← Risk register SOC 51-3093 · reviewed 2026-08-11

Food Cooking Machine Operators and Tenders

31,250 US workers · median $41,590/yr · Production

EXPOSED

The core loop — load product, set time/temperature, watch gauges, pull batches, log readings, clean the equipment — is physical work in a food plant, which shields it from language AI but not from the PLC-and-sensor automation that has been eating these lines for decades. Recipe adherence, batch logging, and process-parameter monitoring are already handled by control systems on modern lines; what keeps a human on the floor is unjamming conveyors, hand-loading awkward product, sanitation, and catching an off-color or off-texture batch. There is no license, no signature, and no customer relationship to defend the role.

10-year outlook: Headcount keeps shrinking as plants consolidate onto automated cook lines, and the jobs that remain shift from tending to setting up, cleaning, and repairing the machines.

Score — 35/100 resistance

Five dimensions, 0–20 each, summed. Higher means more protected. The arithmetic is shown so you can check it: 11 + 14 + 2 + 3 + 5 = 35.

Task resistance 11/20

Mixed — a routine tier and a judgment tier. Setting fryer or retort time-and-temperature, holding a hold-tube at 161°F, and logging CCP readings are already PLC-and-recorder functions on any line built this century, but hand-loading irregular product into baskets, clearing a jammed conveyor mid-cook, breaking down and sanitizing a kettle, and eyeballing a batch that came out pale or mushy keep enough of the shift unautomated to hold this at 11 rather than down in the single digits.

Embodiment 14/20

Hands-on in uncontrolled environments. The shift is spent on a wet, hot plant floor moving 40-pound baskets and totes, reaching into steam-jacketed kettles and fryers, hosing down and reassembling equipment on sanitation, and working around live steam, hot oil, and moving belts — uncontrolled enough to sit at 14, short of 18 because it is one fixed plant with guarded machines rather than an unpredictable outdoor or client site.

Liability shield 2/20

No licence, no signature requirement. No state license, no board, no personal signature: the plant's HACCP plan and the PCQI or QA manager who wrote it carry the food-safety accountability, and a food-handler card plus in-house line training is the whole credential wall, which is why this lands at 2 rather than 0-only-because-you-initial-the-cook-log.

Trust premium 3/20

Anonymous artifact production. Product leaves in a sealed package with a lot code and no name attached, and the only relationships that matter are with the line lead and the sanitation crew on your own shift — worth a 3 because supervisors do retain the operators who know a particular retort's quirks, not because any customer asks for you.

Judgment & accountability 5/20

Executes defined procedures on defined inputs. Cook parameters come from a written recipe and the HACCP critical limits, deviations go to QA or the supervisor rather than being resolved on the floor, and the discretion you actually own — call this batch off-texture, stop the line for a jam, adjust for a slightly wetter incoming lot — is real but bounded, putting it at 5 rather than in the procedural-only 0-2 range.

Confidence: medium · reviewed 2026-08-11 · how scoring works

Tasks already automatable

What survives

Active moats: embodiment, physical-presence

How to future-proof this job

Escape hatches — adjacent fields with better verdicts

Computed from U.S. Dept. of Labor O*NET skill profiles: high overlap with what you already do, materially higher resistance score.

Bakers EXPOSED · 50/100 · you already have ~74% of the skill profile

Skills to close: Service Orientation

Cooks, Restaurant EXPOSED · 57/100 · you already have ~72% of the skill profile

Butchers and Meat Cutters EXPOSED · 51/100 · you already have ~65% of the skill profile

Skills to close: Service Orientation, Negotiation, Persuasion, Instructing

Field report — do you do this job?

Has AI actually changed your work?

Self-reported and unverified — a sentiment signal, not a survey. One response per person per occupation; you can change your answer.

From people who do this job

Nobody has filed one yet. If you do this work, you know things the rubric can't see.

What has actually changed in your work?

Concrete beats general: a tool that arrived, a task that moved, a headcount decision you watched happen. Don't include anything that identifies you or your employer if that would put you at risk.