← Risk register SOC 51-9061 · reviewed 2026-08-11

Inspectors, Testers, Sorters, Samplers, and Weighers

597,370 US workers · median $48,570/yr · Production

COOKED verdict contested

The core of this job — visual defect checks, dimensional gauging, sorting by grade, weighing, logging results into quality systems — is exactly what machine vision, in-line sensors, and automated gauging already do faster and more consistently, and the factory floor is the most controlled, automation-friendly physical environment that exists. Physical handling of parts and fixtures still needs hands, which is the main thing holding the number up. The surviving tier is narrow: NDT-certified technicians, calibration and metrology specialists, and inspectors who own nonconformance dispositions, supplier audits, and root-cause investigations rather than pass/fail calls.

10-year outlook: Headcount keeps eroding as in-line vision and automated gauging spread through mid-size plants, while a smaller, better-paid core of NDT, metrology, and quality-engineering roles absorbs the judgment work.

Score — 33/100 resistance

Five dimensions, 0–20 each, summed. Higher means more protected. The arithmetic is shown so you can check it: 7 + 11 + 4 + 4 + 7 = 33.

Task resistance 7/20

Mixed — a routine tier and a judgment tier. At 7 rather than 4, the pass/fail visual scan, caliper and micrometer readings, and grade sorting are already being done by in-line cameras and laser gauges on the same lines you work, but first-article layouts, fixturing odd geometries, and chasing an intermittent defect back to a machine still take a person walking the floor — that residue is what keeps it out of the bottom band.

Embodiment 11/20

Some physical or field component. An 11 reflects that you are physically lifting, rotating, and mounting parts, running CMM setups, pulling samples from tanks and totes, and standing at a line all shift — but it happens inside a lit, climate-managed plant with fixed stations and known part families, not on a roof or in a trench, so it stops well short of the uncontrolled-environment band.

Liability shield 4/20

No licence, no signature requirement. A 4 is right because most inspection jobs post as high-school-plus-training with no state licence: your sign-off on an inspection record is countersigned into the QMS and the legal exposure lands on the company's quality manager and PE-stamped drawings, and even ASNT Level II NDT or ASQ CQI credentials are employer- or program-issued preferences, not a personal liability that follows you.

Trust premium 4/20

Anonymous artifact production. At 4, your output is a stamped ticket, a dimensional report, or a lot disposition that the next station consumes without knowing who produced it; the buyer trusts the AS9100 or ISO certificate and the audit trail, not you by name, and shifting inspectors between lines and shifts costs the customer nothing.

Judgment & accountability 7/20

Meaningful discretion. A 7 acknowledges genuine calls — accept-with-deviation, borderline cosmetic defects, when to stop the line, whether a sample is representative — but those decisions are bounded by written specs, control limits, and AQL sampling tables, and anything expensive escalates to an MRB or engineering disposition rather than resting on you.

The verdict on this page is contested. We scored this occupation twice, independently, and the two runs disagreed: 33/100 — COOKED and 36/100 — EXPOSED. Combining them doesn't settle it — the answer changes depending on how the halfway points are rounded, which is a property of our arithmetic and not of the job. Rather than pick the side that suits us, we've left the original verdict in place and flagged it. Read the dimension scores below and the reasoning attached to each; on this page they carry the information, and the one-word label does not.

Confidence: high · reviewed 2026-08-11 · how scoring works

Tasks already automatable

What survives

Active moats: embodiment, judgment

How to future-proof this job

Escape hatches — adjacent fields with better verdicts

Computed from U.S. Dept. of Labor O*NET skill profiles: high overlap with what you already do, materially higher resistance score.

Model Makers, Metal and Plastic EXPOSED · 50/100 · you already have ~74% of the skill profile

Skills to close: Repairing, Equipment Maintenance, Equipment Selection, Troubleshooting

Welders, Cutters, Solderers, and Brazers EXPOSED · 62/100 · you already have ~74% of the skill profile

Skills to close: Installation

Model Makers, Wood EXPOSED · 48/100 · you already have ~72% of the skill profile

Skills to close: Operations Analysis

Field report — do you do this job?

Has AI actually changed your work?

Self-reported and unverified — a sentiment signal, not a survey. One response per person per occupation; you can change your answer.

From people who do this job

Nobody has filed one yet. If you do this work, you know things the rubric can't see.

What has actually changed in your work?

Concrete beats general: a tool that arrived, a task that moved, a headcount decision you watched happen. Don't include anything that identifies you or your employer if that would put you at risk.