← Risk register SOC 39-9032 · reviewed 2026-08-11

Recreation Workers

331,490 US workers · median $36,560/yr · Personal Care

EXPOSED

The core of this job — leading a game of kickball, running a summer camp group, supervising a pool deck, coaxing a shy nine-year-old into the craft circle, calming a dispute between teenagers — is physical, social, and improvisational, and nothing in current AI or robotics touches it. What AI does absorb is the paperwork layer: activity schedules, program flyers, registration processing, attendance and incident write-ups, grant blurbs and parent newsletters. The real threats to this occupation are municipal and nonprofit budget cycles and low wages, not automation; the modal worker here is a part-time camp or community-center leader, not a program director.

10-year outlook: Ten years out the job still exists in gyms, pools, camps, and senior centers largely unchanged in substance, with the clipboard-and-flyer half of the week compressed — the pressure on headcount will come from public budgets, not from software.

US employment, 2019–2025-7.6%
358,750331,490 workers

Nearly all of this fall was the 2020 shock. It has been climbing back since.

Median pay $26,350 → $36,560 +11.0% in real terms (nominal +38.7%, less ~25% US inflation over the period)

The job count is not the verdict

This line is counted by the Bureau of Labor Statistics — the one figure on this page that isn't a judgement of ours. Headcount moves on demand, offshoring, demographics and the business cycle, and automation is one term among several, often not the loudest.

So a falling line is not evidence that AI did it, and a rising one is not evidence that it won't. Both happen in this register: some occupations resist automation and shrink anyway, others are highly automatable and keep growing. The marked year is 2020.

BLS projection, 2024–2034

+4.1% 327,700 → 341,100 on the projections basis

Growing, and only partly exposed

The BLS expects +4.1% more of these jobs by 2034, and at 64/100 the work is only partly exposed — some tasks are automatable, the core of the job is not. Nothing here is in tension.

Different clocks. The score is what current AI could do to this work today. The projection is how many of these jobs will exist in 2034. Everything between the two — how fast employers actually adopt, whether demand grows in the meantime — is why they can point opposite ways without either being wrong.

~68,100 openings a year on average, including replacing people who leave.

One email if this score changes. Watch as many occupations as you like from the same address — no account, and nothing is sent on a schedule, only when a verdict actually moves.

Also known as — 24 job titles this covers

Titles reported by people doing this work, from the US Department of Labor's O*NET survey. If your job title is here, this page is about your work even though the name doesn't match.

Field ScoutPlay LeaderCamp AdvisorYouth WorkerActivity AideCamp DirectorField AdvisorGuest AdvisorCamp CounselorFitness WorkerTeen CounselorActivities AideActivity LeaderGuest AssociateRecreation AideSocial DirectorSummer CounselorActivities LeaderActivity DirectorPlayground WorkerRecreation LeaderRecreation WorkerRecreational AideActivity Assistant

Score — 64/100 resistance

Holding it up: embodiment (18/20). Weakest point: liability shield (5/20).

Five dimensions, 0–20 each, summed. Higher means more protected. The arithmetic is shown so you can check it: 16 + 18 + 5 + 14 + 11 = 64. · Scored 2026-08-11, and re-examined when evidence accumulates rather than on a schedule.

Task resistance 16/20

Tasks largely resist digitisation Counting heads on a field trip, spotting a kid who's about to bolt, physically demonstrating a soccer drill, and re-directing forty campers when rain kills the outdoor plan are tasks with no digital substitute — only the scheduling grid, sign-in sheets and the monthly program calendar move to software, which is why this sits at 16 and not 19.

Embodiment 18/20

Hands-on in uncontrolled environments The work happens on pool decks, gym floors, wooded trail sites, ice rinks and school cafeterias, with lifting of equipment, standing for a full shift and direct physical supervision of children in spaces you don't control — an 18 rather than 20 only because a share of the hours are indoor rec-center rooms.

Liability shield 5/20

Certification preferred, not legally required Most positions require nothing beyond CPR/first aid and a background check; CPRP certification and lifeguard or aquatics credentials exist and matter for some postings, but the agency or camp operator carries the negligence exposure, not you personally, so this lands at 5 rather than double digits.

Trust premium 14/20

The human relationship is the product Parents re-enroll their kid because you specifically remembered their child's name and their meltdown last summer, and regulars at the senior center show up for the person running bingo — but the funding decision is made by a parks department that treats staff as interchangeable seasonal hires, which caps this at 14.

Judgment & accountability 11/20

Meaningful discretion You decide in real time whether a scraped knee needs a call home, whether a fight gets a warning or an ejection, and when heat or lightning ends the session — genuine discretion, but bounded by written camp policy, mandated-reporter rules and a supervisor you can radio, which puts it at 11 rather than the mid-teens.

This verdict was revised after a second scoring. Two independent runs of the same rubric returned 67/100 and 60/100. The score above is their average, and the change of label held whichever way the rounding went — so it reflects the two runs genuinely disagreeing with the first published number, not a rounding artefact.

Confidence: high · reviewed 2026-08-11 · how scoring works

What this job involves — and which parts are yours

The verdict above describes this occupation as a whole. Almost nobody does the typical version of a job — tick what's actually in your week and see how your own mix sits.

AI already does these at usable quality

These still need a person

Active moats on the surviving side: embodiment, physical-presence, trust

How to future-proof this job

Training paths for your skill gaps: Learning How to Learn — the most-taken course on Coursera, and free free to audit · Khan Academy — reading and vocabulary, all levels, free free · Coursera — decision making under uncertainty free to audit · Coursera — work planning and personal productivity free to audit · Coursera — critical thinking and logic, audit free free to audit · Purdue OWL — the standard reference for professional writing free · MIT OpenCourseWare — full course materials across every department, free free

All 35 skills ranked by how many jobs they open →

Where this experience transfers — occupations you could move toward

Computed from U.S. Dept. of Labor O*NET skill and knowledge profiles: high overlap with what you already do, a materially higher resistance score, no large jump in required training, and no licence you would have to start a new pipeline to get. Targets that pay meaningfully less, that are themselves COOKED, or whose own headcount is falling are excluded — a move into a shrinking trade is not an escape.

Kindergarten Teachers, Except Special Education SAFE · 75/100 · you already have ~75% of the skill profile

Skills to close: Learning Strategies, Reading Comprehension, Judgment and Decision Making, Time Management

Special Education Teachers, Preschool SAFE · 82/100 · you already have ~70% of the skill profile

Skills to close: Reading Comprehension, Critical Thinking, Learning Strategies, Writing

Special Education Teachers, Middle School SAFE · 76/100 · you already have ~70% of the skill profile

Skills to close: Active Learning, Learning Strategies, Reading Comprehension, Writing

What would move this back up — beyond any one person

The moves above are yours to make. This is the other half: what would have to change in the world for the occupation itself to score higher. None of it is in any one person's gift, but it is where the floor actually comes from. Scores here are not a one-way ratchet. Only two of the five dimensions — task resistance and embodiment — track what machines can do. The other three track law, what buyers will pay for, and who is answerable, and those move in both directions, often in response to the same pressure AI creates. If every lever below landed, this occupation would score around 76/100 — SAFE.

4 specific changes that would raise this score
  • already happening liability shield +4

    State child-care and camp licensing rules that make a named, background-checked, certified adult personally responsible for supervision ratios — e.g. states adopting ACA accreditation or the American Camp Association standards into licensure, or expanding mandatory Red Cross Lifeguard/CPR certification and mandated-reporter liability to all youth program staff. Post-abuse-scandal statutes (Child Victims Act-style windows) and insurer requirements that camps document a certified supervisor present per group push this from a weak credential to a personal-liability signature.

  • already happening task resistance +2

    If scheduling, registration, flyers, incident write-ups and grant blurbs are fully absorbed by municipal software, the residual day is almost entirely live supervision and improvisation — but this occupation's routine tier is thin, so the shift is small and it comes with fewer paid hours rather than a better job.

  • plausible judgment accountability +3

    Formalizing the safety and behavioral-crisis role: written protocols where the on-site recreation leader owns the call to close a pool, evacuate for lightning, remove a child, or file a suspected-abuse report — mandated-reporter training laws now extending to youth-serving nonprofits make those calls attributable and consequential rather than informal.

  • plausible trust premium +3

    Parents already choose programs by who the counselor is; a visible route upward is therapeutic recreation, where CTRS certification (NCTRC) is required for reimbursement in hospitals, VA facilities, and CMS-surveyed nursing homes — if state Medicaid or CMS conditions activity-program payment on credentialed human staffing, the paid-for-a-human premium hardens for that segment.

The limit. Scores here are already near their capability ceiling; the binding threat is municipal and nonprofit budget contraction plus part-time wage structure, which no dimension on this register measures. Liability and credential gains would raise the score without raising pay or hours.

These are conditions, not forecasts — what would have to happen, not what will. Specific rules, cases and bills are named so you can go and check whether they exist and where they stand; verify before relying on any of them. Nothing here is legal or financial advice.

Revision history

Every change to this verdict since we started logging. Moves inside the measured noise band — three points or less — are not recorded, because re-scoring the same occupation drifts that much on its own and logging it would bury the real movements.

  1. 2026-08-12 SAFE → EXPOSED 67 → 64/100

    Adjudication: scored twice independently and the runs disagreed. The change held under every rounding method, so the average was published.

Where this work is, and what it pays there

BLS metro figures for 384 areas. The verdict above does not change by city — the rubric judges what the work involves, not where it happens — but pay and headcount do, and the national median hides a very wide range.

Most of these jobs

New York-Newark-Jersey City, NY-NJ 21,900 $38,440 +5%
Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim, CA 17,850 $38,790 +6%
Chicago-Naperville-Elgin, IL-IN 13,670 $35,830 -2%
Phoenix-Mesa-Chandler, AZ 9,200 $36,190 -1%
Boston-Cambridge-Newton, MA-NH 8,720 $38,770 +6%
San Francisco-Oakland-Fremont, CA 6,510 $46,290 +27%
Miami-Fort Lauderdale-West Palm Beach, FL 5,610 $35,460 -3%
Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington, TX 5,160 $32,720 -11%

Best paid

Fairbanks-College, AK 50 $61,040 +67%
San Jose-Sunnyvale-Santa Clara, CA 2,620 $57,580 +57%
College Station-Bryan, TX 1,170 $47,870 +31%

Percentages are against this occupation's national median of $36,560. Counts are jobs in that metro, not vacancies. Metros where the BLS suppressed the cell are absent rather than shown as zero.

Who is actually doing this — nobody, on the record

We have no reported case of a named organisation automating this occupation. Not one deployment, not one announcement.

That is worth saying out loud next to a score of 64. The verdict above is about what the work exposes — what current AI could do to these tasks. It is not a claim that anyone has done it. For this occupation those two things have come apart completely: the capability argument is on this page, and the evidence column is empty.

Read that as a gap in the reporting we can see, not proof of absence — the dispatch runs on English-language feeds and misses plenty. If you know of a case, tell us, or add a field report from inside the job.

Quick take — do you do this job?

Has AI actually changed your work? One tap, anonymous, and the running tally is public. Nothing else is asked of you.

Self-reported and unverified — a sentiment signal, not a survey. One response per person per occupation; you can change your answer.

Field reports — what people say has changed

No field reports yet. A written account takes a paragraph rather than a tap, goes to an editor before it appears, and is the one thing on this page the rubric cannot produce on its own.

File a field report

Concrete beats general: a tool that arrived, a task that moved, a headcount decision you watched happen. Don't include anything that identifies you or your employer if that would put you at risk.

Watch this verdict
Kept current

Rather than check back: get the digest and we'll tell you what changed — or watch a single occupation from its own page.