolulu, HI 710 $105,910 +80%
Napa, CA 50 $84,410 +43%
Kahului-Wailuku, HI 60 $83,190 +41%

Percentages are against this occupation's national median of $58,930. Counts are jobs in that metro, not vacancies. Metros where the BLS suppressed the cell are absent rather than shown as zero.

Who is actually doing this — nobody, on the record

We have no reported case of a named organisation automating this occupation. Not one deployment, not one announcement.

That is worth saying out loud next to a score of 64. The verdict above is about what the work exposes — what current AI could do to these tasks. It is not a claim that anyone has done it. For this occupation those two things have come apart completely: the capability argument is on this page, and the evidence column is empty.

Read that as a gap in the reporting we can see, not proof of absence — the dispatch runs on English-language feeds and misses plenty. If you know of a case, tell us, or add a field report from inside the job.

Quick take — do you do this job?

Has AI actually changed your work? One tap, anonymous, and the running tally is public. Nothing else is asked of you.

Self-reported and unverified — a sentiment signal, not a survey. One response per person per occupation; you can change your answer.

Field reports — what people say has changed

No field reports yet. A written account takes a paragraph rather than a tap, goes to an editor before it appears, and is the one thing on this page the rubric cannot produce on its own.

File a field report

Concrete beats general: a tool that arrived, a task that moved, a headcount decision you watched happen. Don't include anything that identifies you or your employer if that would put you at risk.

Watch this verdict
Kept current

Rather than check back: get the digest and we'll tell you what changed — or watch a single occupation from its own page.