← Risk register SOC 49-2096 · reviewed 2026-08-11

Electronic Equipment Installers and Repairers, Motor Vehicles

8,550 US workers · median $48,420/yr · Trades

EXPOSED

The core of this job — pulling door panels and dashboards, running wire looms through firewalls, fabricating amp racks and speaker baffles, splicing into vehicle harnesses, and chasing ground loops and alternator whine in a specific car — is manual work in a cramped, non-standard physical space that no robot performs. What AI erodes is the surrounding layer: wiring-diagram lookup, system design and load calculations, quoting, and troubleshooting scripts that used to take experience to accumulate. There is no license and no signature requirement, so the moat is purely physical skill and the shop's reputation, not regulation.

10-year outlook: Employment stays small and flat as factory infotainment absorbs aftermarket audio demand, but the technicians who handle modern vehicle electrical integration and fabrication keep steady, well-paid work.

US employment, 2019–2025-17.1%
10,3108,550 workers

This fall is concentrated in 2020 and has not recovered since.

Median pay $37,380 → $48,420 +3.6% in real terms (nominal +29.5%, less ~25% US inflation over the period)

The job count is not the verdict

This line is counted by the Bureau of Labor Statistics — the one figure on this page that isn't a judgement of ours. Headcount moves on demand, offshoring, demographics and the business cycle, and automation is one term among several, often not the loudest.

So a falling line is not evidence that AI did it, and a rising one is not evidence that it won't. Both happen in this register: some occupations resist automation and shrink anyway, others are highly automatable and keep growing. The marked year is 2020.

BLS projection, 2024–2034

-13.6%

Percentage only. The projection counts a different population from the 8,550 above — it includes self-employed workers, which for this occupation is most of them, so the two headcounts are not comparable.

Shrinking, but not obviously because of AI

The BLS projects -13.6% by 2034, but at 51/100 this work is only moderately exposed — not the profile of a job current AI can simply do. Occupations shrink for many reasons, and the score does not point at automation as this one's cause.

Different clocks. The score is what current AI could do to this work today. The projection is how many of these jobs will exist in 2034. Everything between the two — how fast employers actually adopt, whether demand grows in the meantime — is why they can point opposite ways without either being wrong.

~600 openings a year on average, including replacing people who leave.

One email if this score changes. Watch as many occupations as you like from the same address — no account, and nothing is sent on a schedule, only when a verdict actually moves.

Also known as — 24 job titles this covers

Titles reported by people doing this work, from the US Department of Labor's O*NET survey. If your job title is here, this page is about your work even though the name doesn't match.

WirerInstallerGenerator ManGenerator WorkerAccessory InstallerAppliance InstallerAuto Radio MechanicCar Alarm InstallerCar Audio InstallerEquipment InstallerGenerator RebuilderTape Deck InstallerAuto Phone InstallerCar Stereo InstallerAutomotive TechnicianCustom Home InstallerElectronic TechnicianElectronics InstallerBurglar Alarm InstallerInstallation SpecialistInstallation TechnicianElectrical Tryout PersonCar Electronics InstallerSecurity System Installer

Score — 51/100 resistance

Holding it up: embodiment (17/20). Weakest point: liability shield (3/20).

Five dimensions, 0–20 each, summed. Higher means more protected. The arithmetic is shown so you can check it: 15 + 17 + 3 + 8 + 8 = 51. · Scored 2026-08-11, and re-examined when evidence accumulates rather than on a schedule.

Task resistance 15/20

Tasks largely resist digitisation Fishing a wire loom behind a 2019 Ram's A-pillar, cutting a baffle to fit a door that was never designed for a 6x9, and pinning a T-harness into a factory connector without breaking the retaining tab are tasks defined by the specific vehicle in front of you, which keeps this at 15 rather than 18 — the diagnostic reasoning around them (which wire is the reverse trigger, why the head unit resets on cranking) is increasingly answered by a model reading the same service data you would.

Embodiment 17/20

Hands-on in uncontrolled environments You work upside down in a footwell with a trim tool in your teeth, on someone else's vehicle, in a bay with variable lighting and no fixed workpiece geometry — 17 rather than 20 only because the car is at least stationary and indoors, unlike a lineman or a roofer.

Liability shield 3/20

No licence, no signature requirement No state licenses 12-volt installers; the 3 reflects that MECP certification is a resume line customers rarely ask about, and when an aftermarket remote start bricks a BCM the argument is with the shop's warranty and the vehicle manufacturer, not with a board that can pull your ticket.

Trust premium 8/20

Some relationship component An 8 is where repeat business matters — the tuner who brings you every build, the dealer that subs out its accessory work — but the retail customer who found you for a backup camera install compares your quote to two other shops and never learns your name.

Judgment & accountability 8/20

Meaningful discretion Deciding to run a second ground to the chassis instead of daisy-chaining, or refusing to tap a CAN-bus circuit on a late-model that will throw codes, is discretion with real money behind it, but it sits at 8 because most calls are bounded by the install manual, the amp's current draw, and what the customer already paid for.

Confidence: medium · reviewed 2026-08-11 · how scoring works

What this job involves — and which parts are yours

The verdict above describes this occupation as a whole. Almost nobody does the typical version of a job — tick what's actually in your week and see how your own mix sits.

AI already does these at usable quality

These still need a person

Active moats on the surviving side: embodiment, physical-presence

How to future-proof this job

Training paths for your skill gaps: edX — systems thinking and evaluation methods free to audit · MIT OpenCourseWare — systems analysis and engineering free · Apprenticeship.gov — industrial maintenance and millwright programs paid to train · Khan Academy — mathematics, arithmetic through calculus free · Apprenticeship.gov — paid, employer-sponsored trade apprenticeships, searchable by trade and ZIP paid to train

All 35 skills ranked by how many jobs they open →

Where this experience transfers — occupations you could move toward

Computed from U.S. Dept. of Labor O*NET skill and knowledge profiles: high overlap with what you already do, a materially higher resistance score, no large jump in required training, and no licence you would have to start a new pipeline to get. Targets that pay meaningfully less, that are themselves COOKED, or whose own headcount is falling are excluded — a move into a shrinking trade is not an escape.

Automotive Service Technicians and Mechanics SAFE · 67/100 · you already have ~86% of the skill profile

Skills to close: Systems Evaluation, Systems Analysis

Medical Equipment Repairers EXPOSED · 64/100 · you already have ~85% of the skill profile

Skills to close: Equipment Maintenance, Mathematics, Repairing, Systems Analysis

Motorcycle Mechanics SAFE · 68/100 · you already have ~81% of the skill profile

What would move this back up — beyond any one person

The moves above are yours to make. This is the other half: what would have to change in the world for the occupation itself to score higher. None of it is in any one person's gift, but it is where the floor actually comes from. Scores here are not a one-way ratchet. Only two of the five dimensions — task resistance and embodiment — track what machines can do. The other three track law, what buyers will pay for, and who is answerable, and those move in both directions, often in response to the same pressure AI creates. If every lever below landed, this occupation would score around 68/100 — SAFE.

5 specific changes that would raise this score
  • already happening judgment accountability +4

    As CAN-bus and gateway architectures make any splice a potential source of intermittent faults in braking or driver-monitoring systems, the consequential call becomes 'will this install compromise a safety network' — an ambiguity call the shop owns and can be sued over, rather than a wiring task. Visible now in OEM aftermarket-modification voiding language and in insurers denying claims on modified vehicles

  • already happening liability shield +3

    EV high-voltage work: if state occupational rules or insurer conditions require documented HV-qualified personnel (NFPA 70E-style / OEM HV disable-and-verify procedures) for any work behind the HV interlock, installers cutting into EV harnesses need a credentialed sign-off

  • already happening task resistance +3

    Genuine two-tier split: if AI absorbs diagram lookup, load calc, quoting, and scripted diagnosis, the residual job is undocumented-fault work — chasing intermittent ground loops, gateway rejection of aftermarket modules, and vehicles whose harness has been previously butchered, where no diagram exists to consult

  • plausible liability shield +5

    ADAS recalibration and safety-system integrity: if state inspection or insurer repair-standard rules (following the pattern of Washington's and Minnesota's OEM-repair-procedure statutes, and I-CAR/OEM position statements requiring documented static/dynamic recalibration after windshield, camera, or radar disturbance) require a named, certified technician to sign a recalibration and pre-scan/post-scan record before a vehicle with ADAS is returned to service, aftermarket electronics work that touches cameras, radar sensors, or CAN bus falls under a signed attestation regime

  • plausible trust premium +2

    Narrow route only: high-end and classic/restoration audio and 12-volt work where buyers pay for a named fabricator's craftsmanship (SEMA/MECA competition circuit, restomod builders). Does not extend to the volume remote-start and backup-camera trade

The limit. Realistic ceiling is low-to-mid 60s. There is no path to a general license for 12-volt installers; the credible gains all come from ADAS/EV safety-system adjacency, which raises the score for technicians who move into that work and leaves the plain audio-and-alarm installer where they are. Trust premium stays thin because most demand is price-shopped through dealers and big-box installers.

These are conditions, not forecasts — what would have to happen, not what will. Specific rules, cases and bills are named so you can go and check whether they exist and where they stand; verify before relying on any of them. Nothing here is legal or financial advice.

Where this work is, and what it pays there

BLS metro figures for 29 areas. The verdict above does not change by city — the rubric judges what the work involves, not where it happens — but pay and headcount do, and the national median hides a very wide range.

Most of these jobs

Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington, TX 390 $52,180 +8%
New York-Newark-Jersey City, NY-NJ 370 $54,930 +13%
Elkhart-Goshen, IN 260 $58,890 +22%
Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands, TX 230 $49,850 +3%
Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington, MN-WI 210 $49,740 +3%
Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, CA 200 $44,110 -9%
Miami-Fort Lauderdale-West Palm Beach, FL 150 $46,400 -4%
San Francisco-Oakland-Fremont, CA 150 $57,310 +18%

Best paid

Urban Honolulu, HI 60 $68,480 +41%
Louisville/Jefferson County, KY-IN 40 $60,900 +26%
Salem, OR 60 $59,970 +24%

Percentages are against this occupation's national median of $48,420. Counts are jobs in that metro, not vacancies. Metros where the BLS suppressed the cell are absent rather than shown as zero.

Who is actually doing this — nobody, on the record

We have no reported case of a named organisation automating this occupation. Not one deployment, not one announcement.

That is worth saying out loud next to a score of 51. The verdict above is about what the work exposes — what current AI could do to these tasks. It is not a claim that anyone has done it. For this occupation those two things have come apart completely: the capability argument is on this page, and the evidence column is empty.

Read that as a gap in the reporting we can see, not proof of absence — the dispatch runs on English-language feeds and misses plenty. If you know of a case, tell us, or add a field report from inside the job.

Quick take — do you do this job?

Has AI actually changed your work? One tap, anonymous, and the running tally is public. Nothing else is asked of you.

Self-reported and unverified — a sentiment signal, not a survey. One response per person per occupation; you can change your answer.

Field reports — what people say has changed

No field reports yet. A written account takes a paragraph rather than a tap, goes to an editor before it appears, and is the one thing on this page the rubric cannot produce on its own.

File a field report

Concrete beats general: a tool that arrived, a task that moved, a headcount decision you watched happen. Don't include anything that identifies you or your employer if that would put you at risk.

Watch this verdict
Kept current

Rather than check back: get the digest and we'll tell you what changed — or watch a single occupation from its own page.