← Risk register SOC 23-2011 · reviewed 2026-08-11

Paralegals and Legal Assistants

392,880 US workers · median $62,890/yr · Legal

COOKED

The bulk of the modal paralegal's day — document review and coding, drafting discovery responses and routine motions, cite-checking, deposition summaries, records requests, and case-file organization — is exactly the text work large language models now do at usable quality and at a fraction of the billable cost. What resists is the physical and procedural layer: filing in courts with idiosyncratic clerks, chasing witnesses and records custodians, managing exhibits at trial, and knowing which judge's chambers wants what. Critically, paralegals carry no license and sign nothing — the supervising attorney owns the liability, so there is no regulatory floor under this job the way there is for nurses or CPAs.

10-year outlook: Expect headcount to shrink and the role to bifurcate: high-volume document-review paralegals get squeezed hard, while procedural specialists, e-discovery operators, and client-facing case managers absorb the surviving work at higher pay.

Score — 33/100 resistance

Five dimensions, 0–20 each, summed. Higher means more protected. The arithmetic is shown so you can check it: 8 + 5 + 4 + 7 + 9 = 33.

Task resistance 8/20

Mixed — a routine tier and a judgment tier. An 8 rather than a 4 reflects that first-pass document review, privilege coding, deposition digests, and boilerplate discovery drafting are already being handed to review platforms and LLMs, while calendaring against local rules, e-filing through CM/ECF and state portals with clerks who reject for margin violations, trial-exhibit prep, and running down a records custodian who won't answer email still require a person tracking a live docket.

Embodiment 5/20

Some physical or field component. A 5 puts this just above pure desk work: the job is overwhelmingly screen-based, but there are runs to the courthouse for hand-filings and certified copies, banker's boxes and exhibit binders to assemble, trial-bag duty during a two-week jury trial, and client signature-gathering — physical tasks that occupy days, not hours, and never leave controlled indoor settings.

Liability shield 4/20

No licence, no signature requirement. A 4 because there is no paralegal licence in any US jurisdiction, NALA's CP and NFPA's RP are voluntary and rarely required to be hired, and the unauthorized-practice-of-law statutes cut against you — you cannot give legal advice, sign pleadings, or appear, so malpractice exposure and Rule 5.3 supervisory duty sit entirely with the attorney whose name is on the filing.

Trust premium 7/20

Some relationship component. A 7 recognizes that long-tenured paralegals do become the person the client calls about their case status and the one the partner trusts with the messy file, but the engagement letter, the fee, and the relationship of record belong to the attorney, and clients switch firms without asking who the paralegal was.

Judgment & accountability 9/20

Meaningful discretion. A 9 covers real discretion — deciding what's responsive versus privileged in a first pass, flagging a limitations date, judging which of 40,000 documents the associate actually needs — exercised inside a structure where every consequential call is reviewed and signed by someone else before it leaves the building.

Scored twice. An independent second run returned 30/100 — COOKED, agreeing with the verdict above.

This score sits on a verdict boundary. At 33/100 it is one point from EXPOSED. Re-scoring moves results by a point or two, so here the score is more informative than the label.

Confidence: high · reviewed 2026-08-11 · how scoring works · 5 deployment reports on file

Tasks already automatable

What survives

Active moats: trust, judgment

How to future-proof this job

Training paths for your skill gaps: Systems analysis & design partner link · Structured problem solving partner link

Escape hatches — adjacent fields with better verdicts

Computed from U.S. Dept. of Labor O*NET skill profiles: high overlap with what you already do, materially higher resistance score.

Private Detectives and Investigators EXPOSED · 56/100 · you already have ~70% of the skill profile

Skills to close: Operation and Control, Management of Material Resources, Systems Analysis, Complex Problem Solving

Who is actually doing this

The score above is about what the work exposes. This is reporting about real deployments in this occupation — the difference between "could be automated" and "somebody automated it."

Mike Morse Law Firm · Morgan & Morgan · McCann FitzGerald · Dentons

Field report — do you do this job?

Has AI actually changed your work?

Self-reported and unverified — a sentiment signal, not a survey. One response per person per occupation; you can change your answer.

From people who do this job

Nobody has filed one yet. If you do this work, you know things the rubric can't see.

What has actually changed in your work?

Concrete beats general: a tool that arrived, a task that moved, a headcount decision you watched happen. Don't include anything that identifies you or your employer if that would put you at risk.