← Risk register SOC 17-3023 · reviewed 2026-08-11

Electrical and Electronic Engineering Technologists and Technicians

95,130 US workers · median $78,190/yr · Engineering

EXPOSED

The modal technician splits time between screen work — drafting schematics and PCB layouts in CAD, writing test scripts, logging and charting instrument data, producing test reports — and bench work: building prototypes, soldering rework, wiring test fixtures, running oscilloscopes and spectrum analyzers, calibrating equipment, and troubleshooting boards that fail for reasons no datasheet predicted. AI is already eating the documentation, data-reduction, and routine layout-checking half, but nobody has a robot that can probe a misbehaving board, spot a cold joint, or improvise a test rig. There is no license requirement here; the PE stamp belongs to the engineer, which removes the regulatory shield that protects licensed trades.

10-year outlook: Documentation-and-drafting-heavy technician roles thin out over the next decade while bench-debug, calibration, and field-commissioning positions hold or grow with domestic electronics and grid buildout.

US employment, 2019–2025-22.4%
122,55095,130 workers

This fall is concentrated in 2020 and has not recovered since.

Median pay $65,260 → $78,190 -4.1% in real terms (nominal +19.8%, less ~25% US inflation over the period)

The job count is not the verdict

This line is counted by the Bureau of Labor Statistics — the one figure on this page that isn't a judgement of ours. Headcount moves on demand, offshoring, demographics and the business cycle, and automation is one term among several, often not the loudest.

So a falling line is not evidence that AI did it, and a rising one is not evidence that it won't. Both happen in this register: some occupations resist automation and shrink anyway, others are highly automatable and keep growing. The marked year is 2020.

BLS projection, 2024–2034

+0.6% 93,700 → 94,300 on the projections basis

Exposed, but growing

AI can already do a lot of these tasks, and the BLS still expects +0.6% more of these jobs by 2034. Demand for the output is growing faster than the work is being automated away — the mechanism BLS gives for software developers, and the combination people most often misread as an error.

Different clocks. The score is what current AI could do to this work today. The projection is how many of these jobs will exist in 2034. Everything between the two — how fast employers actually adopt, whether demand grows in the meantime — is why they can point opposite ways without either being wrong.

~8,400 openings a year on average, including replacing people who leave.

One email if this score changes. Watch as many occupations as you like from the same address — no account, and nothing is sent on a schedule, only when a verdict actually moves.

Also known as — 24 job titles this covers

Titles reported by people doing this work, from the US Department of Labor's O*NET survey. If your job title is here, this page is about your work even though the name doesn't match.

PrototyperTechnicianRelay TesterTechnologistParts DesignerTube RebuilderLayout DesignerTest SpecialistTest TechnicianCircuit DesignerLaser TechnicianLight TechnicianLighting AdviserDesign TechnicianControl SpecialistControl TechnicianResults TechnicianSystems TechnicianAnalysis SpecialistDemand TechnologistDesign TechnologistDrafting TechnicianInstrument MechanicInstrument Repairer

Score — 45/100 resistance

Holding it up: embodiment (14/20). Weakest point: liability shield (4/20).

Five dimensions, 0–20 each, summed. Higher means more protected. The arithmetic is shown so you can check it: 11 + 14 + 4 + 6 + 10 = 45. · Scored 2026-08-11, and re-examined when evidence accumulates rather than on a schedule.

Task resistance 11/20

Mixed — a routine tier and a judgment tier An 11 reflects that roughly half the week — DRC-clean layout passes, netlist checks, LabVIEW/Python test-script scaffolding, and turning captured waveform CSVs into report figures — is already automatable or nearly so, while the other half (bringing up a board that won't boot, chasing intermittent EMI, jigging a fixture for a part that has no eval board) still needs a person at the bench, which keeps it out of the 0-6 band but well short of resistant.

Embodiment 14/20

Hands-on in uncontrolled environments 14 lands just into hands-on because the work is physical in ways a screen can't cover — hot-air rework on 0402s and BGAs, hand-probing live boards, terminating harnesses, running loopback and continuity checks in test cells, hauling a scope to a plant floor or antenna range for field measurements — but it's mostly a bench or lab you control, not a utility pole in weather, which is what separates it from an 18.

Liability shield 4/20

No licence, no signature requirement 4 because nothing about this job requires a state license: the PE seal on the drawing set and the sign-off on the safety-critical design belong to the engineer, and while an ETA/ISCET cert or IPC-A-610/J-STD-001 solder qualification may be asked for on the resume or by a customer contract, no statute makes you personally answerable for a failed board.

Trust premium 6/20

Some relationship component 6 sits at the floor of relationship-bearing work: the design engineers who keep requesting you by name because you know which supplier's connectors fail and where the last three revisions bit them is real value, but the deliverable is a test report, a build, and a red-lined schematic that another competent technician could have produced, and the customer of record rarely knows your name.

Judgment & accountability 10/20

Meaningful discretion 10 is discretion inside a bounded frame — you decide the probe points, whether a marginal reading is instrument noise or a real fault, whether to pass or reject a unit against spec, and what to escalate — but the acceptance criteria, tolerance limits, and test plan come down from engineering, and the call to ship or redesign is not yours.

Confidence: medium · reviewed 2026-08-11 · how scoring works

What this job involves — and which parts are yours

The verdict above describes this occupation as a whole. Almost nobody does the typical version of a job — tick what's actually in your week and see how your own mix sits.

AI already does these at usable quality

These still need a person

Active moats on the surviving side: embodiment, judgment

How to future-proof this job

Training paths for your skill gaps: Apprenticeship.gov — electrical, HVAC, plumbing and fitting programs that pay while you learn paid to train · Khan Academy — physics, chemistry and biology from the ground up free · OSHA Outreach Training — the 10- and 30-hour cards most employers ask for low · edX — operations management and process monitoring courses free to audit · Apprenticeship.gov — industrial maintenance and millwright programs paid to train · Coursera — quality control and inspection courses, auditable free free to audit

All 35 skills ranked by how many jobs they open →

Where this experience transfers — occupations you could move toward

Computed from U.S. Dept. of Labor O*NET skill and knowledge profiles: high overlap with what you already do, a materially higher resistance score, no large jump in required training, and no licence you would have to start a new pipeline to get. Targets that pay meaningfully less, that are themselves COOKED, or whose own headcount is falling are excluded — a move into a shrinking trade is not an escape.

Electro-Mechanical and Mechatronics Technologists and Technicians EXPOSED · 55/100 · you already have ~88% of the skill profile

Skills to close: Installation, Science, Operation and Control, Operations Monitoring

Avionics Technicians SAFE · 71/100 · you already have ~87% of the skill profile

Skills to close: Science, Equipment Maintenance, Quality Control Analysis, Installation

Electrical and Electronics Repairers, Commercial and Industrial Equipment SAFE · 67/100 · you already have ~85% of the skill profile

Skills to close: Science, Installation, Operations Monitoring, Quality Control Analysis

What would move this back up — beyond any one person

The moves above are yours to make. This is the other half: what would have to change in the world for the occupation itself to score higher. None of it is in any one person's gift, but it is where the floor actually comes from. Scores here are not a one-way ratchet. Only two of the five dimensions — task resistance and embodiment — track what machines can do. The other three track law, what buyers will pay for, and who is answerable, and those move in both directions, often in response to the same pressure AI creates. If every lever below landed, this occupation would score around 61/100, still EXPOSED.

4 specific changes that would raise this score
  • already happening task resistance +4

    Task-mix shift: the CAD-checking, test-report writing, and data-reduction tier is genuinely automatable, and when it goes the residual job is hardware bring-up debug — probing intermittent faults, EMI/signal-integrity chasing, improvising fixtures. This is a real two-tier occupation, and the surviving tier is the one no toolchain touches.

  • already happening embodiment +3

    Shift of employment toward field/depot work rather than lab bench: aerospace and defense sustainment, utility substation relay testing, semiconductor fab tool support, where the environment is uncontrolled and the board is inside a machine that cannot be moved. Already visible as US fab and defense buildout (CHIPS-funded sites, submarine industrial base) pulls technicians into on-site roles.

  • plausible liability shield +5

    Not a PE route, but certification-based signing authority: NETA/InterNational Electrical Testing Association ANSI/NETA ATS acceptance-testing requires certified technicians to sign test reports, and NFPA 70B (now a standard, 2023) plus NFPA 70E arc-flash studies push owners and insurers to demand a named certified technician's signature on electrical test and calibration records. If insurers or state electrical codes make NETA/NICET certification mandatory for acceptance and maintenance test sign-off, personal accountability attaches where none exists now. Similarly ISO 17025 calibration records require a named authorized signatory.

  • plausible judgment accountability +4

    Ownership of test-evidence integrity under DO-160/DO-254, IEC 61508 SIL verification, or FDA design-verification protocols, where the technician who executed the test attests that the article and setup matched the protocol and is the named witness in an audit. Growth of functional-safety and cybersecurity-certification regimes (EU Cyber Resilience Act, UL 2900) expands the number of consequential attestation calls a technician personally owns.

The limit. There is no realistic trust_premium route: buyers are firms procuring verified hardware, not consumers choosing a human, and nobody pays extra for a human-soldered prototype. The strongest levers here are certification-based sign-off and physical field work, not license capture — an unlicensed occupation adjacent to a licensed one (PE) rarely acquires its own stamp.

These are conditions, not forecasts — what would have to happen, not what will. Specific rules, cases and bills are named so you can go and check whether they exist and where they stand; verify before relying on any of them. Nothing here is legal or financial advice.

Where this work is, and what it pays there

BLS metro figures for 245 areas. The verdict above does not change by city — the rubric judges what the work involves, not where it happens — but pay and headcount do, and the national median hides a very wide range.

Most of these jobs

Boston-Cambridge-Newton, MA-NH 3,290 $78,190 +0%
Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim, CA 3,230 $81,940 +5%
New York-Newark-Jersey City, NY-NJ 2,960 $82,000 +5%
San Jose-Sunnyvale-Santa Clara, CA 2,880 $95,280 +22%
Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington, TX 2,720 $75,580 -3%
Washington-Arlington-Alexandria, DC-VA-MD-WV 2,590 $84,090 +8%
Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands, TX 2,200 $69,410 -11%
San Diego-Chula Vista-Carlsbad, CA 1,980 $91,620 +17%

Best paid

Bremerton-Silverdale-Port Orchard, WA 250 $106,250 +36%
Atlantic City-Hammonton, NJ 50 $103,480 +32%
Bakersfield-Delano, CA 540 $103,170 +32%

Percentages are against this occupation's national median of $78,190. Counts are jobs in that metro, not vacancies. Metros where the BLS suppressed the cell are absent rather than shown as zero.

Who is actually doing this — nobody, on the record

We have no reported case of a named organisation automating this occupation. Not one deployment, not one announcement.

That is worth saying out loud next to a score of 45. The verdict above is about what the work exposes — what current AI could do to these tasks. It is not a claim that anyone has done it. For this occupation those two things have come apart completely: the capability argument is on this page, and the evidence column is empty.

Read that as a gap in the reporting we can see, not proof of absence — the dispatch runs on English-language feeds and misses plenty. If you know of a case, tell us, or add a field report from inside the job.

Quick take — do you do this job?

Has AI actually changed your work? One tap, anonymous, and the running tally is public. Nothing else is asked of you.

Self-reported and unverified — a sentiment signal, not a survey. One response per person per occupation; you can change your answer.

Field reports — what people say has changed

No field reports yet. A written account takes a paragraph rather than a tap, goes to an editor before it appears, and is the one thing on this page the rubric cannot produce on its own.

File a field report

Concrete beats general: a tool that arrived, a task that moved, a headcount decision you watched happen. Don't include anything that identifies you or your employer if that would put you at risk.

Watch this verdict
Kept current

Rather than check back: get the digest and we'll tell you what changed — or watch a single occupation from its own page.