← Risk register SOC 47-3013 · reviewed 2026-08-11

Helpers--Electricians

63,630 US workers · median $42,670/yr · Construction

EXPOSED

Pulling wire through joists, drilling studs, cutting and bending conduit, hauling material, and cleaning up job sites are physical tasks in cluttered, variable spaces that no current robot handles at cost. The exposure isn't AI doing the work — it's that helpers hold no license, sign nothing, and own no decisions, so their pay and headcount depend entirely on how many licensed electricians the market employs and how much prefab/modular assembly moves labor off-site. This is a stepping-stone title, and the whole value of the job is whether you convert it into a journeyman card.

10-year outlook: The physical work is safe for a decade, but wages stay capped and demand tracks construction cycles unless you convert the helper role into a licensed journeyman ticket.

US employment, 2019–2025-19.7%
79,26063,630 workers

Part 2020 shock, part continued decline in the years since.

Median pay $32,830 → $42,670 +4.0% in real terms (nominal +30.0%, less ~25% US inflation over the period)

The job count is not the verdict

This line is counted by the Bureau of Labor Statistics — the one figure on this page that isn't a judgement of ours. Headcount moves on demand, offshoring, demographics and the business cycle, and automation is one term among several, often not the loudest.

So a falling line is not evidence that AI did it, and a rising one is not evidence that it won't. Both happen in this register: some occupations resist automation and shrink anyway, others are highly automatable and keep growing. The marked year is 2020.

BLS projection, 2024–2034

+0.2% 66,600 → 66,700 on the projections basis

Growing, and only partly exposed

The BLS expects +0.2% more of these jobs by 2034, and at 48/100 the work is only partly exposed — some tasks are automatable, the core of the job is not. Nothing here is in tension.

Different clocks. The score is what current AI could do to this work today. The projection is how many of these jobs will exist in 2034. Everything between the two — how fast employers actually adopt, whether demand grows in the meantime — is why they can point opposite ways without either being wrong.

~6,800 openings a year on average, including replacing people who leave.

One email if this score changes. Watch as many occupations as you like from the same address — no account, and nothing is sent on a schedule, only when a verdict actually moves.

Also known as — 24 job titles this covers

Titles reported by people doing this work, from the US Department of Labor's O*NET survey. If your job title is here, this page is about your work even though the name doesn't match.

HelperApprenticeShop HelperElectrical HelperElectrician HelperHouse Wirer HelperWireman ApprenticeInstallation HelperElectrical AssistantElectrician's HelperTower Erector HelperElectrical ApprenticeElectrician AssistantElectrician ApprenticeElectrician's AssistantStage Electrician HelperInside Wireman ApprenticeMarine Electrician HelperElectrical Sign Wirer HelperProtective Signal Repairer HelperMaterial and Supply Yard AssistantProtective Signal Installer HelperAutomotive Electrician Helper (Auto Electrician Helper)E and I Apprentice (Electrical and Instrumentation Apprentice)

Score — 48/100 resistance

Holding it up: embodiment (18/20). Weakest point: liability shield (4/20).

Five dimensions, 0–20 each, summed. Higher means more protected. The arithmetic is shown so you can check it: 16 + 18 + 4 + 5 + 5 = 48. · Scored 2026-08-11, and re-examined when evidence accumulates rather than on a schedule.

Task resistance 16/20

Tasks largely resist digitisation Fishing wire through a finished ceiling, bending 3/4 EMT around a beam that isn't where the drawing said, and digging trenches for service runs are tasks where every repetition differs by inches and no vision system yet handles the reach-into-a-dark-joist-bay problem at anything like a helper's wage — hence 16, not lower.

Embodiment 18/20

Hands-on in uncontrolled environments You work off ladders and lifts in unconditioned buildings, crawl in attics and crawlspaces, carry 500-foot spools and 10-foot sticks of conduit, and do it around live circuits and other trades' debris — that's uncontrolled site work, and only the small share of shop or prefab-bench time keeps it off 20.

Liability shield 4/20

No licence, no signature requirement No state licenses helpers; you work under a journeyman or master's card, your work is inspected against their name on the permit, and the only credential you might carry is OSHA 10 — which stops nobody from replacing you.

Trust premium 5/20

Anonymous artifact production The foreman who hires you cares whether you show up sober with your own hand tools and remember which color goes where; being known and reliable gets you called back to the next job, but the homeowner never learns your name and the GC signs with the contractor, not you.

Judgment & accountability 5/20

Executes defined procedures on defined inputs You're told where to drill, what gauge to pull, and how high to set the boxes; the discretion left to you is spotting that a stud has a plumbing line behind it or that a cord is frayed and saying so — real, but not a call anyone will hold you to.

Confidence: high · reviewed 2026-08-11 · how scoring works

What this job involves — and which parts are yours

The verdict above describes this occupation as a whole. Almost nobody does the typical version of a job — tick what's actually in your week and see how your own mix sits.

AI already does these at usable quality

These still need a person

Active moats on the surviving side: embodiment, physical-presence

How to future-proof this job

Training paths for your skill gaps: MIT OpenCourseWare — systems analysis and engineering free · edX — systems thinking and evaluation methods free to audit · CS50x, Harvard — how software is actually built free · Coursera — people management and team leadership specialisations free to audit · OSHA Outreach Training — the 10- and 30-hour cards most employers ask for low · Khan Academy — reading and vocabulary, all levels, free free · MIT OpenCourseWare — operations management free · Apprenticeship.gov — electrical, HVAC, plumbing and fitting programs that pay while you learn paid to train

All 35 skills ranked by how many jobs they open →

Where this experience transfers — occupations you could move toward

Computed from U.S. Dept. of Labor O*NET skill and knowledge profiles: high overlap with what you already do, a materially higher resistance score, no large jump in required training, and no licence you would have to start a new pipeline to get. Targets that pay meaningfully less, that are themselves COOKED, or whose own headcount is falling are excluded — a move into a shrinking trade is not an escape.

Solar Photovoltaic Installers EXPOSED · 65/100 · you already have ~86% of the skill profile

Skills to close: Systems Analysis, Systems Evaluation, Technology Design, Management of Personnel Resources

Riggers SAFE · 70/100 · you already have ~83% of the skill profile

Skills to close: Operation and Control, Reading Comprehension, Management of Personnel Resources, Operations Analysis

Plumbers, Pipefitters, and Steamfitters SAFE · 86/100 · you already have ~83% of the skill profile

Skills to close: Installation, Systems Analysis, Systems Evaluation, Technology Design

What would move this back up — beyond any one person

The moves above are yours to make. This is the other half: what would have to change in the world for the occupation itself to score higher. None of it is in any one person's gift, but it is where the floor actually comes from. Scores here are not a one-way ratchet. Only two of the five dimensions — task resistance and embodiment — track what machines can do. The other three track law, what buyers will pay for, and who is answerable, and those move in both directions, often in response to the same pressure AI creates. If every lever below landed, this occupation would score around 60/100, still EXPOSED.

4 specific changes that would raise this score
  • already happening liability shield +5

    State electrical-trainee registration plus enforced apprentice-to-journeyman ratio rules (Washington's 01/02 trainee cards, Oregon's and Wisconsin's ratio statutes) make an unlicensed helper a legally required, countable body on the crew rather than optional labor — a contractor cannot staff up licensed hours without them. Broader adoption or tightened enforcement of ratio rules, plus IRA/CHIPS prevailing-wage rules (Treasury final rule, June 2024) requiring 12.5-15% of total labor hours be performed by registered apprentices on tax-credit-eligible projects, converts helper headcount into a compliance line item.

  • already happening task resistance +2

    Task-mix shift as prefab absorbs the routine tier: new-build repetitive rough-in (identical multifamily units, straight conduit runs, panel assemblies) moves to controlled off-site shops, leaving field helper work concentrated in retrofit, service upgrades, EV-charger and panel-swap work in existing occupied buildings where no two walls are the same. The remaining tier is genuinely less mechanizable than the tier being removed.

  • plausible liability shield +3

    Project Labor Agreements on federal construction over $35M (FAR rule effective Jan 2024) and state/utility-scale solar PLAs that specify registered-apprentice utilization percentages and prohibit substituting unregistered helpers — if these survive litigation and expand to data-center and transmission buildout, apprentice slots become contractually mandated.

  • unlikely judgment accountability +2

    Jurisdictions that let registered trainees perform and initial specific documented steps under indirect rather than direct supervision — e.g., rules permitting a second-year trainee to work unsupervised on limited residential tasks, or utility interconnection paperwork requiring a named installer on record for each EVSE/PV commissioning — attach an identifiable person to a consequential call.

The limit. Trust premium has no realistic route: customers buy the licensed contractor's name and never learn who pulled the wire, and no plausible mechanism makes a homeowner pay extra for a human helper specifically. Also note the liability levers protect the slot, not the person — every one of them is conditioned on the helper being a *registered* apprentice or trainee, so an unregistered helper captures none of the gain. Embodiment is the current floor of this score and prefab pushes it down, not up.

These are conditions, not forecasts — what would have to happen, not what will. Specific rules, cases and bills are named so you can go and check whether they exist and where they stand; verify before relying on any of them. Nothing here is legal or financial advice.

Where this work is, and what it pays there

BLS metro figures for 174 areas. The verdict above does not change by city — the rubric judges what the work involves, not where it happens — but pay and headcount do, and the national median hides a very wide range.

Most of these jobs

New York-Newark-Jersey City, NY-NJ 4,660 $47,800 +12%
Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington, TX 2,200 $44,490 +4%
Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands, TX 1,810 $44,840 +5%
Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Roswell, GA 1,630 $40,220 -6%
Charlotte-Concord-Gastonia, NC-SC 1,500 $42,670 +0%
Nashville-Davidson--Murfreesboro--Franklin, TN 1,330 $46,240 +8%
Washington-Arlington-Alexandria, DC-VA-MD-WV 1,320 $47,470 +11%
San Juan-Bayamon-Caguas, PR 1,280 $26,310 -38%

Best paid

Seattle-Tacoma-Bellevue, WA 350 $76,100 +78%
St. Louis, MO-IL 110 $64,560 +51%
San Francisco-Oakland-Fremont, CA 550 $61,260 +44%

Percentages are against this occupation's national median of $42,670. Counts are jobs in that metro, not vacancies. Metros where the BLS suppressed the cell are absent rather than shown as zero.

Who is actually doing this — nobody, on the record

We have no reported case of a named organisation automating this occupation. Not one deployment, not one announcement.

That is worth saying out loud next to a score of 48. The verdict above is about what the work exposes — what current AI could do to these tasks. It is not a claim that anyone has done it. For this occupation those two things have come apart completely: the capability argument is on this page, and the evidence column is empty.

Read that as a gap in the reporting we can see, not proof of absence — the dispatch runs on English-language feeds and misses plenty. If you know of a case, tell us, or add a field report from inside the job.

Quick take — do you do this job?

Has AI actually changed your work? One tap, anonymous, and the running tally is public. Nothing else is asked of you.

Self-reported and unverified — a sentiment signal, not a survey. One response per person per occupation; you can change your answer.

Field reports — what people say has changed

No field reports yet. A written account takes a paragraph rather than a tap, goes to an editor before it appears, and is the one thing on this page the rubric cannot produce on its own.

File a field report

Concrete beats general: a tool that arrived, a task that moved, a headcount decision you watched happen. Don't include anything that identifies you or your employer if that would put you at risk.

Watch this verdict
Kept current

Rather than check back: get the digest and we'll tell you what changed — or watch a single occupation from its own page.