← Risk register SOC 49-9045 · reviewed 2026-08-11

Refractory Materials Repairers, Except Brickmasons

1,080 US workers · median $61,290/yr · Trades

EXPOSED

This job is chipping out spalled brick and slag inside cooled furnaces, ladles and kilns, mixing and gunning castable refractory, cutting and fitting shapes in confined, hot, dust-choked spaces — none of it is screen work and none of it is within reach of current robotics. AI can help with mix specs, wear-life records and shutdown scheduling, not with crawling into a ladle. The real threat to this 1,000-person occupation is the contraction of domestic steel, foundry, glass and cement capacity, not language models.

10-year outlook: The physical work stays human through the 2030s; headcount tracks the number of operating furnaces in the US far more than it tracks AI.

Score — 65/100 resistance

Five dimensions, 0–20 each, summed. Higher means more protected. The arithmetic is shown so you can check it: 18 + 20 + 6 + 9 + 12 = 65.

Task resistance 18/20

Tasks largely resist digitisation. How much of the day-to-day work current AI already does at usable quality.

Embodiment 20/20

Hands-on in uncontrolled environments. Physical work in unpredictable environments. Robotics lags language models badly.

Liability shield 6/20

Certification preferred, not legally required. Is a licensed human legally required to sign, and personally liable if it goes wrong?

Trust premium 9/20

Some relationship component. Do buyers specifically pay for a human — presence, care, accountability?

Judgment & accountability 12/20

Meaningful discretion. Does the role own consequential calls made with incomplete information?

This verdict was revised after a second scoring. Two independent runs of the same rubric returned 67/100 and 63/100. The score above is their average, and the change of label held whichever way the rounding went — so it reflects the two runs genuinely disagreeing with the first published number, not a rounding artefact.

Confidence: medium · reviewed 2026-08-11 · how scoring works

Tasks already automatable

What survives

Active moats: embodiment, physical-presence, judgment

How to future-proof this job

Field report — do you do this job?

Has AI actually changed your work?

Self-reported and unverified — a sentiment signal, not a survey. One response per person per occupation; you can change your answer.

From people who do this job

Nobody has filed one yet. If you do this work, you know things the rubric can't see.

What has actually changed in your work?

Concrete beats general: a tool that arrived, a task that moved, a headcount decision you watched happen. Don't include anything that identifies you or your employer if that would put you at risk.