← Risk register SOC 51-9031 · reviewed 2026-08-11

Cutters and Trimmers, Hand

6,060 US workers · median $38,020/yr · Production

COOKED

Trimming excess material from molded parts, hand-cutting fabric or foam to pattern, and deburring by knife or shears are physical tasks that language AI cannot touch — but they are exactly the repetitive, fixed-geometry work that CNC routers, die cutters, waterjet, laser, and vision-guided trimming cells already do faster and more consistently. The job is protected from AI and exposed to ordinary capital equipment, and employment (about 6,000 nationally) has been shrinking for years. There is no license, no client relationship, and almost no discretionary decision-making to fall back on.

10-year outlook: Expect continued double-digit decline as trimming and cutting cells get cheaper and vision-guided; the remaining jobs concentrate in low-volume custom shops and in setup/operator roles on the machines that replaced the hand work.

Score — 27/100 resistance

Five dimensions, 0–20 each, summed. Higher means more protected. The arithmetic is shown so you can check it: 10 + 12 + 0 + 2 + 3 = 27.

Task resistance 10/20

Mixed — a routine tier and a judgment tier. A 10 reflects the split inside the job: nesting and cutting flat stock to a repeated pattern is already handled by die and laser cutting cells, while the residual work — trimming flash off an irregular casting, cutting around a hide's flaws, handling limp foam or leather that won't hold registration — still needs a hand on the shears, which is why it sits mid-band rather than at 4.

Embodiment 12/20

Some physical or field component. You stand at a bench in a plant with knives, shears, and abrasive wheels, and the parts come to you — controlled indoor workspace, fixed station, no crawling into attics or working off a lift — which caps this at 12 instead of the 15+ a field trade would earn.

Liability shield 0/20

No licence, no signature requirement. No state licence, no certification body, no personal sign-off on the piece; if a trimmed part fails inspection it goes back to the line as scrap under the plant's QC system, not against your name.

Trust premium 2/20

Anonymous artifact production. The buyer of the finished gasket, garment, or molded part never learns who trimmed it, and you are interchangeable with the next operator on the following shift — the 2 is for the shop-floor familiarity a supervisor loses when a fast, low-scrap trimmer quits.

Judgment & accountability 3/20

Executes defined procedures on defined inputs. Cut lines are set by the pattern, template, or scribe mark and tolerances are handed down on the work order; the only calls you own are when to reject an obviously bad piece and when to change a dull blade, which is why this is a 3 and not a 7.

Scored twice. An independent second run returned 30/100 — COOKED, agreeing with the verdict above.

Confidence: high · reviewed 2026-08-11 · how scoring works

Tasks already automatable

What survives

Active moats: embodiment

How to future-proof this job

Escape hatches — adjacent fields with better verdicts

Computed from U.S. Dept. of Labor O*NET skill profiles: high overlap with what you already do, materially higher resistance score.

Sewers, Hand EXPOSED · 43/100 · you already have ~83% of the skill profile

Skills to close: Operations Analysis

Cooks, Restaurant EXPOSED · 57/100 · you already have ~83% of the skill profile

Skills to close: Management of Financial Resources, Active Learning, Equipment Selection, Management of Material Resources

Cleaning, Washing, and Metal Pickling Equipment Operators and Tenders EXPOSED · 42/100 · you already have ~82% of the skill profile

Skills to close: Equipment Maintenance, Operation and Control, Operations Monitoring, Equipment Selection

Field report — do you do this job?

Has AI actually changed your work?

Self-reported and unverified — a sentiment signal, not a survey. One response per person per occupation; you can change your answer.

From people who do this job

Nobody has filed one yet. If you do this work, you know things the rubric can't see.

What has actually changed in your work?

Concrete beats general: a tool that arrived, a task that moved, a headcount decision you watched happen. Don't include anything that identifies you or your employer if that would put you at risk.