← Risk register SOC 47-2231 · reviewed 2026-08-11

Solar Photovoltaic Installers

31,350 US workers · median $53,140/yr · Construction

EXPOSED verdict contested

The core of this job — carrying panels up a ladder, lag-bolting rails into rafters you have to find by feel, flashing penetrations so a roof doesn't leak, torquing MC4 connectors, and pulling conduit through an attic in August — is nowhere near robotic reach, and language AI does none of it. What AI does erode is the paperwork layer around the install: shade analysis and array layout, string sizing, permit packages, interconnection applications, and customer proposals are already largely software-generated. Licensure is the soft spot: the modal installer works under a licensed electrician or contractor who signs the permit and owns the liability, so the regulatory shield protects the crew lead and the EC, not every installer.

10-year outlook: Demand, not AI, is the swing factor — the physical work stays human through the 2030s, but tax-credit and policy shifts can move headcount hard, so the installers who add an electrical license and storage/service skills will be the ones still working steadily.

US employment, 2019–2025+182.9%
11,08031,350 workers

Headcount grew steadily across the period.

Median pay $44,890 → $53,140 -5.3% in real terms (nominal +18.4%, less ~25% US inflation over the period)

The job count is not the verdict

This line is counted by the Bureau of Labor Statistics — the one figure on this page that isn't a judgement of ours. Headcount moves on demand, offshoring, demographics and the business cycle, and automation is one term among several, often not the loudest.

So a falling line is not evidence that AI did it, and a rising one is not evidence that it won't. Both happen in this register: some occupations resist automation and shrink anyway, others are highly automatable and keep growing. The marked year is 2020.

BLS projection, 2024–2034

+42.1% 28,600 → 40,600 on the projections basis

Growing, and only partly exposed

The BLS expects +42.1% more of these jobs by 2034, and at 65/100 the work is only partly exposed — some tasks are automatable, the core of the job is not. Nothing here is in tension.

Different clocks. The score is what current AI could do to this work today. The projection is how many of these jobs will exist in 2034. Everything between the two — how fast employers actually adopt, whether demand grows in the meantime — is why they can point opposite ways without either being wrong.

~4,100 openings a year on average, including replacing people who leave.

One email if this score changes. Watch as many occupations as you like from the same address — no account, and nothing is sent on a schedule, only when a verdict actually moves.

Also known as — 24 job titles this covers

Titles reported by people doing this work, from the US Department of Labor's O*NET survey. If your job title is here, this page is about your work even though the name doesn't match.

InstallerSolar DesignerSolar InstallerSolar ElectricianSolar Panel InstallerSolar Power InstallerSolar System InstallerSolar Electric InstallerResidential Solar InstallerSolar Electric PractitionerSolar Energy System InstallerSolar Technician (Solar Tech)PV Installer (Photovoltaic Installer)PV Technician (Photovoltaic Technician)Solar Site Technician (Solar Site Tech)Installation Technician (Installation Tech)Solar Energy Technician (Solar Energy Tech)Solar Service Technician (Solar Service Tech)PV Panel Installer (Photovoltaic Panel Installer)Solar PV Installer (Solar Photovoltaic Installer)Utility Photovoltaic and Energy Storage TechnicianSolar PV Integrator (Solar Photovoltaic Integrator)PV Testing Technician (Photovoltaic Testing Technician)Solar Field Service Technician (Solar Field Service Tech)

Score — 65/100 resistance

Holding it up: embodiment (19/20). Weakest point: liability shield (9/20).

Five dimensions, 0–20 each, summed. Higher means more protected. The arithmetic is shown so you can check it: 17 + 19 + 9 + 10 + 10 = 65. · Scored 2026-08-11, and re-examined when evidence accumulates rather than on a schedule.

Task resistance 17/20

Tasks largely resist digitisation Locating rafters through decking, setting standoffs and flashing them watertight, and terminating DC homeruns in a live combiner box are per-roof judgment-and-hands tasks that no software touches — 17 rather than 20 because the design side (string sizing, layout, shade modeling in Aurora/HelioScope) that installers used to do by hand is now generated before you get to the site.

Embodiment 19/20

Hands-on in uncontrolled environments You work at height on pitched composition or tile roofs, in attics above 130°F, hauling 50-lb modules up ladders in wind, with fall-arrest anchors you install yourself — 19 because the environment is genuinely uncontrolled and varies every address, short of 20 only because ground-mount and carport work is flatter and increasingly crane-assisted.

Liability shield 9/20

Certification preferred, not legally required NABCEP PV Installation Professional is respected but voluntary, and in most states the electrical permit and the AHJ inspection sign-off ride on the licensed electrician or C-46/C-10 contractor, not on the installer torquing the lugs — 9 rather than 4 because a growing number of states require an electrician on the DC side and the crew lead often holds a journeyman card.

Trust premium 10/20

Some relationship component Homeowners meet you on the day of install after the sales rep and designer are gone, so the panel walkthrough, the monitoring app handoff, and the callback for a tripped rapid-shutdown are the only relationship — 10 rather than 15 because the contract, warranty, and financing all belong to the company brand, and a different crew shows up for the service call.

Judgment & accountability 10/20

Meaningful discretion You decide in the field whether a rafter is too split to bolt, whether a roof plane needs re-flashing before racking, and how to reroute conduit when the plan set conflicts with the actual truss layout — 10 rather than 16 because the array design, module count, and inverter selection arrive fixed from engineering and any real deviation goes back for a revised permit.

The verdict on this page is contested. We scored this occupation twice, independently, and the two runs disagreed: 65/100 — EXPOSED and 68/100 — SAFE. Combining them doesn't settle it — the answer changes depending on how the halfway points are rounded, which is a property of our arithmetic and not of the job. Rather than pick the side that suits us, we've left the original verdict in place and flagged it. Read the dimension scores below and the reasoning attached to each; on this page they carry the information, and the one-word label does not.

Confidence: high · reviewed 2026-08-11 · how scoring works · 1 deployment report on file

What this job involves — and which parts are yours

The verdict above describes this occupation as a whole. Almost nobody does the typical version of a job — tick what's actually in your week and see how your own mix sits.

AI already does these at usable quality

These still need a person

Active moats on the surviving side: embodiment, physical-presence, licensure

How to future-proof this job

Training paths for your skill gaps: Purdue OWL — the standard reference for professional writing free · Apprenticeship.gov — paid, employer-sponsored trade apprenticeships, searchable by trade and ZIP paid to train · Apprenticeship.gov — industrial maintenance and millwright programs paid to train · edX — operations management and process monitoring courses free to audit · MIT OpenCourseWare — circuits, systems and diagnostic method, free and ungated free · MIT OpenCourseWare — operations management free

All 35 skills ranked by how many jobs they open →

Where this experience transfers — occupations you could move toward

Computed from U.S. Dept. of Labor O*NET skill and knowledge profiles: high overlap with what you already do, a materially higher resistance score, no large jump in required training, and no licence you would have to start a new pipeline to get. Targets that pay meaningfully less, that are themselves COOKED, or whose own headcount is falling are excluded — a move into a shrinking trade is not an escape.

Plumbers, Pipefitters, and Steamfitters SAFE · 86/100 · you already have ~92% of the skill profile

Skills to close: Writing, Repairing

Heating, Air Conditioning, and Refrigeration Mechanics and Installers SAFE · 75/100 · you already have ~86% of the skill profile

Skills to close: Repairing, Writing, Equipment Maintenance, Operations Monitoring

Electricians SAFE · 80/100 · you already have ~74% of the skill profile

Skills to close: Troubleshooting, Repairing, Operations Analysis, Writing

What would move this back up — beyond any one person

The moves above are yours to make. This is the other half: what would have to change in the world for the occupation itself to score higher. None of it is in any one person's gift, but it is where the floor actually comes from. Scores here are not a one-way ratchet. Only two of the five dimensions — task resistance and embodiment — track what machines can do. The other three track law, what buyers will pay for, and who is answerable, and those move in both directions, often in response to the same pressure AI creates. If every lever below landed, this occupation would score around 78/100 — SAFE.

4 specific changes that would raise this score
  • already happening liability shield +3

    Insurer/warranty-driven credentialing: module and inverter manufacturers, and roof-warranty carriers, voiding coverage unless the penetration and flashing work is done by a certified installer of record who signs off — already partly in motion via roofing manufacturer certified-contractor programs and IRA-era prevailing-wage/apprenticeship bonus credit conditions tied to registered apprenticeship hours

  • already happening task resistance +2

    Task-mix shift as design, string sizing, permitting and proposals fully automate: the remaining paid work concentrates in field diagnosis — locating rafters in non-standard framing, retrofit service calls on aging arrays, battery/main-panel-upgrade integration, and code-driven re-work — which is the judgment tier of an occupation that genuinely has two tiers

  • plausible liability shield +5

    State licensing boards or codes requiring that PV-specific work be performed by a credentialed individual, not merely supervised by an EC — e.g. expansion of state solar contractor licenses (as in Nevada's C-2g classification, Utah's S-202) plus utility interconnection rules or AHJ inspection checklists that require a NABCEP-certified installer on-site and named on the permit, with personal accountability for rapid-shutdown and arc-fault compliance under NEC 690/705

  • plausible judgment accountability +3

    Growth of storage and load-management scope (NEC 705.12/706, service-panel derating decisions, backup-load prioritization) placing consequential fire- and outage-risk calls on the crew lead rather than the desk designer, especially where AHJs accept field-modified plans

The limit. Embodiment and task_resistance are already near ceiling; there is no realistic route to a trust premium — residential buyers shop on price per watt and choose the salesperson's brand, not the installer, and utility-scale procurement is explicitly cost-driven. The real exposure here is not the AI displacing the hands but automated design/permitting collapsing crew hours per install and squeezing headcount.

These are conditions, not forecasts — what would have to happen, not what will. Specific rules, cases and bills are named so you can go and check whether they exist and where they stand; verify before relying on any of them. Nothing here is legal or financial advice.

Where this work is, and what it pays there

BLS metro figures for 44 areas. The verdict above does not change by city — the rubric judges what the work involves, not where it happens — but pay and headcount do, and the national median hides a very wide range.

Most of these jobs

New York-Newark-Jersey City, NY-NJ 2,190 $70,130 +32%
Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim, CA 1,930 $59,600 +12%
San Juan-Bayamon-Caguas, PR 1,700 $26,860 -49%
Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands, TX 1,620 $47,060 -11%
Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington, TX 1,570 $48,350 -9%
Phoenix-Mesa-Chandler, AZ 1,000 $51,200 -4%
Austin-Round Rock-San Marcos, TX 830 $50,580 -5%
Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, CA 790 $60,050 +13%

Best paid

Kahului-Wailuku, HI 40 $78,360 +47%
San Francisco-Oakland-Fremont, CA 710 $72,150 +36%
San Jose-Sunnyvale-Santa Clara, CA 280 $71,630 +35%

Percentages are against this occupation's national median of $53,140. Counts are jobs in that metro, not vacancies. Metros where the BLS suppressed the cell are absent rather than shown as zero.

Who is actually doing this

The score above is about what the work exposes. This is reporting about real deployments in this occupation — the difference between "could be automated" and "somebody automated it."

Rosendin Electric

1 of 1 reported case, with sources

Quick take — do you do this job?

Has AI actually changed your work? One tap, anonymous, and the running tally is public. Nothing else is asked of you.

Self-reported and unverified — a sentiment signal, not a survey. One response per person per occupation; you can change your answer.

Field reports — what people say has changed

No field reports yet. A written account takes a paragraph rather than a tap, goes to an editor before it appears, and is the one thing on this page the rubric cannot produce on its own.

File a field report

Concrete beats general: a tool that arrived, a task that moved, a headcount decision you watched happen. Don't include anything that identifies you or your employer if that would put you at risk.

Watch this verdict
Kept current

Rather than check back: get the digest and we'll tell you what changed — or watch a single occupation from its own page.