← Risk register SOC 27-4032 · reviewed 2026-08-11

Film and Video Editors

25,610 US workers · median $75,420/yr · Media

COOKED

Editing is entirely screen-based, and the volume tiers of the work — logging footage, syncing audio, transcript-driven rough cuts, captioning, reframing for vertical, basic color and audio cleanup, cutting 40 social variants from one master — are already handled well by Premiere/Resolve AI features and text-based editors. What survives is narrative judgment: pacing a scene so it lands emotionally, structuring a documentary from 200 hours of unscripted material, and sitting in a room with a director or client absorbing vague notes and turning them into a cut. The modal editor today does more corporate, social, and promo work than feature narrative, and that modal work is exactly the part collapsing in price.

10-year outlook: Total editor headcount shrinks as one senior editor plus AI absorbs the volume work; the survivors are story-structure editors and post supervisors with direct client trust.

Score — 32/100 resistance

Five dimensions, 0–20 each, summed. Higher means more protected. The arithmetic is shown so you can check it: 9 + 4 + 1 + 8 + 10 = 32.

Task resistance 9/20

Mixed — a routine tier and a judgment tier. A 9 sits mid-band because the assembly layer — ingest, multicam sync, transcript-based stringouts, subtitle burn-in, 9:16 reframes, loudness normalization to -14 LUFS — is now a menu command, while structuring a 45-minute unscripted episode from mismatched interview coverage and finding the one reaction shot that makes a beat work still requires someone watching every frame and deciding what it means.

Embodiment 4/20

Fully desk- and screen-based. A 4, not 0, only because you still physically handle drives, LTO pulls, and reference monitors in a calibrated suite and occasionally sit on set for on-location assembly — but nothing in the job requires leaving a desk with a keyboard, tablet, and two displays.

Liability shield 1/20

No licence, no signature requirement. There is no licence, no board, and no exam for editing; the E&O policy and the delivery contract sit with the producer or post house, so a botched cut costs you the next gig, not your right to practice.

Trust premium 8/20

Some relationship component. An 8 reflects that directors and showrunners rehire the specific editor who already knows their taste and can read "it feels flat around the middle" — but on branded, corporate, and social work you're a line item on a rate card, replaced between projects without a conversation.

Judgment & accountability 10/20

Meaningful discretion. A 10 covers the real discretion in pacing, structure, and what a documentary subject's on-camera contradiction is allowed to imply — but the director, showrunner, or client approves the cut before it ships, so the ambiguous high-stakes call is theirs to sign off on.

Scored twice. An independent second run returned 31/100 — COOKED, agreeing with the verdict above.

This score sits on a verdict boundary. At 32/100 it is one point from EXPOSED. Re-scoring moves results by a point or two, so here the score is more informative than the label.

Confidence: high · reviewed 2026-08-11 · how scoring works

Tasks already automatable

What survives

Active moats: trust, judgment

How to future-proof this job

Field report — do you do this job?

Has AI actually changed your work?

Self-reported and unverified — a sentiment signal, not a survey. One response per person per occupation; you can change your answer.

From people who do this job

Nobody has filed one yet. If you do this work, you know things the rubric can't see.

What has actually changed in your work?

Concrete beats general: a tool that arrived, a task that moved, a headcount decision you watched happen. Don't include anything that identifies you or your employer if that would put you at risk.