← Risk register Form CI-N · RSS

Automation dispatch

711 reported cases of AI and automation changing specific work — 357 of them things a named organisation has actually done, across 348 employers. Updated daily.

We link and summarise; we never republish. Items are screened to exclude vendor launches, funding rounds, and predictions — only reported action at a named organisation gets through, and every rejection is logged. Inclusion is not endorsement of the reporting.

Trending — most reported, last 30 days

Volume of reporting, not movement in score. A busy news month is not the same as a job changing.

43 reports Software Developers EXPOSED 41/100

25 reports Customer Service Representatives COOKED 20/100

7 reports Human Resources Specialists EXPOSED 35/100

6 reports News Analysts, Reporters, and Journalists EXPOSED 37/100

5 reports Postsecondary Teachers, All Other EXPOSED 46/100

4 reports Computer and Information Research Scientists EXPOSED 40/100

Job cuts attributed to AI — 167 reported

Cases where the employer or the reporting explicitly named AI or automation as a reason for the cuts. This is the hardest evidence here and also the most contested: companies have incentives to blame AI for cuts made for other reasons, and to deny it when it's true. Treat these as reported claims, not audited fact.

>

Showing the 200 most recent of 711 on file. The full archive is in the data and behind every occupation's evidence section.