← Risk register SOC 25-9044 · reviewed 2026-08-11

Teaching Assistants, Postsecondary

164,090 US workers · median $42,910/yr · Education

EXPOSED

The modal postsecondary TA is a graduate student who grades problem sets and essays, writes feedback, holds office hours, answers course-forum questions, and runs discussion or lab sections. Grading, rubric application, feedback drafting, and 24/7 Q&A are exactly what LLM course assistants now do at usable quality and near-zero marginal cost, and universities are deploying them explicitly to cut grading load. What survives is the embodied part: standing in a lab or seminar room, reading confusion on faces, proctoring, and running hands-on demonstrations — plus the fact that TA lines exist partly as graduate funding, which insulates headcount from pure efficiency logic.

10-year outlook: TA headcount will drift down as AI graders and course assistants absorb grading and Q&A, but sections, labs, and grad-funding politics keep a smaller, more instruction-facing version of the role alive through the 2030s.

Score — 36/100 resistance

Five dimensions, 0–20 each, summed. Higher means more protected. The arithmetic is shown so you can check it: 8 + 10 + 1 + 11 + 6 = 36.

Task resistance 8/20

Mixed — a routine tier and a judgment tier. Rubric-based grading of problem sets, drafting written feedback, and answering repeat forum questions are already being handed to LLM graders in large lecture courses, and what holds this at 8 rather than 4 is the live discussion section, wet-lab or studio supervision, and proctoring that still requires a body in a room at a fixed hour.

Embodiment 10/20

Some physical or field component. A 10 fits the split day: office hours and grading happen at a laptop anywhere, but running a chemistry or biology lab section means handling reagents and equipment, enforcing PPE, and physically walking benches — done in a controlled campus space on a fixed timetable, not an uncontrolled field site, which is why it sits mid-scale rather than in the teens.

Liability shield 1/20

No licence, no signature requirement. TAs hold no teaching licence and no credential beyond enrolled-student status; the instructor of record signs the grade roster, owns FERPA compliance and academic-integrity findings, and the lab PI holds the safety authority, so a TA's judgment can be overturned by an email.

Trust premium 11/20

Some relationship component. Students genuinely bond with the TA who explains the proof that finally clicks and writes the recommendation-adjacent recognition, but the appointment turns over every semester or two and rosters get reshuffled, so the relationship rarely outlives the term — an 11 reflects real rapport with no continuity to protect it.

Judgment & accountability 6/20

Executes defined procedures on defined inputs. Grades are set against a rubric and a curve the instructor of record defines, suspected plagiarism gets referred upward rather than adjudicated, and syllabus and accommodation decisions are not the TA's to make; the discretion that exists is pacing a section and deciding how much partial credit an unusual solution earns.

Confidence: medium · reviewed 2026-08-11 · how scoring works

Tasks already automatable

What survives

Active moats: embodiment, trust

How to future-proof this job

Training paths for your skill gaps: Systems analysis & design partner link

Escape hatches — adjacent fields with better verdicts

Computed from U.S. Dept. of Labor O*NET skill profiles: high overlap with what you already do, materially higher resistance score.

Substitute Teachers, Short-Term EXPOSED · 53/100 · you already have ~72% of the skill profile

Skills to close: Persuasion

Adult Basic Education, Adult Secondary Education, and English as a Second Language Instructors EXPOSED · 51/100 · you already have ~69% of the skill profile

Skills to close: Instructing, Systems Analysis, Negotiation, Active Learning

Secondary School Teachers, Except Special and Career/Technical Education SAFE · 69/100 · you already have ~65% of the skill profile

Skills to close: Critical Thinking, Monitoring, Social Perceptiveness, Active Learning

Field report — do you do this job?

Has AI actually changed your work?

Self-reported and unverified — a sentiment signal, not a survey. One response per person per occupation; you can change your answer.

From people who do this job

Nobody has filed one yet. If you do this work, you know things the rubric can't see.

What has actually changed in your work?

Concrete beats general: a tool that arrived, a task that moved, a headcount decision you watched happen. Don't include anything that identifies you or your employer if that would put you at risk.