← Risk register SOC 35-3023 · reviewed 2026-08-11

Fast Food and Counter Workers

3,854,050 US workers · median $31,200/yr · Food

EXPOSED

The order-taking half of this job — reading menus aloud, upselling, taking payment, keying modifications — is already being handled by self-service kiosks, mobile apps, and drive-thru voice AI at national chains. What survives is the physical half: assembling orders fast in a hot, cramped, unpredictable line, restocking, cleaning, and handling the customer who is angry, confused, or spilled something. That physical work is what keeps this from being fully cooked, but the labor is unlicensed, low-discretion, and priced to be replaceable, so headcount per store keeps sliding.

10-year outlook: The job doesn't disappear in ten years, but the cashier role largely does; expect fewer workers per store, more of them on the line or as shift leads, with pay pressure staying tight.

US employment, 2019–2025-3.6%
3,996,8203,854,050 workers

Roughly flat across the period, with year-to-year wobble.

Median pay $22,740 → $31,200 +9.8% in real terms (nominal +37.2%, less ~25% US inflation over the period)

The job count is not the verdict

This line is counted by the Bureau of Labor Statistics — the one figure on this page that isn't a judgement of ours. Headcount moves on demand, offshoring, demographics and the business cycle, and automation is one term among several, often not the loudest.

So a falling line is not evidence that AI did it, and a rising one is not evidence that it won't. Both happen in this register: some occupations resist automation and shrink anyway, others are highly automatable and keep growing. The marked year is 2020.

BLS projection, 2024–2034

+6.1% 3,796,000 → 4,029,200 on the projections basis

Exposed, but growing

AI can already do a lot of these tasks, and the BLS still expects +6.1% more of these jobs by 2034. Demand for the output is growing faster than the work is being automated away — the mechanism BLS gives for software developers, and the combination people most often misread as an error.

Different clocks. The score is what current AI could do to this work today. The projection is how many of these jobs will exist in 2034. Everything between the two — how fast employers actually adopt, whether demand grows in the meantime — is why they can point opposite ways without either being wrong.

~904,300 openings a year on average, including replacing people who leave.

One email if this score changes. Watch as many occupations as you like from the same address — no account, and nothing is sent on a schedule, only when a verdict actually moves.

Also known as — 24 job titles this covers

Titles reported by people doing this work, from the US Department of Labor's O*NET survey. If your job title is here, this page is about your work even though the name doesn't match.

CarhopJuicerServerBaristaMeat ClerkSoda ClerkCafe ServerCafe WorkerCounter HopCrew MemberFood ServerLine PersonLine ServerOrder ClerkSoda JerkerCafe BaristaCoffee MakerDietary AideOrder FillerWindow ClerkCoffee BrewerCounter ClerkFood ChampionFountain Jerk

Score — 34/100 resistance

Holding it up: embodiment (15/20). Weakest point: liability shield (1/20).

Five dimensions, 0–20 each, summed. Higher means more protected. The arithmetic is shown so you can check it: 10 + 15 + 1 + 5 + 3 = 34. · Scored 2026-08-11, and re-examined when evidence accumulates rather than on a schedule.

Task resistance 10/20

Mixed — a routine tier and a judgment tier At 10 the job splits almost evenly: kiosks, app ordering, and drive-thru voice systems have already absorbed order entry, payment, and upselling, while grabbing fries from the basket, dressing a burger to a modification screen, bagging drive-thru orders, and wiping down the soda station still need hands on the line — that's why it isn't 4, and the fact that none of the surviving tasks require judgment or training beyond a shift is why it isn't 14.

Embodiment 15/20

Hands-on in uncontrolled environments 15 reflects a shift spent standing on greasy quarry tile between a fryer at 350°F and a make table, reaching into ice bins, hauling syrup boxes and 50-lb potato cases from the walk-in, and mopping lobbies — an uncontrolled space where customers, spills, and rush-hour chaos change the floor minute to minute, though it stays inside one building rather than out in weather or traffic.

Liability shield 1/20

No licence, no signature requirement A 1, not a 0, because most states require only a food handler card obtained from a 90-minute online course; the ServSafe-certified manager and the franchise owner carry the health code citations, and nobody sues a counter worker by name.

Trust premium 5/20

Anonymous artifact production 5 grants that regulars at a breakfast counter or a small-town drive-thru do come back for the person who remembers their order, but the brand, the price point, and the drive-thru timer are what bring traffic — customers accept whoever is at the window and the chain rotates schedules on the assumption they will.

Judgment & accountability 3/20

Executes defined procedures on defined inputs 3 matches a job run on posted build charts, timed holding windows, and a POS that dictates the sequence; the discretion that exists — remaking a wrong order, comping a drink, calling the manager over — is capped by dollar limits and escalation rules written above your pay grade.

Scored twice. An independent second run returned 37/100 — EXPOSED, agreeing with the verdict above.

This score sits on a verdict boundary. At 34/100 it is one point from COOKED. Re-scoring moves results by a point or two, so here the score is more informative than the label.

Confidence: high · reviewed 2026-08-11 · how scoring works

What this job involves — and which parts are yours

The verdict above describes this occupation as a whole. Almost nobody does the typical version of a job — tick what's actually in your week and see how your own mix sits.

AI already does these at usable quality

These still need a person

Active moats on the surviving side: embodiment, physical-presence

How to future-proof this job

Training paths for your skill gaps: Coursera — work planning and personal productivity free to audit · MIT OpenCourseWare — problem-solving and analytical method courses free · Khan Academy — reading and vocabulary, all levels, free free · Coursera — customer service and client-facing skill courses free to audit · Toastmasters — public speaking practice at local clubs worldwide low · MIT OpenCourseWare — operations management free · Coursera — quality control and inspection courses, auditable free free to audit · edX — systems thinking and evaluation methods free to audit

All 35 skills ranked by how many jobs they open →

Where this experience transfers — occupations you could move toward

Computed from U.S. Dept. of Labor O*NET skill and knowledge profiles: high overlap with what you already do, a materially higher resistance score, no large jump in required training, and no licence you would have to start a new pipeline to get. Targets that pay meaningfully less, that are themselves COOKED, or whose own headcount is falling are excluded — a move into a shrinking trade is not an escape.

Cooks, Short Order EXPOSED · 47/100 · you already have ~86% of the skill profile

Skills to close: Time Management, Complex Problem Solving, Reading Comprehension

Waiters and Waitresses EXPOSED · 49/100 · you already have ~85% of the skill profile

Skills to close: Service Orientation, Speaking, Complex Problem Solving

Butchers and Meat Cutters EXPOSED · 51/100 · you already have ~81% of the skill profile

Skills to close: Complex Problem Solving, Operations Analysis, Quality Control Analysis, Systems Evaluation

What would move this back up — beyond any one person

The moves above are yours to make. This is the other half: what would have to change in the world for the occupation itself to score higher. None of it is in any one person's gift, but it is where the floor actually comes from. Scores here are not a one-way ratchet. Only two of the five dimensions — task resistance and embodiment — track what machines can do. The other three track law, what buyers will pay for, and who is answerable, and those move in both directions, often in response to the same pressure AI creates. If every lever below landed, this occupation would score around 46/100, still EXPOSED.

4 specific changes that would raise this score
  • already happening task resistance +3

    As kiosks and drive-thru voice AI absorb order entry (McDonald's/Google, Wendy's FreshAI, Taco Bell Voice AI), what remains per surviving headcount is exception handling: wrong-order remakes, allergen questions, kiosk failure recovery, de-escalating angry customers. If chains keep one 'guest experience lead' per shift rather than zero, that residual role scores higher than the blended job does today.

  • already happening embodiment +2

    Kitchen-line robotics (Miso Robotics Flippy, Chipotle's Autocado, Sweetgreen Infinite Kitchen) keep failing on the messy assembly and cleaning tier while fryer/grill stations automate; if capex stays high and franchisee ROI stays negative, the remaining role is the unstructured tier — spill cleanup, restock in cramped space, equipment jams, custom builds — which no current arm handles. This is a task-mix effect, not new capability.

  • plausible liability shield +4

    Food-safety statutes could name a person rather than a process: state or local adoption of FDA Food Code provisions requiring a Certified Food Protection Manager physically on premises during all hours of operation (already required in some jurisdictions for some hours), plus allergen-disclosure rules requiring a trained human to confirm allergen handling on any modified order. That makes at least one on-shift worker legally non-removable.

  • plausible judgment accountability +3

    If allergen and cross-contact liability keeps growing through litigation, the on-shift certified person owns a consequential call — refuse the order, remake it, shut a station — under ambiguity, and is the named party in incident reports. Also applies to alcohol service at chains expanding beer/wine, where server liability laws already attach personally.

The limit. Even with a food-safety personal-liability rule, the shield covers one certified person per shift, not the crew — so the occupation's score can rise while headcount keeps falling. Per-worker resistance and total employment move in opposite directions here.

These are conditions, not forecasts — what would have to happen, not what will. Specific rules, cases and bills are named so you can go and check whether they exist and where they stand; verify before relying on any of them. Nothing here is legal or financial advice.

Where this work is, and what it pays there

BLS metro figures for 393 areas. The verdict above does not change by city — the rubric judges what the work involves, not where it happens — but pay and headcount do, and the national median hides a very wide range.

Most of these jobs

New York-Newark-Jersey City, NY-NJ 166,040 $35,420 +14%
Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim, CA 160,270 $42,110 +35%
Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington, TX 128,380 $28,070 -10%
Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands, TX 105,810 $27,570 -12%
Chicago-Naperville-Elgin, IL-IN 97,280 $34,630 +11%
Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Roswell, GA 80,730 $27,780 -11%
Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington, PA-NJ-DE-MD 69,080 $32,220 +3%
Washington-Arlington-Alexandria, DC-VA-MD-WV 60,560 $34,600 +11%

Best paid

Napa, CA 1,440 $45,410 +46%
San Jose-Sunnyvale-Santa Clara, CA 23,060 $44,570 +43%
Vallejo, CA 4,430 $44,110 +41%

Percentages are against this occupation's national median of $31,200. Counts are jobs in that metro, not vacancies. Metros where the BLS suppressed the cell are absent rather than shown as zero.

Who is actually doing this

The score above is about what the work exposes. This is reporting about real deployments in this occupation — the difference between "could be automated" and "somebody automated it."

McDonald's · Taco Bell · Shake Shack · Wendy's

0 of 0 reported cases, with sources

Quick take — do you do this job?

Has AI actually changed your work? One tap, anonymous, and the running tally is public. Nothing else is asked of you.

Self-reported and unverified — a sentiment signal, not a survey. One response per person per occupation; you can change your answer.

Field reports — what people say has changed

No field reports yet. A written account takes a paragraph rather than a tap, goes to an editor before it appears, and is the one thing on this page the rubric cannot produce on its own.

File a field report

Concrete beats general: a tool that arrived, a task that moved, a headcount decision you watched happen. Don't include anything that identifies you or your employer if that would put you at risk.

Watch this verdict
Kept current

Rather than check back: get the digest and we'll tell you what changed — or watch a single occupation from its own page.