← Risk register SOC 51-9194 · reviewed 2026-08-11

Etchers and Engravers

7,750 US workers · median $43,310/yr · Production

COOKED

The modal worker sets up and runs laser, rotary, or chemical etching equipment and prepares artwork files — layout, font selection, vectorizing logos, and proofing are exactly the screen tasks generative design tools and templated e-commerce ordering systems already absorb. What holds is the physical half: fixturing odd-shaped parts, tuning power/speed on unfamiliar substrates, hand-finishing, and reject inspection. A thin artisan tier (hand engraving on firearms, jewelry, trophies with genuine craft reputation) sells the human hand itself, but it is not the national median of this 7,750-person occupation.

10-year outlook: Employment keeps shrinking as online storefronts feed artwork straight to networked laser machines; the survivors are industrial marking technicians and a small, well-known hand-engraving craft tier.

US employment, 2019–2025-24.8%
10,3107,750 workers

Nearly all of this fall was the 2020 shock. It has been climbing back since.

Median pay $30,620 → $43,310 +13.2% in real terms (nominal +41.4%, less ~25% US inflation over the period)

The job count is not the verdict

This line is counted by the Bureau of Labor Statistics — the one figure on this page that isn't a judgement of ours. Headcount moves on demand, offshoring, demographics and the business cycle, and automation is one term among several, often not the loudest.

So a falling line is not evidence that AI did it, and a rising one is not evidence that it won't. Both happen in this register: some occupations resist automation and shrink anyway, others are highly automatable and keep growing. The marked year is 2020.

BLS projection, 2024–2034

-0.7% 8,600 → 8,600 on the projections basis

Exposed, and shrinking

Both signals point the same way: the tasks are largely automatable and the BLS projects -0.7% by 2034. This is the case where the score and the forecast agree, and it is the one worth taking seriously.

Different clocks. The score is what current AI could do to this work today. The projection is how many of these jobs will exist in 2034. Everything between the two — how fast employers actually adopt, whether demand grows in the meantime — is why they can point opposite ways without either being wrong.

~900 openings a year on average, including replacing people who leave.

One email if this score changes. Watch as many occupations as you like from the same address — no account, and nothing is sent on a schedule, only when a verdict actually moves.

Also known as — 24 job titles this covers

Titles reported by people doing this work, from the US Department of Labor's O*NET survey. If your job title is here, this page is about your work even though the name doesn't match.

LinerEtcherJoggerEmbosserEngraverLettererEngrosserProcessorRe-EtcherRetoucherDie CutterHand EtcherPlate MakerSilversmithGlass EtcherLeaf StamperMold StamperPlate CutterSketch MakerWax EngraverHand EngraverLens EngraverMold EngraverSiderographer

Score — 28/100 resistance

Holding it up: embodiment (11/20). Weakest point: liability shield (1/20).

Five dimensions, 0–20 each, summed. Higher means more protected. The arithmetic is shown so you can check it: 7 + 11 + 1 + 5 + 4 = 28. · Scored 2026-08-11, and re-examined when evidence accumulates rather than on a schedule.

Task resistance 7/20

Mixed — a routine tier and a judgment tier A 7 reflects that the file-side half of the day — importing a customer logo, vectorizing it, setting kerning on a nameplate, nesting parts on the bed, running a test coupon — is already handled by templated online ordering and one-click raster/vector conversion, while jig-building for a curved bell or tapered tumbler and judging whether the anneal on stainless came out grey enough to pass still need someone at the machine, which is why it sits above the 0-6 already-automatable band rather than in the mixed middle.

Embodiment 11/20

Some physical or field component 11 comes from work that is hands-on but in your own shop under your own light: clamping and shimming odd-shaped parts, swapping lenses and cleaning optics, pulling parts through masking and etchant baths, running rotary attachments, and hand-buffing or filling with wax — physical and skilled, but not the uncontrolled outdoor or in-service conditions that push a score past 13.

Liability shield 1/20

No licence, no signature requirement 1 is right because no state licences etching or engraving; the only credentials that touch the job are laser-safety and hazmat handling for ferric chloride and nitric baths, and those attach to the employer's OSHA and EPA compliance, not to a personal certificate that a machine cannot legally replace.

Trust premium 5/20

Anonymous artifact production 5 accounts for the trophy shop or plant engraver who has repeat accounts with an awards distributor or an OEM's parts department, but the purchase order specifies part number, text, and depth — the buyer is choosing a spec and a turnaround date, not you, which is why this lands at the top of the anonymous-output band rather than in relationship territory.

Judgment & accountability 4/20

Executes defined procedures on defined inputs 4 fits calls that are real but bounded and reversible on a scrap coupon: power/speed/frequency for an unfamiliar anodized aluminum, whether a mark is deep enough for a UID or serial requirement, whether to scrap a piece with a flare-out — decisions made against sample plates and customer proofs, with the consequence measured in one ruined blank, not the ambiguous high-stakes exposure of the 14-20 band.

Confidence: high · reviewed 2026-08-11 · how scoring works

What this job involves — and which parts are yours

The verdict above describes this occupation as a whole. Almost nobody does the typical version of a job — tick what's actually in your week and see how your own mix sits.

AI already does these at usable quality

These still need a person

Active moats on the surviving side: embodiment

How to future-proof this job

Training paths for your skill gaps: MIT OpenCourseWare — full course materials across every department, free free · edX — operations management and process monitoring courses free to audit · Coursera — customer service and client-facing skill courses free to audit · Apprenticeship.gov — electrical, HVAC, plumbing and fitting programs that pay while you learn paid to train · Khan Academy — physics, chemistry and biology from the ground up free

All 35 skills ranked by how many jobs they open →

Where this experience transfers — occupations you could move toward

Computed from U.S. Dept. of Labor O*NET skill and knowledge profiles: high overlap with what you already do, a materially higher resistance score, no large jump in required training, and no licence you would have to start a new pipeline to get. Targets that pay meaningfully less, that are themselves COOKED, or whose own headcount is falling are excluded — a move into a shrinking trade is not an escape.

Paper Goods Machine Setters, Operators, and Tenders EXPOSED · 38/100 · you already have ~80% of the skill profile

Skills to close: Active Learning, Operations Monitoring

Jewelers and Precious Stone and Metal Workers EXPOSED · 54/100 · you already have ~77% of the skill profile

Skills to close: Service Orientation

Welders, Cutters, Solderers, and Brazers EXPOSED · 62/100 · you already have ~76% of the skill profile

Skills to close: Installation, Science

What would move this back up — beyond any one person

The moves above are yours to make. This is the other half: what would have to change in the world for the occupation itself to score higher. None of it is in any one person's gift, but it is where the floor actually comes from. Scores here are not a one-way ratchet. Only two of the five dimensions — task resistance and embodiment — track what machines can do. The other three track law, what buyers will pay for, and who is answerable, and those move in both directions, often in response to the same pressure AI creates. If every lever below landed, this occupation would score around 38/100 — EXPOSED.

4 specific changes that would raise this score
  • already happening trust premium +3

    Growth of the explicitly hand-cut tier: hand engraving on high-end firearms (FEGA — Firearms Engravers Guild of America certification and show-based commission market), signet rings, and Japanese/Italian bulino work, where the sales pitch is chisel-and-graver provenance and machine-cut work is discounted. If gallery/auction houses and guilds formalize 'hand-engraved' labeling the way hallmarking works, the artisan tier's premium hardens — but this covers a few hundred workers, not the median plate-and-trophy shop

  • already happening task resistance +3

    Task-mix shift as templated e-commerce absorbs layout and proofing: what remains is fixturing irregular parts, first-article setup on unfamiliar substrates (anodized vs. bare titanium, coated glass), power/speed characterization, and reject calls. The occupation genuinely has an ops tier under the file-prep tier; if the file-prep half disappears, the residual day is substrate judgment

  • plausible embodiment +2

    Shift of remaining volume toward serialization and marking of odd geometries — medical implants, aerospace parts, gun receivers — where the part must be jigged and rotated by hand and cannot be sheet-fed. Robotic loading exists for flat stock, not for one-off castings

  • plausible liability shield +2

    Traceability marking rules create a documented-operator requirement rather than a license: FDA UDI direct part marking on implants, and ATF marking depth/legibility standards (0.003 in depth, 1/16 in height) on firearm frames, where a botched or shallow mark on a serialized receiver is a regulatory defect. An AS9100/ISO 13485 audit trail naming the operator who signed off the mark is the realistic version — not personal liability, and not a license

The limit. Even with every lever, this stays in the 30s. There is no licensing body for etchers, no signature requirement, and the median job — plaques, trophies, awards, promotional glass — is exactly the volume that templated online ordering plus a laser absorbs. The artisan and serialization tiers are real but small; a rising register score for this SOC would mostly reflect the low-tier jobs vanishing, not the workers being safer.

These are conditions, not forecasts — what would have to happen, not what will. Specific rules, cases and bills are named so you can go and check whether they exist and where they stand; verify before relying on any of them. Nothing here is legal or financial advice.

Where this work is, and what it pays there

BLS metro figures for 38 areas. The verdict above does not change by city — the rubric judges what the work involves, not where it happens — but pay and headcount do, and the national median hides a very wide range.

Most of these jobs

Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim, CA 500 $45,520 +5%
New York-Newark-Jersey City, NY-NJ 430 $58,020 +34%
Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington, TX 330 —
Chicago-Naperville-Elgin, IL-IN 240 $43,880 +1%
Boston-Cambridge-Newton, MA-NH 230 $50,710 +17%
Portland-Vancouver-Hillsboro, OR-WA 170 $37,780 -13%
San Jose-Sunnyvale-Santa Clara, CA 130 $56,470 +30%
Cincinnati, OH-KY-IN 110 $36,960 -15%

Best paid

New York-Newark-Jersey City, NY-NJ 430 $58,020 +34%
Baltimore-Columbia-Towson, MD 90 $57,770 +33%
San Jose-Sunnyvale-Santa Clara, CA 130 $56,470 +30%

Percentages are against this occupation's national median of $43,310. Counts are jobs in that metro, not vacancies. Metros where the BLS suppressed the cell are absent rather than shown as zero.

Who is actually doing this — nobody, on the record

We have no reported case of a named organisation automating this occupation. Not one deployment, not one announcement.

That is worth saying out loud next to a score of 28. The verdict above is about what the work exposes — what current AI could do to these tasks. It is not a claim that anyone has done it. For this occupation those two things have come apart completely: the capability argument is on this page, and the evidence column is empty.

Read that as a gap in the reporting we can see, not proof of absence — the dispatch runs on English-language feeds and misses plenty. If you know of a case, tell us, or add a field report from inside the job.

Quick take — do you do this job?

Has AI actually changed your work? One tap, anonymous, and the running tally is public. Nothing else is asked of you.

Self-reported and unverified — a sentiment signal, not a survey. One response per person per occupation; you can change your answer.

Field reports — what people say has changed

No field reports yet. A written account takes a paragraph rather than a tap, goes to an editor before it appears, and is the one thing on this page the rubric cannot produce on its own.

File a field report

Concrete beats general: a tool that arrived, a task that moved, a headcount decision you watched happen. Don't include anything that identifies you or your employer if that would put you at risk.

Watch this verdict
Kept current

Rather than check back: get the digest and we'll tell you what changed — or watch a single occupation from its own page.