← Risk register SOC 49-2092 · reviewed 2026-08-11

Electric Motor, Power Tool, and Related Repairers

14,450 US workers · median $56,210/yr · Trades

EXPOSED

The core work — disassembling motors, rewinding armatures and stator coils, replacing bearings and brushes, testing insulation with meggers, balancing rotors, reassembling and bench-testing power tools — is manual dexterity inside grimy, non-standard machines that no robot can handle economically. AI touches only the thin paperwork and diagnostic-lookup layer. The real threat to this occupation isn't AI, it's the replace-rather-than-repair economics of cheap imported motors and tools, which has already shrunk headcount to ~14,000.

10-year outlook: AI will barely touch the bench work, but the occupation keeps shrinking as small motors and tools become disposable — the survivors will be industrial-scale rewind shops and drive/motor field techs tied to plant maintenance contracts.

Score — 60/100 resistance

Five dimensions, 0–20 each, summed. Higher means more protected. The arithmetic is shown so you can check it: 17 + 18 + 4 + 9 + 12 = 60.

Task resistance 17/20

Tasks largely resist digitisation. Stripping burnt varnish off a 40-year-old stator, counting turns on a coil nobody has a winding diagram for, pressing bearings without scoring the shaft, and megger-testing insulation to ground are one-off physical judgments on machines that arrive with no two alike — hence 17 rather than a 20, because the growing share of your day spent on parts lookup, warranty forms, and standard brush/switch swaps on identical cordless tool models is genuinely scriptable.

Embodiment 18/20

Hands-on in uncontrolled environments. You work bent over a bench or on the floor beside a 200 lb frame, hot dip-and-bake tanks, arbor presses, and live 480V test panels, plus field trips to pull a motor off a pump skid in a plant — the only thing keeping this off a 20 is that the majority of the actual rewinding and reassembly happens in your own shop rather than up a tower or in a trench.

Liability shield 4/20

No licence, no signature requirement. No state licenses electric motor repair; you may hold an EASA rebuild qualification or a journeyman electrician card if you also do disconnect-and-reconnect work, and NEMA/UL rules govern the motor, not you — the 4 rather than 0 reflects that hazardous-location (Ex/explosion-proof) motor repair does carry named-shop certification and traceable repair records.

Trust premium 9/20

Some relationship component. Plant maintenance supervisors call the shop that got their critical spare back in 48 hours last time and they know you by name, but the purchase order is written to the business and a competitor with a bigger winding capacity takes the job when you're backed up — 9 reflects repeat account loyalty without you personally being the product.

Judgment & accountability 12/20

Meaningful discretion. You make the rewind-versus-scrap call, decide whether a slight bearing-journal wear means sleeve it or reject the shaft, and choose insulation class and winding configuration when the nameplate is unreadable — real money and a production line ride on it, but a wrong call surfaces on the test stand or within weeks, not as an ambiguous irreversible decision, which is why this sits at 12.

Confidence: high · reviewed 2026-08-11 · how scoring works

Tasks already automatable

What survives

Active moats: embodiment, physical-presence, judgment

How to future-proof this job

Escape hatches — adjacent fields with better verdicts

Computed from U.S. Dept. of Labor O*NET skill profiles: high overlap with what you already do, materially higher resistance score.

Heating, Air Conditioning, and Refrigeration Mechanics and Installers SAFE · 75/100 · you already have ~77% of the skill profile

Skills to close: Management of Personnel Resources

Plumbers, Pipefitters, and Steamfitters SAFE · 86/100 · you already have ~76% of the skill profile

Skills to close: Installation

Electricians SAFE · 80/100 · you already have ~75% of the skill profile

Skills to close: Operations Analysis, Instructing, Management of Financial Resources, Management of Personnel Resources

Field report — do you do this job?

Has AI actually changed your work?

Self-reported and unverified — a sentiment signal, not a survey. One response per person per occupation; you can change your answer.

From people who do this job

Nobody has filed one yet. If you do this work, you know things the rubric can't see.

What has actually changed in your work?

Concrete beats general: a tool that arrived, a task that moved, a headcount decision you watched happen. Don't include anything that identifies you or your employer if that would put you at risk.