← Risk register SOC 49-9091 · reviewed 2026-08-11

Coin, Vending, and Amusement Machine Servicers and Repairers

26,410 US workers · median $47,450/yr · Trades

EXPOSED

The core of this job — driving a route, opening machines, replacing bill validators and coin mechs, clearing jams, swapping compressors, restocking and collecting cash — is hands-on work in dozens of uncontrolled locations, which no current robot does. What AI and connected hardware do erode is the diagnostic and logistics layer: telemetry-equipped machines now report their own faults, sales, and stock levels, so route planning, service dispatch, and paperwork increasingly happen without a human deciding. The bigger threat to headcount is cashless payment and remote monitoring shrinking the number of visits per machine, not a machine replacing the technician on site.

10-year outlook: Fewer technicians covering more machines each: remote monitoring kills the routine check-in visit while refrigeration, cashless hardware, and amusement/gaming work keep the skilled tier employed.

Score — 52/100 resistance

Five dimensions, 0–20 each, summed. Higher means more protected. The arithmetic is shown so you can check it: 15 + 17 + 3 + 8 + 9 = 52.

Task resistance 15/20

Tasks largely resist digitisation. Pulling a jammed bill from a validator's transport path, re-timing a coin mech, brazing a leaking refrigerant line in a hallway, and leveling a machine on a warped breakroom floor are tasks no software executes; the 15 rather than 18 reflects that the fault-finding half of your day — figuring out which board or motor failed — is increasingly handed to you by telemetry before you arrive.

Embodiment 17/20

Hands-on in uncontrolled environments. You are in a van most of the day, then kneeling behind machines in arcade back rooms, hospital corridors, and truck-stop vestibules, lifting glass fronts, handling compressors and 30-pound coin bags in whatever heat, cold, or clearance the site gives you — a 17 rather than 20 only because the sites are indoors and you are not on a roof or in a trench.

Liability shield 3/20

No licence, no signature requirement. No state licence gates this trade; the exceptions are narrow — an EPA 608 card to touch refrigerant and, in most states, a gaming licence or registration to service slot and route amusement devices — and neither makes you personally liable for the machine's operation the way a signed inspection would.

Trust premium 8/20

Some relationship component. Route accounts stick with the tech who knows which validator in that plant eats crumpled ones and shows up before the lunch rush, and location owners handing you their cash want a face they recognize — but the vending company holds the contract and the machine, so the relationship transfers when you leave.

Judgment & accountability 9/20

Meaningful discretion. You decide on the spot whether to swap a board, rebuild the mech, or pull the machine, and you reconcile cash discrepancies that can look like theft — real calls, but made against known fault codes, warranty rules, and route sheets rather than genuinely ambiguous stakes.

Confidence: medium · reviewed 2026-08-11 · how scoring works

Tasks already automatable

What survives

Active moats: embodiment, physical-presence

How to future-proof this job

Escape hatches — adjacent fields with better verdicts

Computed from U.S. Dept. of Labor O*NET skill profiles: high overlap with what you already do, materially higher resistance score.

Automotive Service Technicians and Mechanics SAFE · 67/100 · you already have ~76% of the skill profile

Skills to close: Technology Design, Learning Strategies, Installation, Critical Thinking

Farm Equipment Mechanics and Service Technicians SAFE · 67/100 · you already have ~73% of the skill profile

Skills to close: Technology Design, Equipment Maintenance, Learning Strategies, Equipment Selection

Mobile Heavy Equipment Mechanics, Except Engines SAFE · 67/100 · you already have ~71% of the skill profile

Skills to close: Equipment Selection, Mathematics, Technology Design, Instructing

Field report — do you do this job?

Has AI actually changed your work?

Self-reported and unverified — a sentiment signal, not a survey. One response per person per occupation; you can change your answer.

From people who do this job

Nobody has filed one yet. If you do this work, you know things the rubric can't see.

What has actually changed in your work?

Concrete beats general: a tool that arrived, a task that moved, a headcount decision you watched happen. Don't include anything that identifies you or your employer if that would put you at risk.