← Risk register SOC 27-3023 · reviewed 2026-08-11

News Analysts, Reporters, and Journalists

39,250 US workers · median $62,200/yr · Media

EXPOSED

The modal worker here is a local or trade reporter whose day mixes original reporting with a large volume of commodity text: rewriting press releases, recapping earnings and game results, summarizing public meetings, aggregating wire copy, and writing SEO headlines — all of which generative models already do at publishable-enough quality for ad-supported outlets. What resists is the part that requires being in the room: cultivating sources who only talk to a person they trust, showing up at the courthouse or the fire, verifying a claim against a document nobody has posted, and personally owning a story that could get the outlet sued. There is no license protecting this work, and the economics of the industry are shrinking headcount independent of AI, which compounds the exposure.

10-year outlook: By the mid-2030s commodity news writing is largely machine-generated and staff counts keep falling, while a smaller tier of source-driven, on-scene, and investigative reporters with their own audiences becomes more valuable per person.

Score — 37/100 resistance

Five dimensions, 0–20 each, summed. Higher means more protected. The arithmetic is shown so you can check it: 7 + 8 + 1 + 10 + 11 = 37.

Task resistance 7/20

Mixed — a routine tier and a judgment tier. A 7 rather than a 12 reflects how much of the week is text-transformation the model already handles — turning a police blotter, an agenda packet, a quarterly filing or an AP feed into 400 publishable words — with only the doorknocking, the off-record coffee, and the FOIA-follow-up sitting above that line.

Embodiment 8/20

Some physical or field component. An 8 covers the real but intermittent physical duty: standing at the school board meeting, driving to the flood, holding a recorder at a scrum, shooting your own phone video — none of it in the uncontrolled or hazardous conditions a war correspondent or storm-chaser faces, and much of the day still filed from a laptop.

Liability shield 1/20

No licence, no signature requirement. A 1, not a 0, because journalism is deliberately unlicensed in the US — the First Amendment forecloses credentialing — so nothing but a press pass anyone can print stands between the job and a competitor, human or otherwise; defamation exposure lands on the publisher, not on you personally.

Trust premium 10/20

Some relationship component. A 10 splits the beat in two: the sources who leak to you specifically because they know you burned nobody before are irreplaceable, but the reader who arrives from a search result or an aggregator has no idea who wrote the story and would not change habits if the byline vanished.

Judgment & accountability 11/20

Meaningful discretion. An 11 is right for calls like whether two sources are enough to publish, whether to name a juvenile, what to withhold in an active manhunt, and where the line sits between allegation and fact — genuine discretion, but exercised inside a style guide and cleared by an editor who takes the final publish decision.

Confidence: high · reviewed 2026-08-11 · how scoring works · 1 deployment report on file

Tasks already automatable

What survives

Active moats: trust, judgment, physical-presence

How to future-proof this job

Training paths for your skill gaps: Structured problem solving partner link

Escape hatches — adjacent fields with better verdicts

Computed from U.S. Dept. of Labor O*NET skill profiles: high overlap with what you already do, materially higher resistance score.

Detectives and Criminal Investigators SAFE · 69/100 · you already have ~73% of the skill profile

Skills to close: Science, Critical Thinking, Troubleshooting, Operations Monitoring

Private Detectives and Investigators EXPOSED · 56/100 · you already have ~70% of the skill profile

Skills to close: Complex Problem Solving, Critical Thinking, Science, Systems Evaluation

Police and Sheriff's Patrol Officers SAFE · 82/100 · you already have ~65% of the skill profile

Skills to close: Operations Monitoring, Troubleshooting, Science, Operation and Control

Who is actually doing this

The score above is about what the work exposes. This is reporting about real deployments in this occupation — the difference between "could be automated" and "somebody automated it."

E.W. Scripps

Field report — do you do this job?

Has AI actually changed your work?

Self-reported and unverified — a sentiment signal, not a survey. One response per person per occupation; you can change your answer.

From people who do this job

Nobody has filed one yet. If you do this work, you know things the rubric can't see.

What has actually changed in your work?

Concrete beats general: a tool that arrived, a task that moved, a headcount decision you watched happen. Don't include anything that identifies you or your employer if that would put you at risk.